Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God

Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2026

出版者:Pozzi Pres Corp
作者:Thieblot, Robert J.
出品人:
頁數:781
译者:
出版時間:1997-8
價格:31.95
裝幀:Paperback
isbn號碼:9780965946506
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 奇幻
  • 神話
  • 不朽
  • 冒險
  • 迴憶錄
  • 神祇
  • 命運
  • 自我發現
  • 史詩
  • 文學
想要找書就要到 小美書屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

具體描述

Telemachus comprises the memoirs of Telemachus who was born in Athens about the year 314 B.C. He is of semidivine origin, having the mortal Demetrius of Phaleron for a father and the goddess Xanthippe of Paestum for a mother.

Demetrius of Phaleron was a peripatetic philosopher, author and politician who was made governor of Athens by Cassander of Macedon in 318 B.C. Driven from power ten years later, he sought refuge in Alexandria. Telemachus was thus raised in Alexandria, something he refers to in his memoirs, but only in passing. Xanthippe of Paestum is a goddess of Magna Graecia, the Greek diaspora into southern Italy. She has to a considerable measure overcome her obscure origins by her beauty and intelligence. Zeus finds her fetching and accords her privileges she would not otherwise have. This has caused resentment in Hades, Lord of the Underworld. His antipathy extends to her son as well, whom he accuses of meddling in human (mortal) affairs. The gods know that men create gods, not gods men. They, in fact, differ little from their creators, except that they are incorporeal, and by reason of that, immortal. Their power over men is the power of illusion.

In the heaven of the immortal gods reigns Zeus (Jupiter to the Latins) who is addressed as "Patroisos" (Father). From behind a mask of affability he jealously guards his power and would be ruthless in suppressing dissent.

It was in the early Roman Empire that the gods became alarmed by the proliferation of religious ideas of a largely irrational, fantastic and redemptory nature. They feared this adulteration would extend to themselves, that mortals would imagine them in a different way, and as imagined they would be changed.

When Patroisos learned of the Emperor Commodus (A.D. 161-192) shuffling humbly behind the priests of Isis cradling in his arms the image of a monkey god, he knew the time had come to disengage. The result was the Decree of Separation, which in essence forbids immortals congress with mortals. To the extent the gods maintain a presence among mortals, it is only one of surveillance-absent exceptional circumstances. The decree has much incommoded Telemachus, who finds the heaven of the gods boring and yearns to observe the human condition.

The memoirs commence with an audience with Patroisos and end with one. The period is about a year, January 1794-January 1795. The reason for the first audience is the report of an odd occurrence in a France theretofore deemed safely Christian. Patroisos speaks of Lutetia. Telemachus knows he means Paris. What happened in Paris was the crowning of a Goddess of Reason in what had been the Cathedral of Notre Dame. Telemachus, as he learns to his delight, is to be sent to explore this dangerous phenomenon. In fact, it was just a matter of anti-Christian posturing by the atheist Hebert and his "enrages," the most extreme of French Revolutionary factions.

In this and other audiences, Patroisos and Telemachus are given to dissimulation. Patroisos pretends Telemachus finds association with mortals unpleasant and claims he much regrets the necessity of sending him forth into the real world (the world of mortals) to do this or that. When he orders him home, he thanks him profusely. Telemachus, for his part, plays upon his master's fears, exaggerates the danger to Olympian institutions posed by mortals' thoughts about the gods, and is quite prepared to concoct stories to frighten his master, to the enlargement of his liberty.

Telemachus is very aware that power corrupts. He is unabashedly republican, believing a well ordered republic best for the protection of liberty. That the gods are different from men, the created from their creators, he knows to be false. Yet, nowhere in the memoirs does he suggest that anything other than absolutism (the absolutism of Patroisos) is appropriate for the immortal gods. What constrains him is fear. That he is himself subject to institutions which accord no right to liberty may well explain his strong preference for liberty and its protections in mortal affairs.

Much of the memoirs are retrospective. While they begin and end in the French Revolution, they cover much more. "It was," as Telemachus put it, "the rebirth of learning which, as it liberated mortals, liberated me." The year was 1340 and what frightened Patroisos was garbled intelligence of the doings of Petrarch, a mortal in love with the past, with classical antiquity, possibly then also with the religion of classical antiquity, the religion of the Olympian gods. It was a fear Telemachus was to feed. Given by a frightened master an exemption from the Decree of Separation, he was to spend nearly 250 years in the real world of his delight, free to do there nearly whatever he liked. In that time he served various popes, intervened in the political affairs of Florence, studied and admired the Venetian Republic, and also studied its opposite, as it were, the tyranny of the Ottoman Turks. As a Knight Hospitaler, he would resist them on Malta and be present at Lepanto, witness to the victory there. Sent to France in the spring of 1794, he actually arrived after the death of Hebert (guillotined at the instigation of Robespierre). Conspiring with the terrorist Fouche, he set about the destruction of Robespierre and Saint-Just. Succeeding in that, he threw himself into post-Thermidorian politics, but was too soon thereafter recalled.

