An effective democratic society depends on the confidence citizens place in their government. Payment of taxes, acceptance of legislative and judicial decisions, compliance with social service programs, and support of military objectives are but some examples of the need for public cooperation with state demands. At the same time, voters expect their officials to behave ethically and responsibly. To those seeking to understand—and to improve—this mutual responsiveness, Trust and Governance provides a wide-ranging inquiry into the role of trust in civic life.
Trust and Governance asks several important questions: Is trust really essential to good governance, or are strong laws more important? What leads people either to trust or to distrust government, and what makes officials decide to be trustworthy? Can too much trust render the public vulnerable to government corruption, and if so what safeguards are necessary? In approaching these questions, the contributors draw upon an abundance of historical and current resources to offer a variety of perspectives on the role of trust in government. For some, trust between citizens and government is a rational compact based on a fair exchange of information and the public's ability to evaluate government performance. Levi and Daunton each examine how the establishment of clear goals and accountability procedures within government agencies facilitates greater public commitment, evidence that a strong government can itself be a source of trust. Conversely, Jennings and Peel offer two cases in which loss of citizen confidence resulted from the administration of seemingly unresponsive, punitive social service programs.
Other contributors to Trust and Governance view trust as a social bonding, wherein the public's emotional investment in government becomes more important than their ability to measure its performance. The sense of being trusted by voters can itself be a powerful incentive for elected officials to behave ethically, as Blackburn, Brennan, and Pettit each demonstrate. Other authors explore how a sense of communal identity and shared values make citizens more likely to eschew their own self-interest and favor the government as a source of collective good. Underlying many of these essays is the assumption that regulatory institutions are necessary to protect citizens from the worst effects of misplaced trust. Trust and Governance offers evidence that the jurisdictional level at which people and government interact—be it federal, state, or local—is fundamental to whether trust is rationally or socially based. Although social trust is more prevalent at the local level, both forms of trust may be essential to a healthy society.
Enriched by perspectives from political science, sociology, psychology, economics, history, and philosophy, Trust and Governance opens a new dialogue on the role of trust in the vital relationship between citizenry and government.
VALERIE BRAITHWAITE is associate director of the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. She is also coordinator of the Trust Strand of the Reshaping Australian Institutions Project in the Research School of Social Sciences.
MARGARET LEVI is professor of political science and Harry Bridges Chair in Labor Studies, University of Washington, Seattle. She is also director of the University of Washington Center for Labor Studies.
评分
评分
评分
评分
从文学角度来看,这本书的结构设计堪称一绝。它采用了多线叙事的技巧,将不同时间线、不同文化背景下的冲突场景巧妙地并置在一起,形成了一种强烈的对照效果。虽然我阅读的这本书的主线聚焦于艺术史中的风格演变与赞助人制度,但其中所蕴含的关于“权威的授予与撤销”的讨论,与任何形式的组织管理都息息相关。作者对“可见性”和“隐藏性”的对比运用达到了炉火纯青的地步,比如,当一个权力中心变得过于张扬时,它内部的腐蚀往往加速;反之,当它选择退入幕后,通过代理人进行运作时,其控制力反而可能达到更深远的渗透。这种对权力运作隐秘面的挖掘,让我对任何宣称透明的机构都保持了一份健康的怀疑。它没有提供具体的操作手册,但它提供了一种观察世界的独特棱镜,让那些陈旧的权力结构在新的光线下暴露无遗。
评分这本书的阅读体验简直是一场思维的探险,虽然我手头上的这本并没有提及“Trust and Governance”这个具体主题,但它所探讨的那些深层次的社会结构、权力运作的微妙之处,与治理的核心议题有着异曲同工之妙。作者以一种近乎解剖学的精准,剖析了在一个高度互联的社会中,信息流动的路径如何重塑了集体信念的形成过程。我尤其欣赏其对“共识的脆弱性”这一概念的阐述,那种将宏大的社会运动细化到个体决策层面的叙事方式,让人不禁反思自己日常所接受的信息是如何被过滤和构建的。书中引入了大量的历史案例,从古代城邦的契约精神到现代跨国组织的决策失误,每一个例子都支撑着一个核心论点:任何稳定的系统,无论其技术多么先进,其基石仍然是那些无形的、难以量化的信任纽带。读完后,我感觉自己对新闻的解读能力提升了好几个档次,不再是轻易被表象所迷惑,而是开始追问背后的利益驱动力和权力平衡。
评分这本书的语言风格极其鲜明,充满了冷峻的讽刺和不动声色的批判。它不像一本严肃的学术著作,更像是一位饱经世故的观察者,用近乎戏谑的笔调记录下人类在面对资源分配不均时所展现出的集体无能。我记得其中一段描绘一个虚构的城市如何因为对一项新技术的过度依赖而最终崩溃的场景,那种慢镜头式的灾难描绘,让人不寒而栗。这种对系统性失败的描绘,虽然在书中被包装成一个科幻寓言,但其对人类在危机决策中的短视和偏见分析,完全可以映射到现实中的任何大型项目管理失败。它成功地将抽象的管理学理论,转化为令人信服的、充满画面感的叙事体验。对于我来说,这本书的价值在于,它用极具冲击力的方式,提醒了我任何精心设计的规则体系,都可能在人性最基本的情绪面前不堪一击。
评分这本作品的深度,在于它对“契约精神”在现代社会中被稀释过程的细腻描摹。书中的主要内容围绕着一个偏远社区在面对外部资本入侵时所经历的法律与道德困境展开,探讨了当传统社会规范与现代法律条文发生冲突时,个体应如何定位自身。我特别注意到作者对“沉默的同意”这一概念的反复审视,即在缺乏明确反对的情况下,不作为是否等同于授权。这种对集体默认状态的质疑,其实直接指向了治理体系中最为薄弱的环节——那些未经充分讨论、仅凭惯例维持的运作模式。它迫使读者去思考,一个健康的社会结构,究竟需要多少主动的、持续的、有意识的维护。这本书没有提供一个明确的“治理模型”,但它通过展示模型失效的无数种方式,提供了一种更深层次的、关于维护社会稳定所需的持续警觉性的教育。
评分这本书的文笔流畅而富有哲思,与其说它是在讲述一个明确的故事线,不如说它更像是一系列精妙的哲学思辨的集合。我发现自己经常需要停下来,在书页间来回翻阅,去消化那些关于“边界”和“合法性”的讨论。例如,作者花了大量的篇幅去探讨技术伦理的灰色地带,特别是当自动化决策系统开始承担起传统上需要人类判断和道德考量的角色时,那种责任的真空地带是如何产生的。这种对未来社会治理模式的预见性描绘,虽然没有直接使用“治理”这个词汇,但其对制度失效和规范缺失的深刻洞察,无疑触及了现代社会最棘手的管理难题。它的叙事节奏时而如急流般迅猛,时而又慢得像是在太空中漂浮,迫使读者放慢呼吸,去体会那些潜藏在日常喧嚣之下的结构性张力。对于那些习惯于简单是非题的读者来说,这本书可能会带来一定的挑战,因为它提供的不是答案,而是更复杂、更精妙的问题框架。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有