This collection of 24 essays, written by eminent philosophers and political theorists, brings together fresh debates on some of the most fundamental questions in contemporary political philosophy, including human rights, equality, constitutionalism, the value of democracy, identity and political neutrality. * Presents fresh debates on six of the fundamental questions in contemporary political philosophy* Each question is treated by a pair of opposing essays written by eminent scholars* Lively debate format sharply defines the issues, invites the reader to participate in the exchange of arguments and paves the way for further discussion* Will serve as an accessible introduction to the major topics in political philosophy, whilst also capturing the imagination of professional philosophers* Offers the unique opportunity to observe leading philosophers engaging in head-to-head debate
评分
评分
评分
评分
Anderson的那篇Democracy: intrumental vs. non-instrumental value写的真是好。我越来越觉得民主本身不具有什么instrumental value了,除了那种每个人的意见都会被尊重的平等感。本来是想借上课理一理自己的思路的,结果看了这些debate更晕了,觉得自己一无所知。
评分Anderson的那篇Democracy: intrumental vs. non-instrumental value写的真是好。我越来越觉得民主本身不具有什么instrumental value了,除了那种每个人的意见都会被尊重的平等感。本来是想借上课理一理自己的思路的,结果看了这些debate更晕了,觉得自己一无所知。
评分这大概就算是罗尔斯之后,自由民主在施特劳斯所预言的那个意义上的“补课”吧。
评分Anderson的那篇Democracy: intrumental vs. non-instrumental value写的真是好。我越来越觉得民主本身不具有什么instrumental value了,除了那种每个人的意见都会被尊重的平等感。本来是想借上课理一理自己的思路的,结果看了这些debate更晕了,觉得自己一无所知。
评分Anderson的那篇Democracy: intrumental vs. non-instrumental value写的真是好。我越来越觉得民主本身不具有什么instrumental value了,除了那种每个人的意见都会被尊重的平等感。本来是想借上课理一理自己的思路的,结果看了这些debate更晕了,觉得自己一无所知。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有