图书标签: 国际关系 历史 东亚安全 朝贡体系 海外中国研究 政治学 Tribute System
发表于2024-11-22
East Asia Before the West pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
From the founding of the Ming dynasty in 1368 to the start of the Opium Wars in 1841, China has engaged in only two large-scale conflicts with its principal neighbors, Korea, Vietnam, and Japan. These four territorial and centralized states have otherwise fostered peaceful and long-lasting relationships with one another, and as they have grown more powerful, the atmosphere around them has stabilized.
Focusing on the role of the "tribute system" in maintaining stability in East Asia and in fostering diplomatic and commercial exchange, Kang contrasts this history against the example of Europe and the East Asian states' skirmishes with nomadic peoples to the north and west. Although China has been the unquestioned hegemon in the region, with other political units always considered secondary, the tributary order entailed military, cultural, and economic dimensions that afforded its participants immense latitude. Europe's "Westphalian" system, on the other hand, was based on formal equality among states and balance-of-power politics, resulting in incessant interstate conflict.
Scholars tend to view Europe's experience as universal, but Kang upends this tradition, emphasizing East Asia's formal hierarchy as an international system with its own history and character. This approach not only recasts our understanding of East Asian relations but also defines a model that applies to other hegemonies outside the European order.
康灿雄,美国南加州大学国际关系与贸易教授、韩国研究所主任,曾为跨国公司和政府提供咨询服务。
陈昌煦,北京大学外交学博士,北京大学中国战略研究中心主任助理。
这书怎么说,刚看了几页我就觉得这书看不下去了.典型一瓶子还不满呢,半瓶子就开始咣当的部分美国学者著作的特点.作者一上来就说这不是历史书,是本探讨国际政治的书(有逃避责任的嫌疑),依据的史料大部分不是一手的,是二手的,作者本科研究生专业都是欧洲政治,自己看不懂中日文引用的资料的质和量都令人怀疑,那还搞啥朝贡体系研究.提的问题是很好,可是分析鸦片战争前的东亚国际政治又说这不是关于历史的书,前后矛盾啊~结论部分做的不太好,逻辑链的导出有问题~但是同意结论的观点.
评分作者是研究国际关系而非历史,所以主要运用二手资料。从现实出现在历史中寻找东亚较少发生战争的原因:主要是一个共同认可的儒家思想和朝贡体系(而朝贡体系基本是国与国之间的贸易),感觉有点简化历史。最后的conclusion不知道是为了好出版还是如何,说中国虽然很强,可是还是不太可能做东亚的霸主,因为美国不允许 (????)
评分没看之前就觉得扯淡,看完更觉得是扯淡。一个自承开始项目前连基本常识都不懂的学者,还是算了
评分这书怎么说,刚看了几页我就觉得这书看不下去了.典型一瓶子还不满呢,半瓶子就开始咣当的部分美国学者著作的特点.作者一上来就说这不是历史书,是本探讨国际政治的书(有逃避责任的嫌疑),依据的史料大部分不是一手的,是二手的,作者本科研究生专业都是欧洲政治,自己看不懂中日文引用的资料的质和量都令人怀疑,那还搞啥朝贡体系研究.提的问题是很好,可是分析鸦片战争前的东亚国际政治又说这不是关于历史的书,前后矛盾啊~结论部分做的不太好,逻辑链的导出有问题~但是同意结论的观点.
评分Looks who just discovered America in 2010! 要讲历史却毫无历史观,对历史事件的解读太肤浅。我可以接受只讲四国之间的关系,但即使是四国间的变数也已经大到他的理论无法解释,更不用说要apply到整个东亚。在分析壬辰之后的日本对朝心态时竟然引用韩国学者的结论。
观点还是挺鲜明的。感觉研究东亚各国关系史最大的麻烦就是是否能找出一个完全覆盖住所有时期所有事例的框架,也就是说,总是有例外出现。不过历史本身就是流动的,朝贡体制就像一件外衣,不可能时时都符合体型。 个人比较赞同东亚各国(尤其是网络上)有关历史文化的争论与冲突...
评分观点还是挺鲜明的。感觉研究东亚各国关系史最大的麻烦就是是否能找出一个完全覆盖住所有时期所有事例的框架,也就是说,总是有例外出现。不过历史本身就是流动的,朝贡体制就像一件外衣,不可能时时都符合体型。 个人比较赞同东亚各国(尤其是网络上)有关历史文化的争论与冲突...
评分Eurocentrism is prevalent in developing theories of international relations, most notably exemplified by the central concept of sovereignty in the Westphalian system, which is labeled with equality in interstate relations. David Kang challenges this bias by...
评分Eurocentrism is prevalent in developing theories of international relations, most notably exemplified by the central concept of sovereignty in the Westphalian system, which is labeled with equality in interstate relations. David Kang challenges this bias by...
评分Eurocentrism is prevalent in developing theories of international relations, most notably exemplified by the central concept of sovereignty in the Westphalian system, which is labeled with equality in interstate relations. David Kang challenges this bias by...
East Asia Before the West pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024