Human reason is limited. Given the scarcity of reason, how should the power to make constitutional law be allocated among legislatures, courts and the executive, and how should legal institutions be designed? In Law and the Limits of Reason, Adrian Vermeule denies the widespread view, stemming from Burke and Hayek, that the limits of reason counsel in favor of judges making "living" constitutional law in the style of the common law. Instead, he proposes and defends a "codified constitution" - a regime in which legislatures have the primary authority to develop constitutional law over time, through statutes and constitutional amendments. Vermeule contends that precisely because of the limits of human reason, large modern legislatures, with their numerous and highly diverse memberships and their complex internal structures for processing information, are the most epistemically effective lawmaking institutions.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
have a layman as justice to balance lawyer's professional bias in the court is an interesting proposal
评分have a layman as justice to balance lawyer's professional bias in the court is an interesting proposal
评分have a layman as justice to balance lawyer's professional bias in the court is an interesting proposal
评分have a layman as justice to balance lawyer's professional bias in the court is an interesting proposal
评分have a layman as justice to balance lawyer's professional bias in the court is an interesting proposal
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有