Few would question the truism that humankind is the crowning achievement of evolution; that the defining thrust of life's history yields progress over time from the primitive and simple to the more advanced and complex; that the disappearance of .400 hitting in baseball is a fact to be bemoaned; or that identifying an existing trend can be helpful in making important life decisions. Few, that is, except Stephen Jay Gould who, in his new book Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin, proves that all of these intuitive truths are, in fact, wrong.
"All of these mistaken beliefs arise out of the same analytical flaw in our reasoning, our Platonic tendency to reduce a broad spectrum to a single, pinpointed essence," says Gould. "This way of thinking allows us to confirm our most ingrained biases that humans are the supreme being on this planet; that all things are inherently driven to become more complex; and that almost any subject can be expressed and understood in terms of an average."
In Full House, Gould shows why a more accurate way of understanding our world (and the history of life) is to look at a given subject within its own context, to see it as a part of a spectrum of variation rather than as an isolated "thing" and then to reconceptualize trends as expansion or contraction of this "full house" of variation, and not as the progress or degeneration of an average value, or single thing. When approached in such a way, the disappearance of .400 hitting becomes a cause for celebration, signaling not a decline in greatness but instead an improvement in the overall level of play in baseball; trends become subject to suspicion, and too often, only a tool of those seeking to advance a particular agenda; and the "Age of Man" (a claim rooted in hubris, not in fact) more accurately becomes the "Age of Bacteria."
"The traditional mode of thinking has led us to draw many conclusions that don't make satisfying sense," says Gould. "It tells us that .400 hitting has disappeared because batters have gotten worse, but how can that be true when record performances have improved in almost any athletic activity?" In a personal eureka!, Gould realized that we were looking at the picture backward, and that a simple conceptual inversion would resolve a number of the paradoxes of the conventional view.
While Full House deftly reveals the shortcomings of the popular reasoning we apply to everyday life situations, Gould also explores his beloved realm of natural history as well. Whether debunking the myth of the successful evolution of the horse (he grants that the story still deserves distinction, but as the icon of evolutionary failure); presenting evidence that the vaunted "progress of life" is really random motion away from simple beginnings, not directed impetus toward complexity; or relegating the kingdoms of Animalai and Plantae to their proper positions on the genealogical chart for all of life (as mere twigs on one of the three bushes), Full House asks nothing less than that we reconceptualize our view of life in a fundamental way.
From the Hardcover edition.
斯蒂芬·杰·古尔德(Stephen Jay Gould),当今世界上著名的进化论者,古生物学家、科学史学家和科学散文作家。1945年生于纽约,在安蒂奥克学院,哥伦比亚大学研读古生物并获博士学位。现任教于哈佛大学,并从事研究工作。主要著作有《自达尔文以来》、《熊猫的拇指》、《汉斯的牙与马的蹄》、《八头小猪》等。
科学把支撑人类自大的巨柱逐一推翻。哥白尼、伽利略否定了地心说;达尔文把我们贬成“动物出身的”,弗洛伊德的心理学研究说人类“无意识”。(P11) 自负的人类总以为自己是高高在上的。习惯的说法是,生命从简单的单细胞逐渐“进化”到最高级的物种——人类。这本书告诉我们...
评分我看书看到一半了,前半部确实糟糕,他要打破普遍认为“人是万物之灵”的心理优越,人总以自己的观念归纳总结研究自然,但是他批评的太刻薄了,第一部分对于目前的人应该不是问题了吧,至少我绝不是那么为作为人而“自大”。第二部分,还算有点意思,只是需要啰嗦这么多吗?对...
评分有能力的还是看原文,任何翻译必然损失不少表意,尤其是一些隐喻的表达。优秀的翻译应该以注释的方式说明隐喻的来历涵义,宁多勿少,给读者尽量多的理解原材料。 这个翻译的做法就是反面典型。书名是 Full house:the spread of excellence from plato to darwin。Full house在...
评分There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms m...
评分有能力的还是看原文,任何翻译必然损失不少表意,尤其是一些隐喻的表达。优秀的翻译应该以注释的方式说明隐喻的来历涵义,宁多勿少,给读者尽量多的理解原材料。 这个翻译的做法就是反面典型。书名是 Full house:the spread of excellence from plato to darwin。Full house在...
= =
评分evolution不是一个完全正面的概念。气场非常强的论说。
评分= =
评分evolution不是一个完全正面的概念。气场非常强的论说。
评分evolution不是一个完全正面的概念。气场非常强的论说。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有