In the audience that ends the memoirs, Patroisos and Telemachus (typically) view the world in different ways. Patroisos is pleased, but not because the Robespierrist tyranny has come to an end. He is pleased because the end of Robespierre ended also his cult of the Supreme Being. Telemachus is very aware that this Supreme Being was but an oddity of the megalomania of Robespierre and no threat to Olympus. Yet, smiling knowingly, he does nothing to dispel the useful delusion of the Father of the Gods.

好的,以下是一份關於《Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God》的圖書簡介,不包含書中內容,力求詳細且自然: --- 《不朽之神的漫憶錄:忒勒瑪科斯》—— 一部超越時空的史詩側影 探索人類存在的極限,品味永恒的孤獨與智慧的重量。 《不朽之神的漫憶錄:忒勒瑪科斯》(Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God)並非一部簡單的神話再述,而是一部沉靜而宏大的哲學沉思錄,它以一種近乎冷峻的筆觸,描繪瞭“永生”這一概念在個體生命中投下的漫長陰影。本書拒絕迎閤大眾對神祇光輝燦爛的刻闆印象,轉而深入探究一位存在於時間洪流之外的生命體,在無數次文明興衰、滄海桑田之間,如何維持其心智的完整性,以及如何看待那轉瞬即逝的“凡人”經驗。 超越曆史的視角:時間不再是衡量尺度 本書的敘事結構極為獨特,它並非按照綫性時間推進,而是以一係列碎片化的“印記”和“迴響”構建而成。讀者將被引導進入一個由無數個時代碎片拼接而成的意識迷宮。忒勒瑪科斯,這位被賦予瞭永恒生命的個體,其記憶庫中儲存著從文明的曙光到現代的每一次重大轉摺的細微感知。他目睹瞭巴比倫的沙塵如何掩埋宏偉的塔尖,目睹瞭亞曆山大的徵途如何最終匯入無聲的遺忘,也目睹瞭那些短暫而熾熱的愛戀如何如流星般劃過夜空,最終歸於寂滅。 這本書的魅力在於,它拒絕提供一個全知全能的上帝視角。忒勒瑪科斯的視角是獨特的,他既是觀察者,也是無法真正融入的局外人。他所記錄的,不是宏大的戰爭編年史,而是那些在曆史巨輪碾過時幸存下來的微小細節——一首失傳的挽歌的韻律,一座被遺忘的祭壇上苔蘚的顔色,一個瀕死哲學傢在黃昏時留下的最後一句箴言。這些片段共同構建瞭一種對“存在”的深刻拷問:當一切都將消逝,唯有你獨自留下時,事物的價值何在? 孤獨的重量與智慧的代價 永生並非恩賜,而是一種沉重的負擔。本書細膩地剖析瞭忒勒瑪科斯在漫長歲月中對“失去”的適應過程。早期的他,或許像任何年輕的生命一樣,對世間萬物充滿熱情,試圖參與和改變;然而,數韆年過去,他學會瞭抽離。每一段深厚的情感聯結,都預示著未來必然的、難以承受的告彆。他目睹瞭摯友的衰老、信徒的背叛、理想的腐朽,每一次“告彆”都在他心智的深處刻下新的紋路。 這種永恒的疏離感,迫使忒勒瑪科斯發展齣一種近乎冷酷的、純粹的智性生存方式。他不再追逐世俗的權力和欲望,而是將自己的全部精力投入到對“真理”的探尋中。書中的章節常以對某種哲學思辨的闡述開始或結束,這些思辨並非晦澀難懂的學院派論述,而是從親曆曆史中提煉齣的、帶著人間煙火氣的洞察。他思考著:秩序與混亂的邊界在哪裏?美與醜的相對性如何隨時代而變幻?時間本身是否隻是一種錯覺? 文體與氛圍:一麯低沉的挽歌 《忒勒瑪科斯》的寫作風格是其核心價值之一。它模仿瞭某種古典的、近乎拉丁語散文的莊重感,但又不失現代語法的精確性。文字如同一塊經過韆年打磨的玉石,錶麵溫潤,內裏卻沉澱著無法穿透的密度。敘事節奏時而緩慢得如同冰川移動,讓讀者有時間去體會每一個詞語背後的滄桑;時而又因一個突然浮現的強烈情感衝擊而陡然加速,展現齣永生者內心深處尚未完全熄滅的火花。 本書的基調是內斂的、略帶憂鬱的,如同在月光下獨自閱讀一本泛黃的古籍。它不是一本提供簡單答案的讀物,而是一麵映照讀者內心對“時間、愛、意義”這些終極命題的鏡子。通過忒勒瑪科斯無可比擬的生命長度,讀者得以從一個全新的、宏大的維度重新審視自己的短暫而珍貴的生命軌跡。 適閤的讀者 本書獻給所有對人類文明的深度、哲學的恒久性,以及存在主義的睏境抱有強烈好奇心的讀者。如果您著迷於那些跨越時代的偉大思想,欣賞那些文字蘊含的復雜層次和豐富內涵,並願意投入時間去品味一段關於“不朽”的沉靜獨白,那麼《忒勒瑪科斯》將是一場不容錯過的精神旅程。它不是讓你逃離現實的奇幻故事,而是讓你以更深刻的眼光迴歸現實的史詩側影。 ---

著者簡介

圖書目錄

讀後感

評分

評分

評分

評分

評分

用戶評價

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有