具体描述
Let the Judges tell your students how they reach a verdict.
Thoroughly revised, with expanded historical and international coverage, Judges on Judging offers insights into the judicial philosophies and political views of those on the bench. In this wide-ranging collection, Supreme Court justices, as well as lower federal and state court judges, discuss the judicial process, constitutional and statutory interpretation, judicial federalism, and the role of the judiciary. New selections come from such distinguished jurists as Judge Jerome Frank (U.S. Court of Appeals), Judge D. Brock Hornby (U.S. District Court), Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. (Supreme Court of the United States), Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo (Supreme Court of the United States), and Chief Justice Aharon Barak (Supreme Court of Israel). With updated introductions to provide readers with necessary thematic and historical context, this book is the perfect supplement to present a nuanced view of the judiciary.
Testimonials
“Judges on Judging is an invaluable and stimulating resource for anyone interested in gaining insight into the role of courts and judges in American government. It provides both basic information about how the courts operate and contrasting views about the ‘proper’ role for judges, all in the words of distinguished members of the judicial branch.” - James Todd, University of Arizona
“My students appreciate that Judges on Judging gives them the opportunity to read the views of actual judges on the topics we discuss in class. The selections add a rich, first-hand perspective to the other assigned material and provide an authentic ‘voice’ to key points of philosophical, constitutional, and analytical dispute throughout the course.” - Mark Petracca, University of California, Irvine
“Judges on Judging assembles a unique collection of extra-judicial writings by American judges--federal and state, appellate and trial, past and present--and organizes them around themes all students of judicial process would be expected to master. Inviting O’Brien’s judges to be ‘guest lecturers’ in my course has encouraged my students to think critically about the relationship between theory and practice, that is, how the leading theories on judicial process and behavior in the academic literature can be squared with the ‘views from the bench.’” - Michael C. Tolley, Northeastern University
作者简介
David M. O'Brien is Leone Reaves and George W. Spicer Professor of Government and Foreign Affairs at the University of Virginia. He has served as a Judicial Fellow and a research associate in the Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice at the Supreme Court. He is author and coauthor of numerous books, including To Dream of Dreams: Religious Freedom and Constitutional Politics in Postwar Japan (1996), Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, 6th edition (2003) which won the American Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award, the two-volume casebook, Constitutional Law and Politics, 5th edition (2003), and the annual Supreme Court Watch.
目录信息
Introduction
1. The Doctrine of Judicial Review: Mr. Marshall, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. Marbury
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
Supreme Court of the United States
2. The Supreme Court in the American System of Government
Justice Robert H. Jackson
Supreme Court of the United States
Part II. The Dynamics of the Judicial Process
Introduction
3. Advice and Consent in Theory and Practice
Judge Roger J. Miner
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
4. The ‘Fight’ Theory Versus the ‘Truth’ Theory
Judge Jerome Frank
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
5. The Adversary Judge: The Experience of the Trial
Judge Judge Marvin E. Frankel
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
6. The Business of the U.S. District Courts
Judge D. Brock Hornby
U.S. District Court, District of Maine
7. What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making
Judge Alex Kozinski
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
8. Whose Federal Judiciary Is It Anyway?
Judge Stephen Reinhardt
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
9. What Really Goes on at the Supreme Court
Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
10. The Supreme Court’s Conference
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist
Supreme Court of the United States
11. Deciding What to Decide: The Docket and the Rule of Four
Justice John Paul Stevens
Supreme Court of the United States
12. The Role of Oral Argument
Justice John M. Harlan II
Supreme Court of the United States
13. Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary (2007)
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
Part III. The Judiciary and the Constitution
Introduction
14. The Path of Law
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Supreme Court of the United States
15. The Judge as a Legislator
Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo
Supreme Court of the United States
16. The Notion of a Living Constitution
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist
Supreme Court of the United States
17. A Relativistic Constitution
Judge William Wayne Justice
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
18. The Jurisprudence of Judicial Restraint: A Return to the Moorings
Judge J. Clifford Wallace
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
19. Tradition and Morality in Constitutional Law
Judge Robert H. Bork
U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
20. What Am I, a Potted Plant? The Case Against Strict Constructionism
Judge Richard A. Posner
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
21. Originalism: The Lesser Evil
Justice Antonin Scalia
Supreme Court of the United States
22. The Constitution: A Living Document
Justice Thurgood Marshall
Supreme Court of the United States
23. The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
24. Speaking in a Judicial Voice: Reflections on Roe v. Wade
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Supreme Court of the United States
25. Our Democratic Constitution
Justice Stephen G. Breyer
Supreme Court of the United States
26. Against Constitutional Theory
Judge Richard A. Posner
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
27. The Importance of Comparative Law
Chief Justice Aharon Barak
Supreme Court of Israel
28. The Two Faces of Judicial Activism
Judge William Wayne Justice
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Part IV. The Judiciary and Federal Regulation: Line Drawing and Statutory Interpretation
