From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by Leonard Downie Jr. Harold Evans, a Manchester-born British newspaper editor who became an American citizen in 1993, is not as well known as he should be in his adopted country. He has written two best-selling books about American history, published a record number of bestsellers by other authors as president of Random House, started Conde Nast Traveler magazine and served as editorial director of U.S. News & World Report. In Britain, however, before he moved to the United States in 1983, Harold Evans was nationally known as the most influential newspaper editor of his time. As the crusading editor of the Sunday Times from 1967 to 1981, he championed investigative journalism that, among other accomplishments, achieved justice for the deformed child victims of the drug thalidomide and exposed the treason of Soviet spy Kim Philby. He repeatedly and successfully challenged heavy-handed British government secrecy and censorship, significantly increasing freedom of the press in a country without a First Amendment. He mentored countless prominent British journalists and filled bookstores with their Sunday Times books. He was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II in 2004. Evans's memoir, aided by prescient personal diaries, is a victory lap, recounting in detail his remarkable climb from teenage cub reporter, raised in a working-class family in England's Midlands, to the top of British journalism, without the usually requisite Oxbridge pedigree. Although his engaging, conversational narrative is sprinkled with wry self-deprecation and generous credit for many people he worked with over the years, its hero is clearly the first-person narrator, to a sometimes cloying degree. At one point, Evans describes his editorship of the Sunday Times as "my power base as a defender of press freedom." As its subtitle implies, his memoir also is an excursion into nostalgia for the pre-computer days of swashbuckling, competitive British newspaper journalism with metal type, multiple editions, crowded newsrooms, constant deadlines, gruff editors, reputation-making scoops, groundbreaking investigative reporting and tense conflicts with unions and the government. Some of the dense detail is too peculiar to British life and newspapering, even for the journalists among American readers. But the story picks up when Evans narrates campaigns he directed as an editor, first at the provincial Northern Star and then at the London-based Sunday Times. His campaigns combined aggressive reporting, editorializing and even lobbying to right wrongs. They included a drive at the Northern Star to exonerate a man who had been wrongly executed for murder and the Sunday Times crusade to win financial compensation for children born with foreshortened or no limbs after their mothers had taken thalidomide for morning sickness between 1958 and 1962. The latter effort included one of Evans's many confrontations with criminal contempt and official secrecy laws that had restricted reporting in Britain. Evans's campaigns and his creation of the pioneering Sunday Times's investigative team paralleled the expansion of investigative reporting in the United States, following the U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing publication of the Pentagon Papers and The Washington Post's Watergate reporting. But there was a difference that Evans does not really address. Most American newspapers keep their news reporting, including investigative reporting, separate from their editorial opinions -- and their editors do not personally lobby for reform of problems revealed by their reporting. Evans does make clear his pride in his campaigns, the hallmark of his career. And he lists rules for them. "The paper had to have investigated the subject thoroughly enough to be sure that there was a genuine grievance, it had to have defined a practical remedy, it had to be ready to commit the resources for a sustained effort, and had to open its columns to counterarguments and corrections of fact," he writes. "No campaign should be ended until it had succeeded -- or was proven wrong." When Rupert Murdoch bought the daily and Sunday Times newspapers, he persuaded Evans to become editor of the daily Times in 1981, only to force him out a year later, apparently because Evans was too independent of his control. That, and Evans's divorce from his first wife and marriage to a much younger British journalist, Tina Brown, were eventually followed by the couple's move to America. "If he hadn't given me a shove," Evans writes about his showdown with Murdoch, "I wouldn't have enjoyed twenty-five exuberant years exploring new frontiers." In addition to Evans's busy second act in American magazine and book publishing, Tina Brown has been editor, in succession, of Vanity Fair, the New Yorker and Talk magazines, and founder of the Daily Beast Web site. They have lived in a two-story apartment on New York's Upper East Side and a beach house in Westhampton, an area that reminds Evans of the English seaside. Yet he races through their quarter-century in America at the tail end of a book that dwells on his life in Britain working at newspapers. In this readable, almost wistful memoir, Sir Harold Evans remains the rare self-made Englishman who changed British journalism. downiel@washpost.com
Copyright 2009, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.
