An informed and excoriating attack on the tragic waste, futility, and hubris of the West's efforts to date to improve the lot of the so-called developing world, with constructive suggestions on how to move forward.
William Easterly's The White Man's Burden is about what its author calls the twin tragedies of global poverty. The first, of course, is that so many are seemingly fated to live horribly stunted, miserable lives and die such early deaths. The second is that after fifty years and more than $2.3 trillion in aid from the West to address the first tragedy, it has shockingly little to show for it. We'll never solve the first tragedy, Easterly argues, unless we figure out the second.
The ironies are many: We preach a gospel of freedom and individual accountability, yet we intrude in the inner workings of other countries through bloated aid bureaucracies like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that are accountable to no one for the effects of their prescriptions. We take credit for the economic success stories of the last fifty years, like South Korea and Taiwan, when in fact we deserve very little. However, we reject all accountability for pouring more than half a trillion dollars into Africa and other regions and trying one "big new idea" after another, to no avail. Most of the places in which we've meddled are in fact no better off or are even worse off than they were before. Could it be that we don't know as much as we think we do about the magic spells that will open the door to the road to wealth?
Absolutely, William Easterly thunders in this angry, irreverent, and important book. He contrasts two approaches: (1) the ineffective planners' approach to development-never able to marshal enough knowledge or motivation to get the overambitious plans implemented to attain the plan's arbitrary targets and (2) a more constructive searchers' approach-always on the lookout for piecemeal improvements to poor peoples' well-being, with a system to get more aid resources to those who find things that work. Once we shift power and money from planners to searchers, there's much we can do that's focused and pragmatic to improve the lot of millions, such as public health, sanitation, education, roads, and nutrition initiatives. We need to face our own history of ineptitude and learn our lessons, especially at a time when the question of our ability to "build democracy," to transplant the institutions of our civil society into foreign soil so that they take root, has become one of the most pressing we face.
本书的作者详细的记述了白人的西方富裕国家对有色人种的贫穷国家的援助,从几个方面分析了成功与失败的原因,包括外国的援助的大计划和低效率、接受国的政局动荡和腐败横行、国际组织的好大喜功和后殖民主义的伪善野蛮等等…… 作者把援助失败和成功的主要原因归结为计划者和调...
评分这本书的翻译是场灾难,以至于我脑子里竟然蹦出来“诘屈聱牙”这个我十年没用过的成语。 “亚的斯亚贝巴的城市市场上非洲最大的露天市场。这里不缺市场。我到该市场去给孩子们买手工艺品。” 这种翻译灾难现场处处可见,我几乎看到一个高中生英语水平的译者拿着一手稿子一手词...
评分我是先看同事的英文版,然后得知出了中文版,欣然购之。 这本书的小标题是《为什么西方的援助总是收效甚微》,作为一个发展工作者来说,很希望知道作者是如何谈的,看有没有什么我,或者中国可以借鉴的。 读完后,我觉得这本书写得太学术了。因为作者只看到了问题的表面,或...
评分这本书的翻译是场灾难,以至于我脑子里竟然蹦出来“诘屈聱牙”这个我十年没用过的成语。 “亚的斯亚贝巴的城市市场上非洲最大的露天市场。这里不缺市场。我到该市场去给孩子们买手工艺品。” 这种翻译灾难现场处处可见,我几乎看到一个高中生英语水平的译者拿着一手稿子一手词...
评分近期,舆论对于社会中层出不穷的慈善组织讨论不断,很多人将目光投向政府监管、独立审计、杜绝腐败等观点。然而关于发展慈善这件事,其根本的援助计划本身究竟是不是存在问题呢?在慈善援助已经有相当长历史的西方社会,为何慈善仍然展现出令人难以忍受的低效? 《...
之前看了几部影片(《血钻》《战争之王》《卢旺达饭店》)顺藤摸瓜找到这本书,和预想的差不多,不过不能只谈市场低估甚至忽略政治,否则你无法解释波士顿人为什么非常乐意去非洲死妈
评分bottom-to-up model is not suitable to developing country...i agree with seven wisdom or seven pillars of western world!
评分bottom-to-up model is not suitable to developing country...i agree with seven wisdom or seven pillars of western world!
评分国际发展和国际援助的罗马非一日建成 许多今天最引以为然的概念和人道倡议也是经过多番事实的失败与哲学的构建 只是我们究竟要帮助那些人什么,怎么帮助,作者说Search on the ground要比Planner from the top实际的多。只是现实中厚厚的政治壁垒让Easterly注定变成不如Sachs受联合国待见
评分还是这种畅销书口吻的教材比较容易阅读进去。主要内容还是比较top-down 的计划和企业精神。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有