This unique study offers a comprehensive analysis of American jurisprudence from its emergence in the later stages of the nineteenth century through to the present day. The author argues that it is a mistake to view American jurisprudence as a collection of movements and schools which have emerged in opposition to each other. By offering a highly original analysis of legal formalism, legal realism, policy science, process jurisprudence, law and economics, and critical legal studies, he demonstrates that American jurisprudence has evolved as a collection of themes which reflect broader American intellectual and cultural concerns.
评分
评分
评分
评分
追溯法律现实主义的起源,将之视为一种心态而非思潮。法律过程学派一章尤为突出,哈特与萨克斯,如何同现实主义前奏相连,又如何与德沃金理论相关。
评分追溯法律现实主义的起源,将之视为一种心态而非思潮。法律过程学派一章尤为突出,哈特与萨克斯,如何同现实主义前奏相连,又如何与德沃金理论相关。
评分追溯法律现实主义的起源,将之视为一种心态而非思潮。法律过程学派一章尤为突出,哈特与萨克斯,如何同现实主义前奏相连,又如何与德沃金理论相关。
评分追溯法律现实主义的起源,将之视为一种心态而非思潮。法律过程学派一章尤为突出,哈特与萨克斯,如何同现实主义前奏相连,又如何与德沃金理论相关。
评分追溯法律现实主义的起源,将之视为一种心态而非思潮。法律过程学派一章尤为突出,哈特与萨克斯,如何同现实主义前奏相连,又如何与德沃金理论相关。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有