He composed his first symphony at the age of 8. His middle name means "loved of God." And Austrian Emperor Joseph II accused his music of having "too many notes."
This course is a biographical and musical study of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791), who composed more than 600 works of beauty and brilliance in just over 20 years.
According to Professor Robert Greenberg, Mozart's music combined the pure lyricism of song with dramatic timing, depth of expression, and technical mastery of the complexities of phrase structure and harmony that allowed him to create a body of work unique in the repertoire.
Will the Real Wolfgang Please Stand Up?
And his personal life has generated nearly as much interest as his music. Who was Mozart? Was he the fair-haired boy-divinity of 19th-century Romanticism? Was he indeed the horse-laughing lout of recent theater and cinema? Was he borderline autistic or musical freak?
Was he an artistic traditionalist working happily within Haydn-defined Classicism? A social and musical rebel at war with a patronage system?
What did his contemporaries think of his music? Why was he so passionate about writing operas? How did he view his audience, his patrons, and his fellow composers? Does any of his music reflect his own moods or states of mind?
Who and what were the crucial influences in his life and his art? And how did he die?
You learn about Mozart's:
* Journey from youthful prodigy to posthumous deification
* Difficult relationship with his father
* Tours to London and Paris
* Struggles for a successful career
* Marriage to Constanze Weber
* Triumphs and disappointments in Vienna
* Relationships with Haydn, Emperor Joseph II, and librettist Lorenzo da Ponte.
"Much of today's Mozart scholarship is about debunking myths," says Professor Greenberg. "One of the reasons for the Mozart mythology is the fact that few responsible accounts of Mozart's life and personality were written during his lifetime. Much was written years after his death.
"Mozart's extraordinary, prodigious talent also fueled the notion that he was some kind of freak. At the heart of the Mozart mythology is the otherworldliness of his music. His middle name, Amadeus, 'loved of God,' also helped to imbue him with a God-like image.
"The goal of these lectures is to show Mozart to be a person: a talented, hard-working, ambitious man who had friends and enemies and whose music was subject to criticism in his own day."
Mozart's Early Life: Young Apprentice and a Domineering Father
The reality is that Mozart, like any other composer, served an apprenticeship. What is extraordinary is that Mozart's apprenticeship began at such a tender age; he wrote his first symphony at the age of 8 and was a mature composer by age 20, when most other composers are beginning their training.
He had an extraordinary memory and an ability to compose whole symphonies in his head. He worked extremely hard, frequently to the point of exhaustion—often at breakneck speed, amid squadrons of distractions, and without putting pen to paper until every last note of a new work had been composed in his head.
Mozart's early life was dominated by his father. Leopold Mozart counted on his children's musical talents to bring him the fame and fortune he could not earn for himself. The grand tour of 1763–1766 made the Mozart family the sensation of Europe and turned the small, fragile, desperate-to-please Wolfgang into an international celebrity and the family's main breadwinner.
Mozart learned his craft by absorbing the music of the best composers of his day: Johann Christian Bach (eleventh son of Johann Sebastian Bach) and the legendary Franz Joseph Haydn. By the time of Mozart's second visit to Paris in 1777 at age 21, his own original genius was emerging.
But that trip to Paris was also a disaster. His mother died there, he failed to find a position, he had no money, and his domineering father was interfering with his life to a degree he now found intolerable.
Settling in Vienna: A Soaring Genius
In 1781, Mozart settled in Vienna, an exciting place to live and work for artists at the time, thanks to the reforms of Emperor Joseph II. He married Constanze Weber against the wishes of his father; Leopold withheld Mozart's wedding dowry and later disinherited his son.
Mozart's genius soared. He reached the peak of his career in Vienna in 1782–1786. At this point, his piano concerti were his main source of income. Then, beginning in 1786, he collaborated with the great librettist Lorenzo Da Ponte on three of the repertoire's finest operas: The Marriage of Figaro, Don Giovanni, and Così fan tutte.
By the late 1780s, however, Mozart's popularity in Vienna was on the wane. His music had always had its critics—those who thought it too difficult, complex, or contrived.
"Mozart never attempted to compromise his musical integrity just to please the masses," notes Professor Greenberg. "Even his so-called 'entertainment' music is stamped with his inimitable and complex genius."
His politically controversial opera, The Marriage of Figaro, did not help further his career in Vienna. Masterpiece though it is, it deeply offended the Viennese aristocracy.
"Mozart was, in essence, biting the hand that fed him," says Professor Greenberg.
Mozart continued to pour out one masterwork after another, the expressive content rarely hinting at his unhappy circumstances.
The Final Years: The Magic Flute and a Requiem Mass
In 1790 Mozart's health began to deteriorate and he became depressed. That year, he wrote very little of significance. His creative recovery in early 1791 was inexplicable. The compositions of that year culminated in the great Masonic opera, The Magic Flute.
