Personality Disorder is a baffling, confusing and rather bizarre condition. Although Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is a formal DSM-IV diagnosis, it is still very controversial, and many professionals claim that it is extremely rare, does not exist or is fictitious. There are many reasons why professionals may be reluctant to acknowledge DID: it is, indeed, baffling, confusing and bizarre. However, there are, perhaps, other reasons for the "low popularity" of this condition. DID, like Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), appears to be caused by trauma. But unlike PTSD, it appears to be caused by prolonged trauma, trauma which started in early childhood or infancy. Listening to accounts of people with DID is confusing due to the multiplicity of speaker(s)-it is also upsetting. The traumatic content of the stories is upsetting. The un-proved claims about terrible crimes are unsettling. We are faced with very difficult legal, ethical, moral and clinical questions, not knowing how to respond, what to believe, how to think.This book focuses on the most unsavory aspects of DID, namely, the forensic. It explores the role of crime in the lives of people with DID: crimes committed against them, by them and crimes that they have witnessed. The various papers reflect the experiences and thoughts of a range of professionals who have worked with this group: a GP, a psychiatrist, a police officer, a lawyer, psychotherapists and counselors and, most generously, a person who has DID.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部关于鉴识心理学的著作,其叙事结构实在令人叹为观止。作者似乎拥有一种罕见的洞察力,能够将看似松散的线索编织成一张严密而富有逻辑的网。从一开始的案例引入,就将读者带入了一个充满迷雾与悖论的司法现场。我尤其欣赏作者在处理复杂证据链时所展现出的那种近乎手术刀般精准的分析手法。他并非简单地堆砌术语,而是通过详尽的推理过程,逐步揭示隐藏在表象之下的真实动机与行为模式。书中的许多章节,特别是关于时间线重构和证人记忆偏差的讨论,都远超出了教科书式的陈述,更像是侦探小说中的精彩演绎,充满了对人性幽暗角落的深切探究。每一次翻页,都仿佛在进行一场智力上的角力,挑战着读者既有的认知框架。
评分坦白说,这本书展现出一种非常独特且令人信服的权威感,但这种权威感并非来自傲慢的断言,而是源于作者对每一个论点的扎实支撑。他似乎从不满足于主流观点的引用,而是热衷于对既有范式的质疑与重构。书中提出的若干方法论创新,特别是关于现场信息提取与解读的新模型,如果能够被广泛采纳,无疑会对当前的鉴识工作产生深远影响。这本书读完之后,留给读者的不只是知识的积累,更是一种思维方式的重塑,它训练了我们用更批判、更细致、更具前瞻性的眼光去审视那些被我们视为理所当然的“事实”。
评分阅读体验上,这本书的文字风格具有一种独特的韵律感,读起来酣畅淋漓,却又不失学术的严谨性。作者对细节的痴迷近乎偏执,从法医报告的格式到现场勘查的微小痕迹,无不被赋予了深刻的解读意义。我常常被那种抽丝剥茧的描述所吸引,仿佛亲身站在犯罪现场,呼吸着同样的空气,感受着那种紧张到极致的氛围。特别是关于某些特定类型犯罪现场重建的部分,作者采用了多重视角交叉验证的方法,使得原本模糊不清的事件轮廓变得清晰锐利。这种多维度、全景式的叙述方式,极大地提升了阅读的沉浸感,让人在不知不觉中,就完成了对复杂概念的吸收和内化,这在同类题材中是极为难得的。
评分作者在行文布局上的匠心独运,也值得大书特书。全书的章节过渡自然流畅,逻辑链条紧密衔接,几乎没有冗余的部分。他似乎深谙叙事节奏的掌控之道,总能在关键时刻设置悬念或提供豁然开朗的洞察。初读时,你可能会觉得信息量过大,但稍加深入,就会发现每一个看似随意的引述或数据点,最终都会在后续的章节中找到其存在的价值和意义,形成一个宏大的知识拼图。这种结构上的精妙处理,让厚重的专业内容变得易于消化,同时也极大地激发了读者的求知欲,让人忍不住想一口气读完,去追寻最终的真相。
评分这本书的理论深度和广度令人印象深刻,它不仅仅停留在技术层面,更深入探讨了司法实践中的伦理困境与哲学思辨。作者在论述鉴识科学的应用时,总是能巧妙地引入法律条文的边界和司法公正的本质追问。我特别赞赏其对“客观证据”与“主观解释”之间张力的探讨,这使得全书的讨论升华到了一个更高的层次。它迫使我思考,在冰冷的数据和证据背后,隐藏着怎样一套复杂的人类心理活动。对于那些期望从单纯技术指南中获得满足感的读者来说,这本书或许会带来一些“意外之喜”,因为它所提供的,是一种将科学、法律与人文学科融会贯通的全新视角。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有