Following in the wake of his groundbreaking War in the Age of Intelligent Machines, Manuel De Landa presents a radical synthesis of historical development over the last one thousand years. More than a simple expository history, A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History sketches the outlines of a renewed materialist philosophy of history in the tradition of Fernand Braudel, Gilles Deleuze, and Felix Guattari, while also engaging the critical new understanding of material processes derived from the sciences of dynamics. Working against prevailing attitudes that see history as an arena of texts, discourses, ideologies, and metaphors, De Landa traces the concrete movements and interplays of matter and energy through human populations in the last millennium.De Landa attacks three domains that have given shape to human societies: economics, biology, and linguistics. In every case, what one sees is the self-directed processes of matter and energy interacting with the whim and will of human history itself to form a panoramic vision of the West free of rigid teleology and naive notions of progress, and even more important, free of any deterministic source of its urban, institutional, and technological forms. Rather, the source of all concrete forms in the West's history are shown to derive from internal morphogenetic capabilities that lie within the flow of matter-energy itself.
具體描述
讀後感
这本书大概八年之前读过，之后此书一直放在上海家中压箱底，至今未重见天日。两年之前开始读德兰达的另一本书“A New Philosophy of Society." 本人愚钝，曾经尝试读德勒兹，但觉得更晦涩难解，每每把德兰达当做德勒兹的大众普及版。德兰达的文字要平易许多，基本上如果对近世...
評分三年内借过两次这本书，一直都啃不下来。 因为写论文又把这书翻出来，但是还是啃不下来，实在崩溃。谁写个简评？读书笔记啥的？大家都说是好书，就是看不懂。 我要写多少字以上才允许我发评论啊？ 好吧我再说两句废话，虽然题目写的是history，但是这是一本哲学书。 因为看了...
評分三年内借过两次这本书，一直都啃不下来。 因为写论文又把这书翻出来，但是还是啃不下来，实在崩溃。谁写个简评？读书笔记啥的？大家都说是好书，就是看不懂。 我要写多少字以上才允许我发评论啊？ 好吧我再说两句废话，虽然题目写的是history，但是这是一本哲学书。 因为看了...
評分这本书大概八年之前读过，之后此书一直放在上海家中压箱底，至今未重见天日。两年之前开始读德兰达的另一本书“A New Philosophy of Society." 本人愚钝，曾经尝试读德勒兹，但觉得更晦涩难解，每每把德兰达当做德勒兹的大众普及版。德兰达的文字要平易许多，基本上如果对近世...
評分三年内借过两次这本书，一直都啃不下来。 因为写论文又把这书翻出来，但是还是啃不下来，实在崩溃。谁写个简评？读书笔记啥的？大家都说是好书，就是看不懂。 我要写多少字以上才允许我发评论啊？ 好吧我再说两句废话，虽然题目写的是history，但是这是一本哲学书。 因为看了...
用戶評價
隻怪智商不夠
评分I read the whole book page to page, even managed to translate two chapters of the book. Very Deleuzian. 2 or 3 years later, giving an after thouhgt, I would hold more suspicion on some of the arguments. Nevertheless, a fun book
评分感覺讀瞭一個發散思維的叨叨叨，冗長的章節始於一個還算清晰的開頭，然後就不斷發散，這一下那一下的，最後再圓迴來。主綫是物質能量世界的兩種構成模式相互影響、動態共存，不斷“相變”而非單綫程遞進的非綫性曆史，但真的纏繞太多細碎的內容進去瞭，讀者還得不斷提醒自己注意重點，看著真纍。
评分有種挺好玩也挺閑啊的感覺
评分I have only read the introduction and the first chapter which is most related to architecture. He's made convincing statements of a new philosophical altitude towards history. Also, De Landa's text is a perfect example to learn academic writing.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有