Carl Schmitt, the Thomas Hobbes of the 20th century, joined the Nazi party in 1933 and aspired to become the crown jurist and political philosopher of the Third Reich. But, because of his anti-Nazi past, friendships with Jews and Marxists, and contempt for biological racism, Schmitt was severely attacked by the SS in 1936 and warned to stop posing as a National Socialist thinker. Fearful of what this might imply in the rapidly evolving one-party SS state, Schmitt began to distance himself from his National Socialist adventure--even tempered his recently acquired anti-Semitism--and carefully started to reconnect himself in 1937 and 1938 to the pre-1933 Schmitt. Writing in 1938 under the pretext of studying the significance of the symbol of the leviathan in Hobbes's theory of state, Schmitt alluded to the demise of the Third Reich because of its rapid transformation into a totalitarian polity. As Schmitt recognized, in this state, the Hobbesian protection-obedience axiom was being heavily tilted in favor of obedience at the expense of protection. When this occurred, Schmitt observed, "the soul of a people...betakes itself on the 'secret road' that leads inward. Then grows the counterforce of silence and stillness", and "Public power and force may be ever so completely and emphatically recognized and ever so loyally respected, but only as a public and only an external power, it is hollow and already dead from within." Schmitt survived the fall of the Third Reich, and in the postwar years came to be recognized as one of the most significant political philosophers of the century. This is the first translation available of this important work which will be of great value to scholars and students of modern political philosophy, legal theory, and the history of Weimar and Nazi Germany.
读罢《霍布斯国家学说中的利维坦》,感觉就象是读完了一部悬疑小说,施米特为大家解密了利维坦这个庞大无比的国家机器是如何死于犹太学者的阴谋。首先,利维坦在犹太人的神秘神话中,和比希莫斯一样是异教徒生命力繁衍不息的象征,利维坦和比希莫斯的争斗象征着异教徒之间的战...
评分施米特认为霍布斯“会死的上帝”死了两次:一次是内外之分,“利维坦”被当作内在的、彼岸的超越性有机论的敌人,被描述成缺乏生机的空洞的机械化装置;一次是国家与个人的区分,它成了法律实证主义的先驱,正当性萎缩成合法性,自由主义热衷的国家与个人之间的“间接权力”被...
评分 评分卡尔·施密特:《霍布斯国家学说中的利维坦》,应星、朱雁冰译,华东师范大学出版社2008年版 Gunter Maschke[ed.], 1982 【按:1936年施密特被免去职务开始接受纳粹调查,第二年他开始写这本小册子,书中充满了亢奋低沉的语调,记录了施密特对于三个世纪前同样怀才不遇、备受猜...
评分施米特的《霍布斯国家学说中的利维坦》(1938)几乎与霍布斯的《利维坦》一样晦涩。施米特花费大量笔墨探讨利维坦的诠释问题却一无所获,倒是《完成了的宗教改革》(1965)一文的末尾提到索尔斯伯里的国家图像象征给出了更确切的关于利维坦之形象来源的暗示。此外,《霍》书中...
哈哈,这是我从头到尾一字不落地阅读完的第一本英文书,有纪念意义。虽然作为演讲集子,稍微浅了点,但施米特的洞察力可谓是预知了许多战后被热烈讨论的论题,诸如霍布斯与自由主义的关联、Justice as impariality、政治自由主义as well as public reason等等,真是令人钦佩的头脑呀。除了论题之外,这部书的研究方法也让人们看到了日后的剑桥学派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲学,恐怕只能获取一些参考价值。
评分哈哈,这是我从头到尾一字不落地阅读完的第一本英文书,有纪念意义。虽然作为演讲集子,稍微浅了点,但施米特的洞察力可谓是预知了许多战后被热烈讨论的论题,诸如霍布斯与自由主义的关联、Justice as impariality、政治自由主义as well as public reason等等,真是令人钦佩的头脑呀。除了论题之外,这部书的研究方法也让人们看到了日后的剑桥学派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲学,恐怕只能获取一些参考价值。
评分哈哈,这是我从头到尾一字不落地阅读完的第一本英文书,有纪念意义。虽然作为演讲集子,稍微浅了点,但施米特的洞察力可谓是预知了许多战后被热烈讨论的论题,诸如霍布斯与自由主义的关联、Justice as impariality、政治自由主义as well as public reason等等,真是令人钦佩的头脑呀。除了论题之外,这部书的研究方法也让人们看到了日后的剑桥学派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲学,恐怕只能获取一些参考价值。
评分哈哈,这是我从头到尾一字不落地阅读完的第一本英文书,有纪念意义。虽然作为演讲集子,稍微浅了点,但施米特的洞察力可谓是预知了许多战后被热烈讨论的论题,诸如霍布斯与自由主义的关联、Justice as impariality、政治自由主义as well as public reason等等,真是令人钦佩的头脑呀。除了论题之外,这部书的研究方法也让人们看到了日后的剑桥学派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲学,恐怕只能获取一些参考价值。
评分哈哈,这是我从头到尾一字不落地阅读完的第一本英文书,有纪念意义。虽然作为演讲集子,稍微浅了点,但施米特的洞察力可谓是预知了许多战后被热烈讨论的论题,诸如霍布斯与自由主义的关联、Justice as impariality、政治自由主义as well as public reason等等,真是令人钦佩的头脑呀。除了论题之外,这部书的研究方法也让人们看到了日后的剑桥学派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲学,恐怕只能获取一些参考价值。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有