Introduction
29. Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes
Justice Felix Frankfurter
Supreme Court of the United States
30. What Does Legislative History Tell Us?
Judge Frank H. Easterbrook
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Part V. Our Dual Constitutional System: The Bill of Rights and the States
Introduction
31. The Bill of Rights
Justice Hugo L. Black
Supreme Court of the United States
32. Guardians of Our Liberties--State Courts No Less than Federal
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
33. First Things First: Rediscovering the States’ Bills of Rights
Justice Hans A. Linde
Oregon State Supreme Court
34. State Courts at the Dawn of a New Century: Common Law Courts Reading Statutes and Constitutions Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye
New York Court of Appeals
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
《Judges on Judging》这个书名，对我而言，就像是通往法官内心世界的一把金钥匙。我一直对司法体系的运作有着浓厚的兴趣，而法官，无疑是整个体系中最核心、也最受关注的角色。我常常在想，是什么样的特质和经历，能让一个人成为公正的裁决者？在那些充满挑战和压力的审判过程中，法官们是如何进行思考和决策的？这本书，是否能为我提供一个深入了解法官内心世界的机会？我渴望知道，他们是如何在纷繁复杂的案情中，辨析真相，权衡利弊，并最终作出一个既符合法律规定，又能体现社会公义的判决。我特别想了解，当面对一些极具争议或涉及复杂伦理问题的案件时，法官们是如何进行思考的？他们是否会参考其他的判例，或者是否会受到个人经验的影响？我希望这本书能够让我更深刻地理解“司法公正”的意义，以及法官们在实现这一目标过程中所付出的努力。这本书，能否让我感受到那些在审判席上运筹帷幄的法官的独特魅力？
评分长期以来，我对于司法判决的形成过程一直抱有极大的好奇心。《Judges on Judging》这个书名，恰好戳中了我的兴趣点。我总是在想，法官在审理案件时，究竟会经历怎样的心路历程？他们是如何消化海量的案件事实、证据材料，并将其与复杂的法律条文相结合，最终形成一个令自己和他人信服的判决？这本书，是否能够为我提供一个独特的窗口，让我能够进入法官的内心世界，去感受他们的思考模式和价值取向？我期待能够从中了解，法官们是如何应对不同类型案件的挑战，例如那些充满道德困境或涉及敏感社会议题的案件。我希望能够更深刻地理解，法官在作出判决时，是如何在法律的确定性与社会变迁的动态性之间找到平衡的。这本书，是否能让我感受到法官们在职业生涯中所承受的压力，以及他们是如何在压力下保持独立和公正？我渴望通过这本书，去领略那些在法庭上运筹帷幄、做出公正裁决的智者风采。
评分我对《Judges on Judging》这本书的期待，源自于我对司法判决背后思考过程的好奇。在日常生活中，我们接触到的往往是案件的最终结果——那一纸判决书。然而，我深知，在那个结果的背后，必然隐藏着一段漫长而严谨的思考过程。法官们如何在浩如烟海的法律条文中找到最恰当的适用，如何权衡不同证据的轻重，如何理解当事人的诉求，又如何在法律框架内做出符合社会公义的裁决？这本书，是否能够为我一一解答这些疑问？我渴望了解，当面对涉及生命、财产、自由等重大利益的案件时，法官们内心的考量是如何进行的。是否存在一种“法官的直觉”，又或者，一切都必须遵循一套严谨的逻辑推理？我希望通过阅读这本书，能够更加透彻地理解“司法公正”这个概念，不仅仅是形式上的公正，更是实质上的公平。我想知道，那些在审判席上做出影响深远决定的法官，他们是如何看待自己的职业，又是如何去平衡法律原则与社会现实之间的张力的。这本书，是否能让我窥见他们作为“裁判者”的内心世界，了解他们是如何进行“审判”的？
