Thomas Ertman
Associate Professor of Sociology; Director of Undergraduate Studies
Ph.D. 1990, M.A. 1985, B.A. 1981, Harvard University.
Office Address: 295 Lafayette St., Room 4110
Phone: (212) 998-8359
Email: thomas.ertman@nyu.edu
Areas of Research/Interest: Comparative/historical sociology; political sociology; social theory; sociology of the arts.
Bio:
For as far back as I can remember, I have struggled to understand why Europe--and especially Germany--left the path of peace and prosperity after 1914 for that of war and genocide. While an undergraduate, I thought philosophy might throw some light on this problem, but I found its answers too abstract. It was the intellectual dynamism of historical sociology in the early 1980's, open as it was to the latest developments in history, social theory and political science, that persuaded me that I could best pursue this question further as a graduate student in sociology.
Select Publications:
Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, 1997. Barrington Moore Prize of the ASA 1998.
"Democracy and Dictatorship in Interwar Western Europe Revisited." World Politics, April 1998.
Taming the Leviathan: Building Democratic Nation-States in 19th and 20th Century Western Europe. (In Progress.)
For many years scholars have sought to explain why the European states which emerged in the period before the French Revolution developed along such different lines. Why did some become absolutist and others constitutionalist? What enabled some to develop bureaucratic administrative systems, while others remained dependent upon patrimonial practices? This book presents a new theory of state-building in medieval and early modern Europe. Ertman argues that two factors - the organisation of local government at the time of state formation and the timing of sustained geo-military competition - can explain most of the variation in political regimes and in state infrastructures found across the continent during the second half of the eighteenth century. Drawing on insights developed in historical sociology, comparative politics, and economic history, this book makes a compelling case for the value of interdisciplinary approaches to the study of political development.
梯利曾说,历史社会学的两大经典命题乃是资本主义的扩展和近代国家的生成。梯利用自己的若干煌煌巨著为后者提供了一个可以置信的解释:地缘政治的竞争格局引发欧洲国家连绵的战争,而筹措战争资源最终导致了现代意义上的国家机器的诞生,君主、政治精英和民众之间的妥协和斗争...
評分 評分 評分梯利曾说,历史社会学的两大经典命题乃是资本主义的扩展和近代国家的生成。梯利用自己的若干煌煌巨著为后者提供了一个可以置信的解释:地缘政治的竞争格局引发欧洲国家连绵的战争,而筹措战争资源最终导致了现代意义上的国家机器的诞生,君主、政治精英和民众之间的妥协和斗争...
評分梯利曾说,历史社会学的两大经典命题乃是资本主义的扩展和近代国家的生成。梯利用自己的若干煌煌巨著为后者提供了一个可以置信的解释:地缘政治的竞争格局引发欧洲国家连绵的战争,而筹措战争资源最终导致了现代意义上的国家机器的诞生,君主、政治精英和民众之间的妥协和斗争...
The intro is enough to convey Ertman's arguments and contributions.
评分本周第二本書瞭
评分2018 fall: state-building in Medieval and early modern Europe. factors to explain variation in political regimes and in state infrastructures: the organization of local government, the timing of the onset of sustained geopolitical competition, the independent influence of strong representative assemblies on administrative and financial institution.
评分1、增加瞭dimension of state infrastructure,是點睛之筆。 2、基於character of local government來解釋regime,很有說服力。 3、state infrastructure與strong representative institution的齣現次序造就瞭英國和波蘭的不同命運。
评分其實隻看瞭Introduction用時間本身作為解釋變量確實是挺有意義的做法
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有