图书标签: 现代性/现代主义 现代主义 文学理论/批评/研究 文学理论 大三上 English CL 2018
发表于2024-11-26
What Ever Happened to Modernism? pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
The quality of today's literary writing arouses the strongest opinions. For novelist and critic Gabriel Josipovici, the contemporary novel in English is profoundly disappointing - a poor relation of its groundbreaking Modernist forebears. This agile and passionate book asks why. Modernism, Josipovici suggests, is only superficially a reaction to industrialization or a revolution in diction and form; essentially, it is art coming to consciousness of its own limits and responsibilities. And its origins are to be sought not in 1850 or 1800, but in the early 1500s, with the crisis of society and perception that also led to the rise of Protestantism. With sophistication and persuasiveness, Josipovici charts some of Modernism's key stages, from Durer, Rabelais, and Cervantes to the present, bringing together a rich array of artists, musicians, and writers both familiar and unexpected - including Beckett, Borges, Friedrich, Cezanne, Stevens, Robbe-Grillet, Beethoven, and Wordsworth. He concludes with a stinging attack on the current literary scene in Britain and America, which raises questions about not only national taste, but contemporary culture itself.
果然是小说家写的东西,后现代也全部划到现代阵营且一直在为克劳德西蒙诸位打广告…此外就算掉书袋也很不学院派。极好的部分,如堂吉诃德的驱魅与丢勒的画作都很有可发明之处。主线是传统与个人之间的对立:在进入现代之后,失去传统的个人如何在书写中获取自己的authority→少不了的两种现代性。引文很有可观之处,又想读梅洛庞蒂了= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的点:把毕加索/杜尚/艾略特与巴赫金/罗伯格里耶联系起来,The marquise went out at five,对亚里士多德的误读,human→action。但果然还是有点独断?自己有hindsight当然没问题,但也不能强求所有人都脱离传统写作啊。
评分果然是小说家写的东西,后现代也全部划到现代阵营且一直在为克劳德西蒙诸位打广告…此外就算掉书袋也很不学院派。极好的部分,如堂吉诃德的驱魅与丢勒的画作都很有可发明之处。主线是传统与个人之间的对立:在进入现代之后,失去传统的个人如何在书写中获取自己的authority→少不了的两种现代性。引文很有可观之处,又想读梅洛庞蒂了= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的点:把毕加索/杜尚/艾略特与巴赫金/罗伯格里耶联系起来,The marquise went out at five,对亚里士多德的误读,human→action。但果然还是有点独断?自己有hindsight当然没问题,但也不能强求所有人都脱离传统写作啊。
评分果然是小说家写的东西,后现代也全部划到现代阵营且一直在为克劳德西蒙诸位打广告…此外就算掉书袋也很不学院派。极好的部分,如堂吉诃德的驱魅与丢勒的画作都很有可发明之处。主线是传统与个人之间的对立:在进入现代之后,失去传统的个人如何在书写中获取自己的authority→少不了的两种现代性。引文很有可观之处,又想读梅洛庞蒂了= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的点:把毕加索/杜尚/艾略特与巴赫金/罗伯格里耶联系起来,The marquise went out at five,对亚里士多德的误读,human→action。但果然还是有点独断?自己有hindsight当然没问题,但也不能强求所有人都脱离传统写作啊。
评分果然是小说家写的东西,后现代也全部划到现代阵营且一直在为克劳德西蒙诸位打广告…此外就算掉书袋也很不学院派。极好的部分,如堂吉诃德的驱魅与丢勒的画作都很有可发明之处。主线是传统与个人之间的对立:在进入现代之后,失去传统的个人如何在书写中获取自己的authority→少不了的两种现代性。引文很有可观之处,又想读梅洛庞蒂了= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的点:把毕加索/杜尚/艾略特与巴赫金/罗伯格里耶联系起来,The marquise went out at five,对亚里士多德的误读,human→action。但果然还是有点独断?自己有hindsight当然没问题,但也不能强求所有人都脱离传统写作啊。
评分果然是小说家写的东西,后现代也全部划到现代阵营且一直在为克劳德西蒙诸位打广告…此外就算掉书袋也很不学院派。极好的部分,如堂吉诃德的驱魅与丢勒的画作都很有可发明之处。主线是传统与个人之间的对立:在进入现代之后,失去传统的个人如何在书写中获取自己的authority→少不了的两种现代性。引文很有可观之处,又想读梅洛庞蒂了= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的点:把毕加索/杜尚/艾略特与巴赫金/罗伯格里耶联系起来,The marquise went out at five,对亚里士多德的误读,human→action。但果然还是有点独断?自己有hindsight当然没问题,但也不能强求所有人都脱离传统写作啊。
评分
评分
评分
评分
What Ever Happened to Modernism? pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024