By the end of the year, he was working on a Requiem Mass, anonymously commissioned by a nobleman who liked to pass off others' compositions as his own. The Requiem remained unfinished at Mozart's death on December 5, 1791.
Myths and speculation surround the cause of Mozart's death. The most famous myth is that he was poisoned by the Italian composer Antonio Salieri who, while a patient in an insane asylum decades later, claimed that he had done the dastardly deed. The most likely theory is that Mozart died from acute rheumatic fever and a stroke brought on by excessive bloodletting—at the age of 35.
A Wide Selection of Excerpts from The Great Masters
Mozart wrote more than 600 compositions, whose standard numbering comes from the catalogue listing first published in 1862 by Ludwig von Köchel.
Works you'll hear in the lectures are excerpted from:
Eine kleine Nachtmusick, K. 525 (1787)
Don Giovanni, K. 527 (1787)
Piano Concerto no. 21 in C Major, K. 467 (1785)
String Quartet in C, K. 465 (Dissonant ) (1785)
The Magic Flute, K. 620 (1791)
Serenade in D Major, K. 320 (Posthorn) (1779)
Così fan tutte, K. 588 (1789)
Flute Concerto in D, K. 314/320d (1777)
Piano Concerto no. 18 in B-flat, K. 456 (1785)
Ein Musikalischer Spass, K. 522 (1787)
Sinfonia Concertante in E-flat for Violin, Viola, and Orchestra, K. 364/320d (1779)
The Marriage of Figaro, K. 492 (1786)
String Quintet in C Major, K. 515 (1787)
Symphony no. 40 in G Minor, K. 550 (1788)
Symphony no. 39 in E-flat Major, K. 543 (1788)
Symphony no. 41 in C Major, K. 551 (Jupiter ) (1788)
Requiem Mass, K. 626 (1791)
Robert Greenberg
San Francisco Performances
Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley
Robert Greenberg, Ph.D., is music historian-in-residence with San Francisco Performances. A graduate of Princeton University, Professor Greenberg holds a Ph.D. in Music Composition from the University of California, Berkeley, and has seen his compositions—which include more than 45 works for a wide variety of instrumental and vocal ensembles—performed all over the world, including New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Los Angeles, England, Ireland, Greece, Italy, and the Netherlands.
He has served on the faculties of the University of California at Berkeley, California State University at Hayward, and the San Francisco Conservatory of Music, and has lectured for some of the most prestigious musical and arts organizations in the United States, including the San Francisco Symphony, the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, the Van Cliburn Foundation, and the Chicago Symphony. For The Teaching Company, he has now recorded more than 500 lectures on a range of composers and classical music genres. His many honors include three Nicola de Lorenzo Composition Prizes and a Koussevitzky commission from the Library of Congress. He has been profiled in various major publications, including The Wall Street Journal; Inc. magazine; and the London Times.
评分
评分
评分
评分
