For at least two decades the career of Edward Said has defined what it means to be a public intellectual today. Although attacked as a terrorist and derided as a fraud for his work on behalf of his fellow Palestinians, Said's importance extends far beyond his political activism. In this volume a distinguished group of scholars assesses nearly every aspect of Said's work - his contributions to postcolonial theory, his work on racism and ethnicity, his aesthetics and his resistance to the aestheticization of politics, his concepts of figuration, his assessment of the role of the exile in a metropolitan culture, and his work on music and the visual arts. In two separate interviews, Said himself comments on a variety of topics, among them the response of the American Jewish community to his political efforts in the Middle East.Yet even as the Palestinian struggle finds a central place in his work, it is essential - as the contributors demonstrate - to see that this struggle rests on and gives power to his general 'critique of colonisers' and is not simply the outgrowth of a local nationalism. Perhaps more than any other person in the United States, Said has changed how the U.S. media and American intellectuals must think about and represent Palestinians, Islam, and the Middle East. Most importantly, this change arises not as a result of political action but out of a potent humanism - a breadth of knowledge and insight that has nourished many fields of inquiry.Originally a special issue of boundary 2, the book includes new articles on minority culture and on orientalism in music, as well as an interview with Said by Jacqueline Rose. Supporting the claim that the last third of the twentieth century can be called the 'Age of Said', this collection will enlighten and engage students in virtually any field of humanistic study. Contributors of this title are: Jonathan Arac, Paul A. Bove, Terry Cochran, Barbara Harlow, Kojin Karatani, Rashid I. Khalidi, Sabu Kohsu, Ralph Locke, Mustapha Marrouchi, Jim Merod, W. J. T. Mitchell, Aamir R. Mufti, Jacqueline Rose, Edward W. Said, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Lindsay Waters.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的语言运用,充满了克制而又精准的学术美感。它避免了过度煽情的辞藻,却在每一个关键的转折点上,用极具分量的词汇来锚定论点的重量。对于我这种追求阅读效率的读者来说,一开始确实需要适应这种相对“慢热”的节奏,但一旦进入状态,便会感受到一种不同寻常的智力上的满足感。我尤其欣赏作者对“权力与知识”这一永恒主题的阐述方式,它不落窠臼地将两者进行二元对立,而是描绘了一种渗透与共生的复杂关系。书中的某些段落,其密度之高,需要反复阅读才能捕捉到全部的细微差别,这让我深刻体会到,真正深刻的思想交流,往往需要双方投入同等的专注度。这本书更像是一次与一位深思熟虑的智者的私密对话,充满了挑战和启发。
评分这本书的行文风格,初读时可能会让人感到有些晦涩,它不像那些通俗读物那样追求一目了然的爽快感,反而更像是在进行一场精密的智力体操。作者似乎深谙“间接性”的力量,很多观点并非直截了当地抛出来,而是通过对大量一手资料的梳理、对历史背景的细致还原,让结论如同自然生长般浮现。我发现自己不得不频繁地查阅注释,这在某种程度上打断了阅读的流畅性,但也正是这种“被迫的停顿”,让我有机会更深入地思考作者构建的论证链条。它有一种内在的张力,一方面是学术的严谨性要求,另一方面是面对复杂议题时,那种难以言喻的伦理困境。我尤其欣赏其中对“批判”二字的解构,作者似乎在努力剥离这个词汇被过度简化和标签化的外衣,将其还原为一个持续的、充满自我审视的过程。读完一部分后,我需要放下书本,在脑海中反复构建那些错综复杂的思想节点,这是一种挑战,也是一种独特的阅读乐趣。
评分这本书的封面设计着实吸引眼球,那种带着年代感的排版,配上略显斑驳的字体,仿佛能让人一下子穿越回那个知识分子群体思想激荡的年代。我拿起它的时候,心里其实是抱着一种探寻和敬畏的态度的。说实话,我对那位理论大家早期的思想脉络了解得并不算深入,更多是停留在一些宏观的、被引用的片段中。这本书的出现,对我来说就像是一张详细的路线图,试图梳理出一条清晰的学术演进的路径。它不仅仅是关于某一个具体文本的解读,更像是在描绘一种知识生产的环境,那种被时代洪流裹挟着,却又力图保持清醒和批判性的知识分子的生存状态。翻阅过程中,我特别留意了作者是如何处理那些敏感的、容易引起争议的论断的,那种小心翼翼却又坚守立场的笔法,着实考验着作者的功力。整体而言,它给人一种沉甸甸的感觉,不是那种轻飘飘的流行读物,而是需要静下心来,细细咀嚼才能体会出其中滋味的深度文本。
评分从一个普通读者的角度出发,这本书无疑具有相当高的学术价值,但更令我印象深刻的是它所蕴含的那种“知识分子的责任感”。阅读过程中,我能清晰地感受到作者对于学术纯洁性与社会介入性之间平衡的执着追求。他似乎在不断追问:批判的界限在哪里?知识分子在不义面前应扮演何种角色?这些宏大叙事下的个体挣扎和理论构建,都被细腻地呈现在读者面前。这本书没有提供廉价的答案或快速的解决方案,它提供的,是更深刻的问题和更坚实的思考工具。它让我对“做一名有良知的阅读者”这个身份有了更深一层的理解,意识到阅读本身也可以是一种抵抗和建构性的行为。总而言之,这是一本值得反复翻阅的案头书,每一次重读,都会带来新的领悟和反思。
评分我注意到这本书在结构上的精心编排,它不是简单的时间线梳理,更像是一个螺旋上升的知识结构图。每一个章节的衔接都充满了逻辑上的必然性,仿佛作者事先已经预设了读者会带着哪些疑问进入下一阶段的论述。这种结构感使得即便是面对一些非常专业的理论探讨,读者的心绪也不会完全迷失方向。更让我感到惊喜的是,作者在处理那些经典文本的引用时,展现出的那种“重新激活”的能力。他没有满足于简单地复述前人的见解,而是试图在当代语境下,重新审视那些被时间尘封的论断,挖掘它们新的生命力和潜在的批判能量。这就像是给一台老旧的精密仪器进行了一次彻底的维护和校准,让它重新焕发出应有的光芒。这本书,在我看来,与其说是在介绍一位学者的思想,不如说是在演示一种高水平的学术研究方法论,它教人如何提问,如何拆解,如何在宏大叙事中寻找个体的声音。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有