Some of the most brutal and long-lasting civil wars of our time involve the rapid formation and disintegration of alliances among warring groups, as well as fractionalization within them. It would be natural to suppose that warring groups form alliances based on shared identity considerations - such as Christian groups allying with Christian groups - but this is not what we see. Two groups that identify themselves as bitter foes one day, on the basis of some identity narrative, might be allies the next day and vice versa. Nor is any group, however homogeneous, safe from internal fractionalization. Rather, looking closely at the civil wars in Afghanistan and Bosnia and testing against the broader universe of fifty-three cases of multiparty civil wars, Fotini Christia finds that the relative power distribution between and within various warring groups is the primary driving force behind alliance formation, alliance changes, group splits and internal group takeovers.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
2-3 证明的道理挺简单的，利益大于认同，阿富汗的事情还真是复杂
评分2-3 证明的道理挺简单的，利益大于认同，阿富汗的事情还真是复杂
评分2-3 证明的道理挺简单的，利益大于认同，阿富汗的事情还真是复杂
评分2-3 证明的道理挺简单的，利益大于认同，阿富汗的事情还真是复杂
评分2-3 证明的道理挺简单的，利益大于认同，阿富汗的事情还真是复杂
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有