Bowling Alone

Bowling Alone pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025

羅伯特·D. 帕特南(Robert D. Putnam),當代西方著名政治學傢,現任哈佛大學國際事務研究中心主任,肯尼迪政府學院公共政策馬爾林講座教授。他的主要研究領域是政治學、國際政治和公共政策,發錶的著作包括《手拉手:西方七國峰會》、《獨自打保齡:美國社會資本的衰減 》、《讓民主運轉起來》等。

出版者:Touchstone Books by Simon & Schuster
作者:Robert D. Putnam
出品人:
頁數:544
译者:
出版時間:2001-8-7
價格:USD 18.00
裝幀:Paperback
isbn號碼:9780743203043
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 社會學 
  • Sociology 
  • 社會資本 
  • 政治學 
  • 美國 
  • politics 
  • 政治 
  • 政治理論 
  •  
想要找書就要到 小美書屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

Amazon.com Review

Few people outside certain scholarly circles had heard the name Robert D. Putnam before 1995. But then this self-described "obscure academic" hit a nerve with a journal article called "Bowling Alone." Suddenly he found himself invited to Camp David, his picture in People magazine, and his thesis at the center of a raging debate. In a nutshell, he argued that civil society was breaking down as Americans became more disconnected from their families, neighbors, communities, and the republic itself. The organizations that gave life to democracy were fraying. Bowling became his driving metaphor. Years ago, he wrote, thousands of people belonged to bowling leagues. Today, however, they're more likely to bowl alone:

Television, two-career families, suburban sprawl, generational changes in values--these and other changes in American society have meant that fewer and fewer of us find that the League of Women Voters, or the United Way, or the Shriners, or the monthly bridge club, or even a Sunday picnic with friends fits the way we have come to live. Our growing social-capital deficit threatens educational performance, safe neighborhoods, equitable tax collection, democratic responsiveness, everyday honesty, and even our health and happiness.

The conclusions reached in the book Bowling Alone rest on a mountain of data gathered by Putnam and a team of researchers since his original essay appeared. Its breadth of information is astounding--yes, he really has statistics showing people are less likely to take Sunday picnics nowadays. Dozens of charts and graphs track everything from trends in PTA participation to the number of times Americans say they give "the finger" to other drivers each year. If nothing else, Bowling Alone is a fascinating collection of factoids. Yet it does seem to provide an explanation for why "we tell pollsters that we wish we lived in a more civil, more trustworthy, more collectively caring community." What's more, writes Putnam, "Americans are right that the bonds of our communities have withered, and we are right to fear that this transformation has very real costs." Putnam takes a stab at suggesting how things might change, but the book's real strength is in its diagnosis rather than its proposed solutions. Bowling Alone won't make Putnam any less controversial, but it may come to be known as a path-breaking work of scholarship, one whose influence has a long reach into the 21st century. --John J. Miller --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Publishers Weekly

"If you don't go to somebody's funeral, they won't come to yours," Yogi Berra once said, neatly articulating the value of social networks. In this alarming and important study, Putnam, a professor of sociology at Harvard, charts the grievous deterioration over the past two generations of the organized ways in which people relate to one another and partake in civil life in the U.S. For example, in 1960, 62.8% of Americans of voting age participated in the presidential election, whereas by 1996, the percentage had slipped to 48.9%. While most Americans still claim a serious "religious commitment," church attendance is down roughly 25%-50% from the 1950s, and the number of Americans who attended public meetings of any kind dropped 40% between 1973 and 1994. Even the once stable norm of community life has shifted: one in five Americans moves once a year, while two in five expect to move in five years. Putnam claims that this has created a U.S. population that is increasingly isolated and less empathetic toward its fellow citizens, that is often angrier and less willing to unite in communities or as a nation. Marshaling a plentiful array of facts, figures, charts and survey results, Putnam delivers his message with verve and clarity. He concludes his analysis with a concise set of potential solutions, such as educational programs, work-based initiatives and funded community-service programs, offering a ray of hope in what he perceives to be a dire situation. Agent, Rafe Sagalyn. 3-city tour; 20-city radio satellite tour. (June)

Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

具體描述

讀後感

評分

評分

这么有名的书,直到现在因为要引用,才总算借了读了。这本书其实读个一两百字的摘要就可以了,或者用一个副标题也能基本概括出来:美国社会里社会资本衰退的成因及后果。 我还是很喜欢Putnam的风格的,他写的东西结构层次很清楚,基本上就是三段论:成因、后果、解决,然后每一...  

評分

由于地理位置的封闭,中国被纳入世界秩序要比亚洲大陆西部和中部晚上一到两百年,这也意味着对西方文化的接受、学习与传播天生就落后他人,是以才有后人眼里乾隆与华盛顿居然同一时代的时空错乱感。当印度土邦君主娴熟地在欧陆宫廷寻求外交支持时,大清帝国的总督叶名琛只能像...  

評分

这不仅仅是一本政治学经典,也是一本社会学的经典。帕特南的研究不仅是学术性的,也是社会性的,其社会关怀和政治关怀的取向是明显的。不过,我还是更喜欢他的严密的论证风格,针对政治和社会的学术研究做到这一步,吾辈叹服、汗颜!慢慢读吧~  

評分

The definition of social capital There is not a unified definition of social capital. The term was first used by Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk in 1895. Böhm-Bawerk is a member of Austrian School of economics. He used the term as the opposite of “private capi...  

用戶評價

评分

畫大餅畫的又圓又漂亮(所有麯綫都能精確下滑),頗有一種看圖說話、指點江山的豪邁氣概。這本書讓我理解到一本糟糕的社會學著作能多麼以偏概全、排列簡單數據進行貿然因果推斷來糊弄人。真不知普特曼和TV是有多大仇,堅持認為經濟壓力、城鄉流動、交通距離(住宅區隔)、大眾傳媒(電視)、和年代差異纔是抹殺瞭社會參與的緣由,邏輯論證那麼簡單真的不會齣錯嗎?未來發展趨勢如何從純跑數據得齣?社群研究那麼大的話題,沒有定性基礎怎麼觀察?社會資本那麼重要的話題,被你在第四部分簡化成它有多麼多麼好,太不厚道(倒是虛擬社會資本很有意思)。第五部分曆史水平不敢恭維,終章時甚至開始瞭“Let us..by 2010..”的呼籲,簡直把我嚇壞瞭。隻畫一塊大餅自圓其說,根本無法讓人滿意。數據很驚人,Appendix值得圍觀 M

评分

為寫research paper重讀,沒有當時讀中文版時的激動,但對community問題有瞭新的、更深層次的想法。以及必須感謝一年多前這本書把我從思維睏境中拉齣,感謝它同《美國的民主》一起,讓我重新梳理瞭對美國社會認知的途徑。

评分

年代感

评分

Just brilliant.

评分

Social Capital的奠基之作。嘲諷的是,今年已是2010年。Putnam打算什麼時候寫新論文?

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有