There is no consensus about what someone who has violated society's rules must do in order to be fully restored to the community. Although repentance is a prominent idea in religions ranging from Judaism, Christianity, and Islam to Buddhism and Hinduism, its use in civic culture is vague and inconsistent. For example, is remorse the same as repentance? Drawing from a variety of religious and civic perspectives, the renowned contributors to this book_from the fields of theology, philosophy, and the social sciences_offer a broad understanding of repentance and its many applications. The essays question the legitimacy of repentance as a religious concept for the civic culture, exploring the way in which the religious origins of repentance might both illuminate and facilitate our civic usage of the idea. Excellent for theologians, philosophers, moral ethicists, and anyone asking, ' Who deserves a second chance?'
只有intro部分还有点想法。挑着几篇看了,都挺水的。印度教的那篇跟1964年de smet写的比,也没什么进步,唯一就是不再提耶稣基督了,呵呵。佛教那片就更忽悠了。Harvey Cox也完全就是忽悠。感觉基督教的文章们都不屌东方宗教,东方宗教的那些时常不冷不热地跟人家拉拉关系,唉...
評分只有intro部分还有点想法。挑着几篇看了,都挺水的。印度教的那篇跟1964年de smet写的比,也没什么进步,唯一就是不再提耶稣基督了,呵呵。佛教那片就更忽悠了。Harvey Cox也完全就是忽悠。感觉基督教的文章们都不屌东方宗教,东方宗教的那些时常不冷不热地跟人家拉拉关系,唉...
評分只有intro部分还有点想法。挑着几篇看了,都挺水的。印度教的那篇跟1964年de smet写的比,也没什么进步,唯一就是不再提耶稣基督了,呵呵。佛教那片就更忽悠了。Harvey Cox也完全就是忽悠。感觉基督教的文章们都不屌东方宗教,东方宗教的那些时常不冷不热地跟人家拉拉关系,唉...
評分只有intro部分还有点想法。挑着几篇看了,都挺水的。印度教的那篇跟1964年de smet写的比,也没什么进步,唯一就是不再提耶稣基督了,呵呵。佛教那片就更忽悠了。Harvey Cox也完全就是忽悠。感觉基督教的文章们都不屌东方宗教,东方宗教的那些时常不冷不热地跟人家拉拉关系,唉...
評分只有intro部分还有点想法。挑着几篇看了,都挺水的。印度教的那篇跟1964年de smet写的比,也没什么进步,唯一就是不再提耶稣基督了,呵呵。佛教那片就更忽悠了。Harvey Cox也完全就是忽悠。感觉基督教的文章们都不屌东方宗教,东方宗教的那些时常不冷不热地跟人家拉拉关系,唉...
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有