圖書標籤: 曆史 傳記 知識分子 英語 迴憶錄/傳記 essay Paul_Johnson
发表于2025-02-06
Intellectuals pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025
Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago "the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind." Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.
Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. "Beware intellectuals," he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). "Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice." Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.
Author of MODERN TIMES and A HISTORY OF THE JEWS
關於馬剋思那篇中文版刪除。
評分關於馬剋思那篇中文版刪除。
評分以記者的筆法寫偉人八卦 有趣 有料 也有偏見
評分關於馬剋思那篇中文版刪除。
評分痛罵左派,階級立場鮮明。
想必作者肯定不喜欢尼采的超人思想吧? 作者所谓的知识分子“抽象”思考的人,是保罗定义为作者本人必须符合其“抽象”思考的人的未来类型。 尼采的超人思想是追求的一种人的类型,是超越现在的未来人,他高屋建瓴的仰望的未来的人的类型,而不是现存的人。保罗真是误导了广大...
評分一 人性 约翰逊对这些臭名昭著的知识分子作了一份详细的考察,他们身上固然有知识分子一些特有的毛病:自大、虚荣、漠视他人、自我中心等等,但如果全部视为他们的问题,或者只有他们存在问题,是否有失偏颇? 约翰逊应该再写一本《大众》或《人性》,与之对照,看看这些臭名...
評分一 人性 约翰逊对这些臭名昭著的知识分子作了一份详细的考察,他们身上固然有知识分子一些特有的毛病:自大、虚荣、漠视他人、自我中心等等,但如果全部视为他们的问题,或者只有他们存在问题,是否有失偏颇? 约翰逊应该再写一本《大众》或《人性》,与之对照,看看这些臭名...
評分一 人性 约翰逊对这些臭名昭著的知识分子作了一份详细的考察,他们身上固然有知识分子一些特有的毛病:自大、虚荣、漠视他人、自我中心等等,但如果全部视为他们的问题,或者只有他们存在问题,是否有失偏颇? 约翰逊应该再写一本《大众》或《人性》,与之对照,看看这些臭名...
評分约翰逊的这本书与我们当今的“潮流”——鄙视知识分子,嘲笑高学历,颇有契合之处。比如,眼下网上常有人将教授戏称为“叫兽”,而大众媒体也的确不是披露某些教授的无耻言行。一个浮躁拜金的社会出现招摇撞骗、德行有亏的知识分子是在不足为奇。然而我们也不能以“一颗老...
Intellectuals pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025