圖書標籤: 社會學  政治學  哲學  馬剋思主義及其研究  政治  伊格爾頓  Theory  Philosophy   

喜歡 Ideology 的讀者還喜歡

Eagleton undertook a colossal project of delineating the historical debates on the concept of ideology, covering such areas as philology, sociology, and philosophy. Ideology, following Eagleton, is not empirical representations of materials, but a set of relations between beliefs that can be varied only through a transformation of materials.

Eagleton undertook a colossal project of delineating the historical debates on the concept of ideology, covering such areas as philology, sociology, and philosophy. Ideology, following Eagleton, is not empirical representations of materials, but a set of relations between beliefs that can be varied only through a transformation of materials.

對於“意識形態”曆史的綜述 然而寫著“introduction”讀起來還那麼晦澀難懂也是很讓人崩潰瞭orz

Eagleton undertook a colossal project of delineating the historical debates on the concept of ideology, covering such areas as philology, sociology, and philosophy. Ideology, following Eagleton, is not empirical representations of materials, but a set of relations between beliefs that can be varied only through a transformation of materials.

Eagleton undertook a colossal project of delineating the historical debates on the concept of ideology, covering such areas as philology, sociology, and philosophy. Ideology, following Eagleton, is not empirical representations of materials, but a set of relations between beliefs that can be varied only through a transformation of materials.

这大概就是典型的不明觉厉的东西。作者善用各种修辞和比喻，然而不是同个文化背景的读起来不太懂。如果有"跨语际书写"，那么也应该有“跨语际阅读”，即阅读者总是按照自己的文化背景来理解作品，多少会和原著有差异。好一点，有启发的是创造性解读。差一点的就是谬读。 文章...

这大概就是典型的不明觉厉的东西。作者善用各种修辞和比喻，然而不是同个文化背景的读起来不太懂。如果有"跨语际书写"，那么也应该有“跨语际阅读”，即阅读者总是按照自己的文化背景来理解作品，多少会和原著有差异。好一点，有启发的是创造性解读。差一点的就是谬读。 文章...

这大概就是典型的不明觉厉的东西。作者善用各种修辞和比喻，然而不是同个文化背景的读起来不太懂。如果有"跨语际书写"，那么也应该有“跨语际阅读”，即阅读者总是按照自己的文化背景来理解作品，多少会和原著有差异。好一点，有启发的是创造性解读。差一点的就是谬读。 文章...

这大概就是典型的不明觉厉的东西。作者善用各种修辞和比喻，然而不是同个文化背景的读起来不太懂。如果有"跨语际书写"，那么也应该有“跨语际阅读”，即阅读者总是按照自己的文化背景来理解作品，多少会和原著有差异。好一点，有启发的是创造性解读。差一点的就是谬读。 文章...

这大概就是典型的不明觉厉的东西。作者善用各种修辞和比喻，然而不是同个文化背景的读起来不太懂。如果有"跨语际书写"，那么也应该有“跨语际阅读”，即阅读者总是按照自己的文化背景来理解作品，多少会和原著有差异。好一点，有启发的是创造性解读。差一点的就是谬读。 文章...