马泰·卡林内斯库(Matei Calinescu),美国印第安纳大学比较文学教授。著有《文学与政治》(1982)、《现代主义与意识形态》(1986)等。
"Five Faces of Modernity" is a series of semantic and cultural biographies of words that have taken on special significance in the last century and a half or so: "modernity," "avant-garde," "decadence," "kitsch," and "postmodernism." The concept of modernity--the notion that we, the living, are different and somehow superior to our predecessors and that our civilization is likely to be succeeded by one even superior to ours--is a relatively recent Western invention and one whose time may already have passed, if we believe its postmodern challengers. Calinescu documents the rise of cultural modernity and, in tracing the shifting senses of the five terms under scrutiny, illustrates the intricate value judgments, conflicting orientations, and intellectual paradoxes to which it has given rise.
"Five Faces of Modernity" attempts to do for the foundations of the modernist critical lexicon what earlier terminological studies have done for such complex categories as "classicism," "baroque," "romanticism," "realism," or "symbolism" and thereby fill a gap in literary scholarship. On another, more ambitious level, Calinescu deals at length with the larger issues, dilemmas, ideological tensions, and perplexities brought about by the assertion of modernity.
如果不首先指出导论中的两个错误,我将无法写出本书的笔记,因为我认为这两个错误对于本书的结构来说是根本性的。这两个错误分别是: 1.对超验的错误想象。 2.时间概念的模糊不清。 关于第一点,作者的表述是:“我们在此要讨论的是一个重要的文化转变,即从一种由来已久的永恒...
评分这本书,是看王宏宝的现代西方美学史视频中推荐的,看到了后现代这一篇,只感觉篇首和篇尾有意思外,其他都记不住。个人感觉,不如伯曼写的一切坚固的东西都烟消云散了好。举例太多,过于分散,观点不知就里,可能我比较懒,没研深。不像伯曼的重点分析,举的例子很少。。。。...
评分抓住资产阶级现代性和审美现代性的对立划分,以及“时间”这个关键词,还是能尽量把握一下全书的观点。不过很多地方确实是模糊地读过去,没办法搞清楚,历史和词源这两个分析角度并不友好。导言和第一章现代性概念的起点很高,导致读二三四章的时候心里不是很舒畅,落差有点大...
评分导读(译者言) 两种尖锐冲突而相互依存的现代性:社会现代性(资产阶级的现代性)和审美现代性(文化现代性和文学现代性) 现代主义:十九世纪和二十世纪之交的产物,并不号称终于历史,忠于当下鲜活的个人经验。 先锋派:十九世纪,先锋派的概念只是现代性的一种激进化的、高...
评分总体基础比较稳,两种现代性一直贯穿。但是论述视角时不时在变,所以游离于学术概念史和现代性问题分析之间。 比较中庸,对各种悖论和时间问题把握到位。但是企图用时间牵线,有点牵强。“五副面孔”并不在一个逻辑起点上,结果被序言中一句话化解掉了。也算是有道理吧,不过是...
The chapter on kitsch is a bit weak, but the rest of the book is absolutely awesome: Calinescu is a very rigorous analyst and although he of course cannot come close to a full coverage of that "aesthetic modernity" which he has set his views on, he gives us what seems to be the best overview of the subject of modernism I have read so far.
评分The chapter on kitsch is a bit weak, but the rest of the book is absolutely awesome: Calinescu is a very rigorous analyst and although he of course cannot come close to a full coverage of that "aesthetic modernity" which he has set his views on, he gives us what seems to be the best overview of the subject of modernism I have read so far.
评分卧槽这么多页怎么可能下周就写出review来???拙计!!!
评分aesthetic modernity as "a crisis concept involved in a threefold dialectical opposition," and modernity as "the name of a cultural family resemblance"
评分aesthetic modernity as "a crisis concept involved in a threefold dialectical opposition," and modernity as "the name of a cultural family resemblance"
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有