翻开这本书时,我最先注意到的细节是其对“地域文化”与“音乐风格”之间关联性的探讨。很多传记往往聚焦于个体的天才性,从而忽略了他们成长的土壤。但这本书却花了大篇幅去分析特定城市环境,比如某个欧洲小邦国特有的政治气候或者市民阶层的审美趣味,是如何潜移默化地塑造了这位艺术家的早期作品基调。这种宏观背景的引入,极大地丰富了我对这位大师作品的理解维度。我开始明白,为什么某些作品会带着某种特有的地域色彩的忧郁或欢快,那并非偶然,而是历史河流中的必然产物。作者的论证逻辑非常清晰,他用扎实的史料来佐证自己的观点,从不进行空泛的臆测。这种将艺术置于广阔社会结构中的研究方法,极大地提升了这本书的学术价值,同时也让普通读者能够建立起一个更立体、更具空间感的历史认知框架。它不再是孤立的音乐事件,而是整个时代脉搏的一部分。
评分我必须承认,我是一个对音乐理论知之甚少的外行,所以很多深度探讨音乐结构的著作对我来说都是天书。这本书的厉害之处就在于,它成功地架起了一座桥梁,连接了纯粹的学术分析和我这样一个“门外汉”的理解鸿沟。作者似乎深谙如何用最平易近人的语言去解析那些看似高深莫测的创作技巧和和声进行,但这种“平易近人”绝不是肤浅的简化。相反,它通过一系列生动的类比和历史背景的嵌入,让那些复杂的音乐结构变得可感、可触摸。举个例子,书中描绘某部协奏曲的某一乐章时,那种对情感起伏的描述,比单纯听音乐时得到的感受要丰富得多,它像是在我的脑海中为旋律配上了具体的画面和情绪轨迹。我以前听音乐时总觉得缺少了点什么,读完后才明白,那缺失的部分恰恰是创作者彼时的心境和周遭环境的共振。这本书对“如何聆听”的指导,远超出了“你知道了什么”的范畴,它教会了你如何用心灵去捕捉那些隐藏在音符之间的秘密。
评分这本书的文风带着一种老派的、近乎散文诗的优雅,但又保持着极强的历史考据的严谨性,这两种看似矛盾的特质,在这本书里达成了奇妙的统一。我尤其欣赏作者在叙述中展现出的那种近乎“同理心”的视角。他并非高高在上地评判历史人物的功过,而是用一种近乎亲历者的口吻,去描摹那些天才们在创作巅峰时期的内心独白和外部干扰。书中对某一时期创作瓶颈的描述,那种“思如泉涌”到“万籁俱寂”的转换,写得太真实了。它让我意识到,即便是我们仰望的“大师”,他们也同样要面对灵感枯竭、自我怀疑、以及最现实的经济压力。这种对“人”的刻画,而非仅仅是“神话”的塑造,使得整本书充满了温度和厚度。我感觉自己不是在阅读一份报告,而是在听一位睿智的长者,慢条斯理地向你讲述那些光辉背后默默无闻的汗水和挣扎。这种细腻的情感铺陈,让阅读的过程变成了一种深入人心的对话。
评分这部书的装帧实在让人眼前一亮,封面那种古典的字体搭配着那种略带陈旧感的米黄色纸张,一拿在手里就仿佛穿越回了那个沙龙密布的时代。我原本是抱着随便翻翻的心态开始阅读的,毕竟关于古典音乐大师的作品市面上太多了,很难有能让人真正坐下来精读的。然而,这本书在叙事节奏的把握上展现出了一种令人惊叹的功力。它没有那种教科书式的僵硬,而是像一位经验丰富的导游,带着你缓缓走过那些被时间磨平的痕迹。作者对于那个特定历史时期社会风貌的描摹,简直是入木三分,让我得以窥见那些伟大灵魂在日常琐碎中挣扎与闪耀的真实侧面。比如,他对当时宫廷赞助制度下艺术家生存状态的细致刻画,那种微妙的权力平衡和艺术家的自尊心之间的拉扯,写得极其到位,让人读后久久不能忘怀。它似乎在告诉我,伟大并非凭空产生,而是无数次妥协、坚持、灵光乍现与世俗压力碰撞出的火花。这本书的排版也十分考究,留白恰到好处,阅读体验极佳,简直是收藏级的佳作,光是翻阅本身就是一种享受。
评分这本书的引人入胜之处,在于它构建了一套非常个人化的“解读体系”。它不像某些学术著作那样生怕得罪了谁,而是敢于提出一些具有挑战性的、但又基于深入研究的新颖观点。我尤其赞赏作者对于作品“未竟之作”的想象性重构。他没有简单地止步于“可惜”,而是基于对这位大师后期创作倾向的精准把握,大胆推测了如果这些作品完成,可能会达到的艺术高度和风格走向。当然,这部分内容带有明显的推测色彩,但作者的论据充分,使得这种“假设”读起来充满了说服力和吸引力。这种将历史研究与批判性想象力相结合的手法,让这本书的阅读体验充满了互动性和思辨性。它鼓励读者不仅仅是被动接受信息,而是要主动参与到对艺术意义的探寻之中。读完之后,我迫不及待地去重听了那些经典录音,带着书中提供的全新视角,每一个音符似乎都焕发出了新的光彩和更深的含义,仿佛打开了一个隐藏的宝库,让人流连忘返。
评分2010.3.10 FINISHED Simply bravo! Professor Greenberg offers a fair, passionate and endearing narrative of Mozart's life and music. For many times I could not hold back my tears. "Twice he said, Mozart..." What an amazing ending!
评分2010.3.10 FINISHED Simply bravo! Professor Greenberg offers a fair, passionate and endearing narrative of Mozart's life and music. For many times I could not hold back my tears. "Twice he said, Mozart..." What an amazing ending!
评分2010.3.10 FINISHED Simply bravo! Professor Greenberg offers a fair, passionate and endearing narrative of Mozart's life and music. For many times I could not hold back my tears. "Twice he said, Mozart..." What an amazing ending!
评分2010.3.10 FINISHED Simply bravo! Professor Greenberg offers a fair, passionate and endearing narrative of Mozart's life and music. For many times I could not hold back my tears. "Twice he said, Mozart..." What an amazing ending!
评分2010.3.10 FINISHED Simply bravo! Professor Greenberg offers a fair, passionate and endearing narrative of Mozart's life and music. For many times I could not hold back my tears. "Twice he said, Mozart..." What an amazing ending!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有