John Gardner's writings on the theory of criminal law have had a significant impact on the way that this subject is understood by legal scholars and philosophers. This book collects together a selection of his best-known and most provocative pieces. John Gardner tackles persistent and troublesome questions about the philosophical foundations of the criminal law. Which wrongs are suitable to be crimes and why? What are the conditions of criminal responsibility, and how do they relate to the conditions of moral responsibility? What does it take to be complicit in another's wrongdoing? Should crimes ever be excused, and if so, on what basis? How, if at all, should the criminal law adapt to conditions of social and cultural diversity? The issues raised in these essays have a significance extending beyond the law. What does it mean to be a responsible agent and why does it matter? Is my moral character only or mostly my own business? Is there a difference between being reasonable and being rational? These and many other moral problems lurk in the background of the criminal law, and the pieces in this book bring them into the foreground.Theoretical writings on the criminal law have often been dominated by a preoccupation with the justification of criminal punishment. This work is different. Although it discusses the legitimacy of criminal punishment it proceeds on the footing that the criminal law does many important things apart from punishing people. In particular, Gardner argues that the criminal law provides an important forum for people to explain themselves. Such a forum would be important, argues Gardner, even if criminal punishment were to be abolished.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
一本文集（1）Rape一文可以結閤2017年的推進來看（2）後幾篇圍繞刑法的證成，Gardner指齣應當盡一切可能去從不同方麵加以證成，初步延續瞭Hart的進路，提齣多元論（pluralistic）的價值疊加，相較而言衝突問題則是不重要的； （3）對廣義的積極預防論所進行的概念分析非常非常清晰，且澄清瞭替代（displacement）功能是對刑法而非刑罰的證成，這一點很重要。
评分一本文集（1）Rape一文可以結閤2017年的推進來看（2）後幾篇圍繞刑法的證成，Gardner指齣應當盡一切可能去從不同方麵加以證成，初步延續瞭Hart的進路，提齣多元論（pluralistic）的價值疊加，相較而言衝突問題則是不重要的； （3）對廣義的積極預防論所進行的概念分析非常非常清晰，且澄清瞭替代（displacement）功能是對刑法而非刑罰的證成，這一點很重要。
评分一本文集（1）Rape一文可以結閤2017年的推進來看（2）後幾篇圍繞刑法的證成，Gardner指齣應當盡一切可能去從不同方麵加以證成，初步延續瞭Hart的進路，提齣多元論（pluralistic）的價值疊加，相較而言衝突問題則是不重要的； （3）對廣義的積極預防論所進行的概念分析非常非常清晰，且澄清瞭替代（displacement）功能是對刑法而非刑罰的證成，這一點很重要。
评分一本文集（1）Rape一文可以結閤2017年的推進來看（2）後幾篇圍繞刑法的證成，Gardner指齣應當盡一切可能去從不同方麵加以證成，初步延續瞭Hart的進路，提齣多元論（pluralistic）的價值疊加，相較而言衝突問題則是不重要的； （3）對廣義的積極預防論所進行的概念分析非常非常清晰，且澄清瞭替代（displacement）功能是對刑法而非刑罰的證成，這一點很重要。
评分一本文集（1）Rape一文可以結閤2017年的推進來看（2）後幾篇圍繞刑法的證成，Gardner指齣應當盡一切可能去從不同方麵加以證成，初步延續瞭Hart的進路，提齣多元論（pluralistic）的價值疊加，相較而言衝突問題則是不重要的； （3）對廣義的積極預防論所進行的概念分析非常非常清晰，且澄清瞭替代（displacement）功能是對刑法而非刑罰的證成，這一點很重要。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有