The Phillips ROI MethodologyT utilizes five levels of evaluation, which are essential in determining the return on investment.
At Level 1 - Reaction and Planned Action, attendee and stakeholder satisfaction from the meeting can be measured. Almost all organizations evaluate at Level 1, usually with a generic, end-of-meeting questionnaire. While this level of evaluation is important as a "stakeholder" satisfaction measure, a favorable reaction does not ensure that attendees have acquired new skills, knowledge, opinions or attitudes from the meeting.
At Level 2 - Learning, measurements focus on what participants learned during the meeting using tests, skill practices, role-plays, simulations, group evaluations, and other assessment tools. A learning check is helpful to ensure that attendees have absorbed the meeting material or messages and know how to use or apply it properly. It is also important at this level to determine the quantity and quality of new professional contacts acquired and whether existing professional contacts were strengthened due to the meeting. However, a positive measure at this level is no guarantee that what was learned or whether the professional contacts acquired will be used on the job.
At Level 3 - Job Applications, a variety of follow-up methods can be used to determine if attendees applied on the job what they learned or acquired at the meeting. The frequency and use of skills are important measures at Level 3. While Level 3 evaluations are important to gauge the success of the meeting, it still does not guarantee that there will be a positive business impact in the organization or for the attendee.
At Level 4 - Business Results, the measurement focuses on the actual business results achieved by meeting participants as they successfully apply the meeting material or messages. Typical Level 4 measures include output, sales, quality, costs, time and customer satisfaction. Although the meeting may produce a measurable business impact, there is still a concern that the meeting may cost too much.
At Level 5 - Return on Investment, this ultimate level of measurement compares the monetary benefits from the meeting with the fully-loaded meeting costs as expressed in the ROI formula.
All levels of evaluation must be conducted in order to determine the ROI of a meeting or event. The data collected should show a chain of impact occurring through the levels as the skills and knowledge learned (Level 2) are applied on the job (Level 3) to produce business results (Level 4).
* Introduces and demonstrates Jack J. Phillips's well-established ROI measurement methodology
* Addresses the growing demands from stakeholders to prove the value of meetings through data
* Endorsed by MPI (Meeting Professionals International)
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的文字风格,与其说是一本商业指南,不如说更像是一部深刻的社会学观察笔记,带着一种冷静而略显批判性的色彩。它没有急于告诉读者“如何更省钱地开会”,反而是在质疑**“为什么我们开这么多会?”**。作者对企业内部冗余会议的剖析极其犀利,他用大量的案例揭示了“会议疲劳症”是如何悄无声息地吞噬员工的创造力和时间价值的。我尤其被其中关于“信息瀑布效应”的论述所触动——即信息在层层汇报中失真和冗余,而会议往往是这个失真过程的放大器。它提供的解决方案不是简单的“缩短会议时间”,而是主张建立“异步沟通优先”的文化,将同步会议视为最后且最高成本的决策手段。这种自上而下的颠覆性思维,让人在阅读过程中,不禁捏着笔,在自己的日程表上圈出那些可以被邮件或文档替代的会议,其思想冲击力远超一般的时间管理书籍。
评分最让我感到惊喜的是,这本书在探讨活动效益的最后阶段,引入了**“企业文化塑形”**这一宏大主题。它将大型会议——特别是那些外部可见的品牌活动(如产品发布会、年度庆典)——视为企业价值观的**“具身化体验”**。作者认为,一个活动的设计细节,从邀请函的用词、餐饮的选择,到演讲者的风格,都在向外界无声地宣告“我们是谁,我们珍视什么”。这种将“活动”提升到“文化传播载体”的论述,非常具有启发性。它不再是关于成本核算,而是关于“叙事权力”的争夺。这本书提供了一套评估框架,用以衡量一次品牌活动在多大程度上强化了企业的核心使命感和内部凝聚力,这无疑为公关和市场部门提供了强有力的理论支撑,将那些看似“虚浮”的品牌建设投入,赋予了清晰可见的战略意义。
评分这本书的叙事结构是极其复杂的,它并非线性的时间推进,而更像是一张围绕“人”展开的价值网络图。它将会议和活动的主体,从传统的“组织者”扩展到了**“参与者画像”**和**“利益相关者地图”**的绘制上。我发现,作者花了大量篇幅来讨论如何识别和平衡不同层级参与者的动机差异——比如高管的战略需求、中层的执行顾虑,以及新员工的学习渴望。书中提出的“参与者价值匹配模型”,要求活动策划者必须在资源分配前,为每一类参与者定义其期望获得的**非物质收益**(如行业地位提升、特定知识获取)。这种以人为本、先界定“人”的价值再设计“场”的理念,彻底改变了我以往那种“先定主题和场地,再拉人头”的思维定势。它让人意识到,没有被精准触达的参与者,任何形式的投入都是浪费。
评分这本书的视角着实令人耳目一新,它巧妙地将我们习以为常的“会议与活动”从纯粹的行政操作层面,一下子拉升到了战略投资的高度。我特别欣赏作者对于投入产出比(ROI)的量化分析模型,那绝非是那种浮于表面的、空泛的“感觉良好”的指标,而是深入到了**知识沉淀、关系资本增值以及长期品牌忠诚度构建**的具体操作层面。读完后,我立刻反思了过去组织大型行业峰会时,仅仅关注了参会人数和现场满意度,却忽略了会后知识转化的效率。书中详细拆解了如何通过会前精准的目标设定、会中互动的深度设计,以及会后效果的追踪与反馈机制,真正让每一次差旅和场地租赁的费用,都转化为可衡量的组织能力提升。尤其是它提出的一种“延迟满足感”的评估体系,认可了某些高价值活动(比如团队建设或战略研讨会)的价值释放周期较长,这极大地拓宽了我对“投资回报”的认知边界。这种由内而外、由虚到实的分析框架,让原本让人头疼的预算审批环节,变成了一场充满逻辑美感的商业论证。
评分从技术和工具使用的角度来看,这本书的实用价值同样不可小觑,但它的切入点非常独特:不是推销最新的协作软件,而是讨论**技术如何被误用,从而反噬会议的投资回报**。作者对虚拟会议和混合式活动的深入分析,体现了对当前工作形态的深刻洞察。他强调,沉浸感和连接感是活动价值的核心,而糟糕的技术设置(比如音视频延迟、平台操作复杂性)会直接导致用户体验断崖式下跌,进而使得原本期望达成的协作目标彻底落空。我注意到书中详细对比了几种主流虚拟平台在“情感连接”和“内容分享”两大维度上的适配性,并提供了一套详尽的“技术风险预案清单”。这套清单极其细致,涵盖了网络带宽测试、备用电源预案,甚至包括了主持人对突发技术故障时的情绪引导话术。这表明,作者深知,在数字化时代,活动的成功与否,一半取决于内容,另一半取决于那根稳定可靠的“数据线”。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有