评分自从上次在书店偶然瞥见《Judges on Judging》的书名，它便如同一个神秘的邀请，在我心中萦绕不去。我一直对法律的运行机制充满浓厚的兴趣，而法官，无疑是这个庞大体系中最关键的核心人物。我常常在想，在那些庄严的法庭之上，当案件的证据链条条分析，当双方的辩护唇枪舌剑，当社会公众的目光聚焦于此，法官是如何做出最终判决的？他们的判断标准究竟是什么？是纯粹的法律逻辑，还是会受到个人经验、社会认知，甚至是情感因素的影响？这本书，是否能够为我提供一个独特的视角，让我能够站在法官的立场上，去审视那些错综复杂的案件？我希望能在这本书中，找到对“司法独立”更具象化的解释，理解它在实际操作中是如何体现的，又面临着怎样的挑战。更重要的是，我期待这本书能够让我更深刻地理解，公正的司法不仅仅是冰冷的规则执行，更是一种对人类社会秩序和公平正义的承诺。我希望这本书能给我带来启发，让我对法官这个职业，对整个司法系统，有一个更全面、更人性化的认识。
评分读到《Judges on Judging》这个书名，我立刻被它所吸引。它不是那种枯燥的法律教材，也不是简单的案件汇编，而是直指“审判”的核心——那些做出判决的“法官”本身。我一直对法官这个群体充满好奇，他们身处维护社会秩序的权力核心，却又必须严守中立和公正的原则。我非常想知道，究竟是什么样的品质和能力，使得一个人能够胜任如此重要的角色？这本书，是否能够为我揭示法官们在面对疑难案件时，他们的分析方法和判断逻辑？我希望了解，他们是如何在法律的条文和案件的实际情况之间找到最佳的契合点，从而做出一个既合法又合乎情理的判决。更让我好奇的是，在作出每一个重要判决时，法官们内心是否也曾有过挣扎和权衡？这本书，是否能够让我窥见他们作为“人”的一面，理解他们在恪守职业道德的同时，也需要面对复杂的人性考量？我期待这本书能为我带来关于司法公正的深刻启示，让我对法官这个职业有一个全新的认识。
评分《Judges on Judging》这本书名，像一个磁石，牢牢吸引了我。作为一名对社会运作和规则制定有着浓厚兴趣的普通人，我总是对那些掌握着重要话语权的角色充满好奇，而法官无疑是其中最令人敬畏的一群。我经常在思考，是什么样的经历和训练，才能让一个人坐上审判席，并被赋予做出影响他人命运的权力？这本书，是否能够为我揭示法官选拔、培养以及他们在职业生涯中所面临的挑战？我希望了解，在每一次的判决背后，法官们是如何解读法律条文的，他们是否会参考先例，是否会考虑社会影响？更重要的是，我期待这本书能让我感受到法官们在行使职权时的责任感和使命感。我希望通过这本书，能够更深入地理解“依法治国”的真正含义，以及法官在其中扮演的关键角色。我想知道，他们是如何在维护法律尊严的同时，也体现出人性的温度。这本书，能否让我对法官这个职业，有一个更立体、更具象化的认知？
评分我对《Judges on Judging》这本书的期待，源于我对法律判决背后复杂思辨过程的向往。在我看来，法官并非仅仅是法律条文的复读机，而是社会公正的守护者和实现者。他们需要具备深厚的法律功底，更需要有敏锐的洞察力、严谨的逻辑思维以及对社会伦理的深刻理解。这本书，是否能够为我揭示法官们在审理案件时，是如何进行法律解释和价值判断的？我期待能够从中了解到，他们是如何在面对充满不确定性和争议的案件时，保持冷静和客观，并最终作出令人信服的判决。我尤其好奇，那些在司法实践中具有里程碑意义的判决，其背后法官们的思考过程是怎样的？他们是如何在法律的框架内，推动社会进步和价值实现的？我希望通过这本书，能够更深入地理解“司法公正”的本质，它不仅仅是对规则的遵守，更是一种对公平和正义的不懈追求。这本书，是否能让我感受到那些在审判席上深思熟虑的法官的智慧与风采？
评分一直以来，我都是一个热衷于探索司法领域的好奇宝宝，也因为这份好奇，我踏上了寻找一本能够深入剖析法官内心世界和审判实践的图书的旅程。《Judges on Judging》这个书名，就像一盏明灯，瞬间点燃了我对它无限的期待。我迫不及待地想要知道，那些身披法袍、手握权杖的审判者，在面对错综复杂的案件、形形色色的当事人时，究竟是如何思考的？他们的决策过程是否如我们想象般严谨公正，还是在人性的复杂与法律的条文之间，有着不为人知的挣扎与权衡？这本书，是否能为我们揭开那层神秘的面纱，让我们窥见法官们在庭审之外，那些不为外人道的思考、困惑、甚至灵感？我期待的，不仅仅是关于法律条文的解读，更是对司法精神、职业伦理以及法官个人信仰的深度挖掘。我希望这本书能够带领我穿越层层迷雾，去理解那些看似冰冷判决背后，所蕴含的复杂人性与价值取向。作为一名普通读者，我渴望的，是对司法公正的更深层次的理解，是对那些守护法律秩序的灵魂的致敬。这本书，能否成为我在这条探索之路上的最佳向导？我对此充满了无限的憧憬与好奇，并准备好全身心地沉浸其中，去聆听那些法官们内心深处的声音。
