"Moving Subjects" is the first of its kind to make a case not simply for the necessity of a spatial analysis of imperial formations, but for the indispensability of an investigative approach that links space and movement with the domain of the intimate. Through a combination of careful archival research and a commitment to excavating the variety of 'mobile intimacies' at the heart of imperial power, its agents, and its interlocutors, this volume offers new evidence and approaches for scholars engaged in capturing the historical nuances of imperial domination.The book's contributors investigate how intimacy was constructed across the restless world of empire, a world that depended on the circulation of capital and commodities, the exchange of systems of governance and surveillance, and the movement of labourers, slaves, soldiers, and settlers. Contributors are Tony Ballantyne, Antoinette Burton, Adrian Carton, David Haines, Katherine Ellinghaus, Charlotte Macdonald, Michael A. McDonnell, Kirsten McKenzie, Michelle Moran, Fiona Paisley, Adele Perry, Dana Rabin, Christine M. Skwiot, Rachel Standfield, Frances Steel, Elizabeth Vibert, and Kerry Wynn.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
Space and Empire，intimacy
评分Space and Empire，intimacy
评分這本論文集從Ann Stoler和Doreen Massey的兩套理論齣發，目的是為瞭擴充imperial history的definition和scholarship。不過，既然是討論intimacies across colonial/imperial space，為什麼連一篇關於地圖和其他視覺材料的論文都沒有啊（連插圖的地圖都沒有）？還有，為什麼Burton這一派的人總是繞著印度、非洲還有澳大利亞轉來轉去，死活不去討論亞洲啊（譬如香港）？蠻奇怪的。
评分這本論文集從Ann Stoler和Doreen Massey的兩套理論齣發，目的是為瞭擴充imperial history的definition和scholarship。不過，既然是討論intimacies across colonial/imperial space，為什麼連一篇關於地圖和其他視覺材料的論文都沒有啊（連插圖的地圖都沒有）？還有，為什麼Burton這一派的人總是繞著印度、非洲還有澳大利亞轉來轉去，死活不去討論亞洲啊（譬如香港）？蠻奇怪的。
评分Space and Empire，intimacy
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有