Village and Bureaucracy in Southern Sung China

Village and Bureaucracy in Southern Sung China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:University of Chicago Press
作者:Brian E. McKnight
出品人:
页数:230
译者:
出版时间:1983-2-15
价格:USD 32.00
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780226560601
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 社会史
  • 近世中国
  • 英文学术
  • Southern Song Dynasty
  • Village studies
  • Bureaucracy
  • Local history
  • Social history
  • Rural China
  • Political history
  • Chinese history
  • Sung Dynasty
  • Administrative history
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Title: The Unseen Thread: Local Governance and Elite Networks in the Late Tang Dynasty A Deep Dive into the Shifting Landscape of Governance and Society on the Eve of the Song Dynasty This volume undertakes an exhaustive examination of the administrative structures, social dynamics, and emerging gentry culture that defined the latter half of the Tang Dynasty, specifically focusing on the period leading up to the tumultuous collapse and subsequent establishment of the Song imperial order. Moving beyond grand narratives of dynastic decline and military upheaval, this study meticulously reconstructs the complex relationship between central authority, regional administrators, and the burgeoning local elites who were increasingly assuming de facto governance roles in the provinces. The core argument posits that the fiscal and administrative devolution initiated during the An Lushan Rebellion did not simply create power vacuums; rather, it catalyzed a profound restructuring of power rooted in local knowledge, kinship ties, and the strategic accumulation of landed wealth and scholarly capital. We move through a detailed cartography of mid-to-late Tang provincial administration, analyzing the practical execution—and frequent circumvention—of central decrees by magistrates whose tenures were often determined less by imperial mandate and more by their ability to broker peace, maintain tax quotas, and manage the powerful local lineage groups that controlled land and labor. Part I: The Architecture of Provincial Rule: Mandates, Mores, and Marginalization This section scrutinizes the formal mechanisms of Tang governance at the prefectural and county levels. It begins with a detailed analysis of the Zhi (records) compiled by regional officials, demonstrating how these documents, ostensibly tools for imperial oversight, often served as localized charters reflecting the specific environmental and social constraints faced by the officeholders. We explore the nuanced understanding of the Liangzhuang (taxation and corvée organization) and how the system evolved from standardized, state-managed rosters to hybrid models heavily reliant on local brokers—often members of the scholar-gentry class or powerful monastic estates—who mediated between the populace and the distant capital. Crucially, the study investigates the erosion of centralized bureaucratic control over personnel appointments. While the central government theoretically controlled appointments, the rise of powerful military governors (Jiedushi) and their subsequent fragmentation into semi-independent regional blocs forced local magistrates to navigate a treacherous political landscape. Through biographical sketches drawn from fragmented local gazetteers and private literary collections, we illustrate how an official’s success hinged on cultivating relationships not only with their immediate superior but also with powerful figures residing outside the formal administrative hierarchy—wealthy landholders who provided essential logistical support and local intelligence. Part II: Kinship, Capital, and Cultural Authority: The Rise of the Local Magnates The transition from a fluid, meritocratic ideal to a more entrenched, lineage-based social order is a central theme. This part focuses on the indigenous development of powerful regional families—the precursors to the fully formalized Song gentry. These families maintained their status not solely through official appointment but through the strategic intermarriage of administrative talent with economic power derived from large estates and control over essential infrastructure like irrigation works and salt production. We dedicate significant attention to the role of Shu (lineage academies) and ancestral halls. These institutions, often established and funded by wealthy local clans, served as centers for preserving classical learning, transmitting group identity, and, most importantly, maintaining detailed private land registers that often superseded or contradicted official county records. The tension between the state’s claim to ultimate ownership of land and the de facto control exercised by these established local networks forms a key axis of analysis. By examining surviving memorial inscriptions and funerary texts, we uncover the subtle ways in which local elites projected their authority, linking their fortunes to auspicious geography and verifiable lineage depth, thereby legitimizing their control over local populations. Part III: The Fluidity of Faith and Finance: Monastic Estates and Informal Economies The interaction between formal administration and informal economic actors is explored in depth. Buddhist and Daoist monastic complexes, possessing vast tracts of tax-exempt land and serving as crucial repositories of wealth and repositories of social capital (offering credit, refuge, and education), complicated the state's fiscal planning. This section analyzes official attempts—often sporadic and largely ineffective—to regulate monastic wealth. We uncover documented instances where local officials, either through direct collusion or necessity, effectively outsourced aspects of local welfare and tax collection to temple networks. Furthermore, the volume examines the development of local credit systems and mutual aid societies (like the she organizations), often operating under the patronage of powerful families or temples. These informal financial instruments provided the necessary liquidity for local economies that the official state banking mechanisms struggled to reach, binding local populations more closely to these non-state patrons than to the distant imperial court. Conclusion: Seeds of the Next Order The Unseen Thread concludes by arguing that the administrative pragmatism, the localized reliance on lineage networks, and the intricate balance of power between appointed officials and landed magnates established during the late Tang were not merely symptoms of decline. Instead, they were the essential, if often messy, foundations upon which the subsequent Song dynasty built its successful reconstruction of imperial authority. The Song emperors inherited a system where local power was diffuse yet entrenched; their success lay in devising new strategies to co-opt, rather than completely dismantle, these existing local structures of governance and loyalty. This study illuminates the critical, often overlooked, social and economic landscape that made the eventual political rebirth of the Song possible. The book draws extensively upon newly digitized fragments of local histories, detailed commentaries on early administrative codes, and literary sources that reveal the everyday interactions between officials and the governed, offering a textured, ground-up perspective rarely afforded in traditional histories focused solely on the capital.

