Justifying Intellectual Property pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- 知识产权
- Intellectual
- 罗尔斯
- Property
- Justifying
- 知识产权
- 法律
- 权利归属
- 创新
- 专利
- 版权
- 知识财产
- 产权理论
- 经济激励
- 制度设计
具体描述
Why should a property interest exist in an intangible item? In recent years, arguments over intellectual property have often divided proponents--who emphasize the importance of providing incentives for producers of creative works-- from skeptics who emphasize the need for free and open access to knowledge. In a wide-ranging and ambitious analysis, Robert P. Merges establishes a sophisticated rationale for the most vital form of modern property: IP rights. His insightful new book answers the many critics who contend that these rights are inefficient, unfair, and theoretically incoherent. But Merges' vigorous defense of IP is also a call for appropriate legal constraints and boundaries: IP rights are real, but they come with real limits. Drawing on Kant, Locke, and Rawls as well as contemporary scholars, Merges crafts an original theory to explain why IP rights make sense as a reward for effort and as a way to encourage individuals to strive. He also provides a novel explanation of why awarding IP rights to creative people is fair for everyone else in society, by contributing to a just distribution of resources. Merges argues convincingly that IP rights are based on a solid ethical foundation, and--when subject to fair limits--these rights are an indispensable part of a well-functioning society.
作者简介
Robert P. Merges is Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Professor of Law and Technology, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, and co-founder of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.
目录信息
Part One: Foundations
2 Locke
3 Kant
4 Distributive Justice and IP Rights
Part Two Principles
5 Midlevel Principles of IP Law
6 The Proportionality Principle
Part Three Issues
7 Creative Professionals, Corporate Ownership, and Transaction Costs
8 Property in the Digital Era
9 Patents and Drugs for the Developing World
10 Conclusion: The Future of Property
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
反方辩友。居然所谓铁杆自然权利派，也算难得。有理论雄心，没有历史意识，根本无视知识产权的历史定位和功能运作。第三部分的问题分析可佐材料之用。霍姆斯言：一页历史分析抵过一卷逻辑分析；与作者共勉。
评分反方辩友。居然所谓铁杆自然权利派，也算难得。有理论雄心，没有历史意识，根本无视知识产权的历史定位和功能运作。第三部分的问题分析可佐材料之用。霍姆斯言：一页历史分析抵过一卷逻辑分析；与作者共勉。
评分反方辩友。居然所谓铁杆自然权利派，也算难得。有理论雄心，没有历史意识，根本无视知识产权的历史定位和功能运作。第三部分的问题分析可佐材料之用。霍姆斯言：一页历史分析抵过一卷逻辑分析；与作者共勉。
评分反方辩友。居然所谓铁杆自然权利派，也算难得。有理论雄心，没有历史意识，根本无视知识产权的历史定位和功能运作。第三部分的问题分析可佐材料之用。霍姆斯言：一页历史分析抵过一卷逻辑分析；与作者共勉。
评分反方辩友。居然所谓铁杆自然权利派，也算难得。有理论雄心，没有历史意识，根本无视知识产权的历史定位和功能运作。第三部分的问题分析可佐材料之用。霍姆斯言：一页历史分析抵过一卷逻辑分析；与作者共勉。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有