评分
评分
评分
评分
《My Paper Chase: True Stories of Vanished Times》这个书名,给我一种复古的、充满人文关怀的基调。我总觉得,每一个时代都有它独特的韵味和温度,而随着时间的推移,这些宝贵的东西很容易被遗忘或者被现代化的洪流所淹没。我喜欢那些能够挖掘出这些“消失的时光”的作品,它们就像是给我们的记忆注入了新鲜的血液,让我们能够更深刻地理解过去,也更能珍惜现在。我猜想,这本书里收录的故事,可能不是宏大的历史事件,而是那些发生在普通人身上的、却极具时代烙印的生活片段。也许是关于一封跨越战火的家书,也许是关于一个在旧时代默默坚守的行业,又或者是关于一个消失的社区,承载着几代人的喜怒哀乐。我渴望通过这些“真实的记录”,去感受那个时代的脉搏,去体会那些曾经鲜活过的心灵,去理解那些构成我们社会肌理的细微之处。这本书对我而言,更像是一次温情的对话,与那些已经远去的生命,与那些被岁月尘封的记忆,进行一场跨越时空的交流。
评分从这本书的书名来看,《My Paper Chase: True Stories of Vanished Times》,我联想到的是一种寻觅的艰辛与发现的喜悦。这不禁让我想起自己曾经有过类似的经历,比如在整理祖母遗物时,偶然发现了一本她年轻时写的日记,里面记录了那个年代的生活细节,那些我从未想象过的日常琐事,还有她年轻时的梦想与烦恼,那种感觉就像是突然打开了一个全新的世界,充满了陌生又亲切的惊喜。我希望这本书也能带给我类似的触动。我猜想,作者可能花费了大量的时间和精力,去搜集那些零散的、被忽视的“纸张”——或许是泛黄的信件、旧报纸的剪报、甚至是街角杂货店的账单。每一个看似微不足道的物件,都可能串联起一段动人的故事,揭示出一段被遗忘的历史。我期待作者的“纸上寻踪”能够像侦探破案一样,环环相扣,层层深入,最终呈现出一个完整而感人的“消失的时光”。这不仅仅是对过去的追溯,更是对生命痕迹的珍视和对时间流逝的深刻反思,我期待在阅读过程中,能够体会到这种探索的乐趣和历史的厚重。
评分这本书的书名《My Paper Chase: True Stories of Vanished Times》让我立刻联想到的是一种带有神秘色彩的探险,仿佛要跟随作者一同踏上一段寻找失落宝藏的旅程。然而,这里的“宝藏”并非金银财宝,而是那些已经消逝的时间和与之相关的真实故事。我对此感到非常兴奋,因为我一直以来都对那些被历史长河冲刷掉的细节和碎片充满了浓厚的兴趣。我喜欢那些能够将过去的人、事、物重新鲜活起来的作品,它们能够让我们从不同的角度去审视历史,去感受那些曾经存在过的生活方式和情感。我期待作者能够在书中展现出其独特的搜寻能力,也许是穿梭于古老的档案库,也许是采访那些年长的亲历者,又或者是从一些不起眼的旧物件中挖掘出惊人的线索。我希望这些“真实的记录”能够带领我进入一个又一个鲜活的、充满个性的“消失的时光”,去体验那些时代的独特魅力,去理解那些塑造了我们今天的过往。
评分“Paper Chase”这个词组,让我第一时间联想到的是一种执着而充满韧性的追寻,而“Vanished Times”则唤起了我对过去那个时代强烈的浪漫主义情怀。这本书的书名《My Paper Chase: True Stories of Vanished Times》仿佛在许诺着一场穿越时空的冒险,一次对那些被遗忘的印记的深度挖掘。我一直对那些在时间长河中逐渐模糊的细节和人物故事抱有浓厚的兴趣,总觉得它们比宏大的历史叙事更能触及人心。我猜想,作者在这本书中,可能并不是在讲述那些被载入史册的伟人或重大事件,而是将目光投向了那些被遗忘的角落,那些在时代变迁中悄然消逝的生活方式、情感纠葛、甚至是平凡人的梦想与挣扎。我期待书中能够出现一些令人意想不到的发现,一些从泛黄的纸张中跃然而出的鲜活生命,他们的故事或许微不足道,却足以触动我们内心深处最柔软的部分,让我们重新审视时间和生命本身的意义。
评分这本书的封面上印着一个褪色的老式旅行箱,上面还盖着几张泛黄的明信片,瞬间就勾起了我对旧时光的无限遐想。我一直以来都对那些被遗忘的历史片段、那些尘封在记忆深处的过往充满了好奇,而这本书的标题《My Paper Chase: True Stories of Vanished Times》恰恰点燃了我内心深处的那个探索欲。我迫不及待地想知道,作者是如何展开这场“纸上寻踪”的旅程的,他/她又会带我穿越到哪些已经消逝的年代。我脑海中浮现出许多画面:或许是翻阅家族老照片时发现的惊人秘密,或许是深入某个被遗忘的村庄,倾听当地老人讲述那些早已被主流历史抹去的往事,又或者是偶然发现了一封尘封多年的情书,里面记录着一段缠绵悱 the 的故事。我非常期待作者能够用生动细腻的笔触,将那些“消失的时光”以一种近乎触摸得到的方式呈现在我眼前,让我仿佛亲身经历那个时代,感受那些曾经鲜活的生命和他们的故事。这本书对我来说,不仅仅是一本书,更像是一扇通往过去的大门,我渴望踏入其中,去感受那些被岁月冲刷却依旧闪耀的真实。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有