作者简介

目录信息

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

当我看到《乡村与官僚体系:南宋中国》这本书名时,脑海中立即浮现出一种“自上而下”与“自下而上”的动态张力。一方面,南宋王朝作为一个高度中央集权的政权,其官僚体系无疑是庞大且富有影响力的,它制定政策,征收税赋,维护秩序。另一方面,广袤的中国乡村,则拥有着自己根深蒂固的社会结构、经济模式和文化传统。 我非常好奇,在这本书中,作者是如何描绘这两种力量交织在一起的?是官僚体系完全主导了乡村的命运,还是乡村社会也反过来塑造了官僚体系的运作方式?例如,在征税或征兵的过程中,乡村社区可能会采取怎样的策略来应对官方的要求?官僚机构又是如何在这种互动中调整其政策和执行方式的?我期望这本书能够提供一些生动的细节,让我们看到,在那个遥远的时代,国家权力与乡村社会之间并非简单的单向灌输,而是一种复杂而充满博弈的共存关系。

评分

读到《乡村与官僚体系:南宋中国》的摘要,我 immediately 被一种历史研究的“新视角”所吸引。通常我们谈论南宋,总是聚焦于其繁荣的商业、精致的文化,或是与金、元的军事对抗。而这本书似乎把目光投向了更为基础、更为普遍的社会层面——乡村的日常,以及与之交织的官僚权力。我脑海中浮现出许多问题:当时的官僚机构,其渗透力和影响力到底有多深?它们是如何在地方层面运作,如何与当地的社会结构、经济活动发生碰撞的? 我尤其感兴趣的是,在那个时代,地方精英,比如士绅、族长,他们在官僚体系和乡村社会之间的角色扮演。他们是如何在维护自身利益的同时,扮演连接国家与乡村的桥当的?他们是官僚体系的代理人,还是乡村社会的代言人?亦或是两者皆有?这本书会不会通过对这些人物的个案研究,或是对某个特定区域的深入考察,来揭示出官僚体系在地方治理中的复杂性和多重性?我期待看到的是一种 nuanced 的分析,而非简单化的二元对立,能够展现出不同社会阶层、不同权力主体之间的博弈与互动。

