具體描述
Factionalism and internal division is a cross that virtually all dominant political parties operating in representative democracies have to bear. In this book, Dr Boucek seeks to explain how this inherent factionalism that has caused the downfall of many political leaders can also prolong office tenure by containing conflict and preventing the exit of party dissidents. By surveying the British Conservative Party, the Liberal Party of Canada, the Christian Democratic Party of Italy and the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan, Dr Boucek explores this paradox and the potential dangers factional politics can create for dominant political parties through bad governance, brand devaluation and the failure to manage internal conflict. Factional Politics is essential reading for students and scholars of political parties and party systems, parliaments and democracy as well as intra-party politics.
著者簡介
FRANÇOISE BOUCEK is a Teaching Fellow in European Politics in the School of Politics and International Relations at Queen Mary University of London, a Visiting Professor at the University of Witten Herdecke (Germany) and an Associate of the LSE Public Policy Group. Her research interests include political parties and party systems, party government and representative democracy.
圖書目錄
Acknowledgements
Introduction
1. The Theory of One-Party Dominance
2. Why Does One-Party Dominance End in Factionalism
3. Majoritarian Democracies: Executive-Dominated Britain and Decentralised Canada
4. Case 1 - The Thatcher-Major Factional Wars Over Europe
5. Case 2 - The Demise of Canadian Liberal Hegemony
6. Non-Majoritarian Democracies: Centrifugal Italy and Consensual Japan
7. Case 3 - Italy's Christian Democrats: How Factional Capture Bred Self-Destruction
8. Case 4 - The Liberal Democratic Party of Japan (1955-2009): End of Hegemony
Conclusion: How Parties Succeed or Fail to Manage Factionalism and Stay in Power
Notes
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
被嚇哭瞭，且不論英，加，意，日這是個國傢有多大的可比性，仔細看瞭日本這一章，除去沒有日文文獻和資料不說，這不就是把LDP過去50多年，重述瞭一遍麼？ repetitive .... 據說這博士論文還拿奬瞭。。。LSE也不帶這麼玩的吧？（好嘛，人傢的關鍵概念最後還是算子自說自話瞭。）
评分被嚇哭瞭，且不論英，加，意，日這是個國傢有多大的可比性，仔細看瞭日本這一章，除去沒有日文文獻和資料不說，這不就是把LDP過去50多年，重述瞭一遍麼？ repetitive .... 據說這博士論文還拿奬瞭。。。LSE也不帶這麼玩的吧？（好嘛，人傢的關鍵概念最後還是算子自說自話瞭。）
评分被嚇哭瞭，且不論英，加，意，日這是個國傢有多大的可比性，仔細看瞭日本這一章，除去沒有日文文獻和資料不說，這不就是把LDP過去50多年，重述瞭一遍麼？ repetitive .... 據說這博士論文還拿奬瞭。。。LSE也不帶這麼玩的吧？（好嘛，人傢的關鍵概念最後還是算子自說自話瞭。）
评分被嚇哭瞭，且不論英，加，意，日這是個國傢有多大的可比性，仔細看瞭日本這一章，除去沒有日文文獻和資料不說，這不就是把LDP過去50多年，重述瞭一遍麼？ repetitive .... 據說這博士論文還拿奬瞭。。。LSE也不帶這麼玩的吧？（好嘛，人傢的關鍵概念最後還是算子自說自話瞭。）
评分被嚇哭瞭，且不論英，加，意，日這是個國傢有多大的可比性，仔細看瞭日本這一章，除去沒有日文文獻和資料不說，這不就是把LDP過去50多年，重述瞭一遍麼？ repetitive .... 據說這博士論文還拿奬瞭。。。LSE也不帶這麼玩的吧？（好嘛，人傢的關鍵概念最後還是算子自說自話瞭。）
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有