This book is a comprehensive study of cooperation among the advanced capitalist countries. Can cooperation persist without the dominance of a single power, such as the United States after World War II? To answer this pressing question, Robert Keohane analyzes the institutions, or 'international regimes', through which cooperation has taken place in the world political economy and describes the evolution of these regimes as American hegemony has eroded. Refuting the idea that the decline of hegemony makes cooperation impossible, he views international regimes not as weak substitutes for world government but as devices for facilitating decentralized cooperation among egoistic actors. In the preface, the author addresses the issue of cooperation after the end of the Soviet empire and with the renewed dominance of the United States, in security matters, as well as recent scholarship on cooperation.
Robert O. Keohane is Professor of International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University. He is the author, with Gary King and Sidney Verba, of Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton) as well as the author, with Joseph S. Nye, Jr., of Power and Interdependence (Addison-Wesley).
相对原作,苏先生的翻译作的虽有些生硬,但相对英语语言基础颇弱的人还是一本相当好的国际关系学的入门读物;原作的目的的是让更加广泛的人群来关注时事,所以特意避免了许多专业词汇,而出自苏先生之口,翻身成为教科书一般的读物,旨在可惜可惜啊,除去其伪道学的外衣,这本...
评分这本书和沃尔兹的《国际政治理论》是80年代以来国际关系学术界引用率最高的著作,主要探讨了霸权后的国际合作何以可能,运用了国际政治经济学的研究方法,而且苏长和教授的翻译也很用心和独到,对于学国际政治的和对国际政治感兴趣的朋友,该书值得一读。
评分相对原作,苏先生的翻译作的虽有些生硬,但相对英语语言基础颇弱的人还是一本相当好的国际关系学的入门读物;原作的目的的是让更加广泛的人群来关注时事,所以特意避免了许多专业词汇,而出自苏先生之口,翻身成为教科书一般的读物,旨在可惜可惜啊,除去其伪道学的外衣,这本...
评分一个月前断续地看完了这本书,很多地方虽然不是很懂,大概就看过去了。今天重新翻了一下,又有了新的理解,与书友们讨论:) 在古典理性主义中,人可以在不考虑决策成本的状态下,完美地分析各种方案的成败得失。 在这种情况下,基欧汉采用了功能主义分析。制度...
评分寻觅empirical evidence的时候心想美国接过英国的霸权,现在能推论到哪里,过去强硬打压日本现在跟中国打,好像木有。看了这本老书。算推翻realism的constructivism,中心大体是霸权终结后,按之前霸权建立起来的国际经济体系还会惯性维持(post-hegemonic cooperation is also possible)。书比较老说话比较啰嗦,比如the threat to cut off a particular state's access to one's own market-说贸易壁垒或者经济制裁不就好了嘛?预感political economy学科会被要求又读一遍。
评分PS 650: International-Institutionalist Arguments about International Economic Cooperation
评分废话多的要死,逻辑还算清晰。讲international cooperation的
评分为了写篇论文把这本书来来回回翻了好几遍 虽说不是学经济的 光从英语角度来说还是挺容易看的
评分寻觅empirical evidence的时候心想美国接过英国的霸权,现在能推论到哪里,过去强硬打压日本现在跟中国打,好像木有。看了这本老书。算推翻realism的constructivism,中心大体是霸权终结后,按之前霸权建立起来的国际经济体系还会惯性维持(post-hegemonic cooperation is also possible)。书比较老说话比较啰嗦,比如the threat to cut off a particular state's access to one's own market-说贸易壁垒或者经济制裁不就好了嘛?预感political economy学科会被要求又读一遍。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有