评分

啊,拿到这本《乡村与官僚体系:南宋中国》,第一感觉就是书名本身就勾勒出了一幅相当具象的图景。我想象着,在那个遥远的南宋时代,一个宁静的乡村,炊烟袅袅,稻香阵阵,生活节奏仿佛慢悠悠地流动着。然而,这幅田园牧歌般的画面背后,却潜藏着与国家机器紧密相连的另一面——官僚体系。这本书似乎就是要深入剖析这两者之间错综复杂的关系,它不是简单地将乡村视为一个自给自足的封闭单元,也不是孤立地描绘官僚机构的运作,而是将两者置于一个动态的互动框架中。 我好奇的是,作者是如何捕捉到这种“连接”的?比如,那些来自朝廷的法令、税收、征兵,又是如何层层传递,最终影响到南宋江南地区那些具体的村落的?是直接的行政命令,还是通过地方士绅、乡约等中间环节?我尤其想知道,官僚体系的介入,究竟给乡村带来了哪些改变?是带来了秩序和便利,还是压迫和剥削?书中会不会有一些具体的案例,让我们得以窥见这种权力关系的微观运作?是关于一个村庄如何应对一次摊派,还是一个地方官员如何处理一次土地纠纷?我期待着作者能用生动的笔触,描绘出那个时代乡村生活的真实肌理,同时又不失宏观的社会分析。

评分

《乡村与官僚体系:南宋中国》这本书的标题,瞬间点燃了我对历史研究中一个长期被忽视的领域的兴趣。通常,学术界对于王朝的宏大叙事,如政治制度、军事冲突、经济改革等,有着大量的关注,而对于国家机器如何深入到最基层社会,如何与分散的乡村社群发生互动,则相对研究较少。这本著作恰恰填补了这一空白,它试图描绘南宋时期,一个强大的官僚体系是如何与广大而多样化的乡村社会发生深刻联系的。 我脑海中浮现出各种各样的问题:在那个时代的中国,官僚体系的触角到底有多长?它又是如何通过不同层级的官员,将国家意志渗透到最偏远的村落?书中会不会具体探讨,在乡村治理的实际运作中,官僚机构与当地的传统习俗、宗族势力之间,是合作还是对抗?是互相扶持,还是彼此制约?我期待这本书能够提供一些具体的案例,展示出官僚体系在乡村经济活动、社会秩序、甚至人们的日常生活中的具体影响,从而让我们更全面地理解南宋社会结构的复杂性。

评分

拿起《乡村与官僚体系:南宋中国》这本书,我仿佛穿越了时空,置身于那个遥远的南宋。书名本身就引发了我对那个时代社会结构的强烈好奇。在许多人的印象中,南宋是一个经济发达、文化昌盛的王朝,但经济的繁荣和文化的辉煌,离不开一个有效的社会管理体系。而“官僚体系”这个词,则直接指向了支撑这个王朝运作的庞大行政网络。 我特别想了解的是,这个官僚体系是如何在最基层的乡村社会施加影响的。是简单的税收征管,还是更深入的社会控制?书中会不会涉及一些具体的政策,例如土地制度、徭役制度,或是司法管辖权,是如何在乡村落地,并对农民的生活产生直接或间接的影响?我脑海中勾勒出这样一幅画面:官府的文书,带着墨香,在乡野间传递,影响着农民的耕作、他们的家庭,甚至他们的命运。这本书或许能为我揭示出,在那看似平静的乡村表面之下,隐藏着怎样的权力运行逻辑和治理机制。

评分

翻阅,早年作品,还带有很重的“这种东西在我们西方就相当于什么”的色彩,以及将南宋单列出来考虑而少谈前后承接,但也已意识到逐渐有自我意识的地方精英群体对国家权力的柔性抵抗

评分

翻阅,早年作品,还带有很重的“这种东西在我们西方就相当于什么”的色彩,以及将南宋单列出来考虑而少谈前后承接,但也已意识到逐渐有自我意识的地方精英群体对国家权力的柔性抵抗

评分

翻阅,早年作品,还带有很重的“这种东西在我们西方就相当于什么”的色彩,以及将南宋单列出来考虑而少谈前后承接,但也已意识到逐渐有自我意识的地方精英群体对国家权力的柔性抵抗

评分

翻阅,早年作品,还带有很重的“这种东西在我们西方就相当于什么”的色彩,以及将南宋单列出来考虑而少谈前后承接,但也已意识到逐渐有自我意识的地方精英群体对国家权力的柔性抵抗

评分

翻阅,早年作品,还带有很重的“这种东西在我们西方就相当于什么”的色彩,以及将南宋单列出来考虑而少谈前后承接,但也已意识到逐渐有自我意识的地方精英群体对国家权力的柔性抵抗

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有