评分《Judges on Judging》这个书名，就像一道神秘的门扉，引领着我想要去探索那些隐藏在司法判决背后的声音。我一直对法律的运作和法官的角色充满好奇，尤其是在处理那些充满争议和社会关切的案件时。我常常在想，法官们在审视案件时，究竟是如何进行思考的？他们如何解读法律，如何权衡证据，如何平衡不同的利益诉求，并最终做出一个公正的判决？这本书，是否能够为我提供一个独特的视角，让我能够站在法官的角度，去理解他们所面临的挑战和压力？我渴望了解，那些在庭审中看似从容的法官，在私下里又是如何进行案件的研究和准备的。他们是否会对自己的判决进行反思，或者是否会从其他法官的判例中汲取经验？我希望通过阅读这本书，能够更深刻地理解“司法独立”的含义，以及法官在实践中是如何维护这一原则的。这本书，能否让我感受到法官们作为“裁判者”的智慧和担当？
评分《Judges on Judging》这本书，宛如一座未知的宝藏，激起了我内心深处探索的欲望。作为一个对法律体系运行充满好奇的普通读者，我一直对法官这个职业充满了敬意和疑问。在那些庄严的法庭上，他们扮演着维护正义的守护者角色，他们的每一个判决都可能对个人乃至社会产生深远的影响。我非常想知道，法官们在作出关键性判决时，他们的思考过程是怎样的？是基于对法律条文的死记硬背，还是包含着更深层次的对人性和社会的洞察？这本书，是否能够为我揭示法官们在司法实践中所面临的各种困境与挑战？我希望了解，他们是如何在处理复杂的案件时，保持客观公正，不受外界干扰。更重要的是，我期待这本书能够让我更深刻地理解“司法公正”的真正内涵，它不仅仅是程序上的合法，更是结果上的公平。我想知道，那些坐在审判席上的法官，他们是如何看待自己的职业使命，又是如何去践行这份神圣的职责的。这本书，能否成为我理解司法公正的最佳指南？
评分an excellent collection of essays by Supreme Court justices and federal district judges in the United States gives us an insight into how they approach their function as judges and the role of the judiciary in the American constitutional system.
评分an excellent collection of essays by Supreme Court justices and federal district judges in the United States gives us an insight into how they approach their function as judges and the role of the judiciary in the American constitutional system.
评分an excellent collection of essays by Supreme Court justices and federal district judges in the United States gives us an insight into how they approach their function as judges and the role of the judiciary in the American constitutional system.
评分an excellent collection of essays by Supreme Court justices and federal district judges in the United States gives us an insight into how they approach their function as judges and the role of the judiciary in the American constitutional system.
评分an excellent collection of essays by Supreme Court justices and federal district judges in the United States gives us an insight into how they approach their function as judges and the role of the judiciary in the American constitutional system.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有