具体描述
The "Ming-i Tai-fang Lu "of Huang Tsunghsi (1610-1695) is unique in the history of Chinese Political literature. Since the time of Confucius and Mencius, no other work in the long Confucian tradition has stood out so clearly as a major critique of Chinese dynastic institutions. The importance of this work rests not only in its advocacy of basic principles of humane governance but also on its incisive analysis of the key institutions of imperial rule and political economy. Huang's treatise, though firmly grounded in classic Confucian teachings emphasizing government based on democratic principles, also incorporates significant elements from alternative schools of thought and reflects the long experience of Chinese dynastic rule subsequent to the great age of classical thinkers in the later Chou period. Huang draws together in a concise manner both his own original ideas and those others had expressed only in scattered form over two millennia. Later reformers and revolutionary leaders such as Liang Ch'i-ch'ao and Sun Yat-sen used Huang's essays in the Ministership, Law, the Schools, and the Land System to promote their own political aims. Modern Scholars have confirmed Huang's stature as the most enduring and influential critic of Chinese despotism and have recognized his "plan" as the most powerful affirmation of a liberal Confucian political vision in premodern times.
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
这里有网上版本可以看 http://ef.cdpa.nsysu.edu.tw/ccw/01/my.htm 随便摘几段分享一下 "是故明乎为君之职分，则唐、虞之世，人人能让，许由、务光非绝尘也；不明乎为君之职分，则市井之间，人人可欲，许由、务光所以旷后世而不闻也。" "故我之出而仕也，为天下，非为君也；...
评分如果这本书放在当时的话，那真是用的很多心思才得到的结论。 在清朝时，很多的措施已经采纳了，避免了很多明的错误， 不知当朝者是否是看了这本书. 从侧面来看，也很为明的败落而惋惜，到总归来，这都是历史， 后人哀之而不鉴之，亦使后人而复哀后人也 前两篇 原君，原臣，在...
评分 评分 评分用户评价
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有