Although we have come to regard 'clinical' and 'romantic' as oppositional terms, romantic literature and clinical medicine were fed by the same cultural configurations. In the pre-Darwinian nineteenth century, writers and doctors developed an interpretive method that negotiated between literary and scientific knowledge of the natural world. Literary writers produced potent myths that juxtaposed the natural and the supernatural, often disturbing the conventional dualist hierarchy of spirit over flesh. Clinicians developed the two-part history and physical examination, weighing the patient's narrative against the evidence of the body. Examining fiction by Mary Shelley, Carlyle, the Brontes and George Eliot, alongside biomedical lectures, textbooks and articles, Janis McLarren Caldwell demonstrates the similar ways of reading employed by nineteenth-century doctors and imaginative writers and reveals the complexities and creative exchanges of the relationship between literature and medicine.
評分
評分
評分
評分
哲學和闡釋學框架我個人覺得使用的篇幅有點多。
评分Exploration of spiritual and corporeal relationship through reference to or connotation of intersection between theology and medicine in Romantic literary pieces.
评分哲學和闡釋學框架我個人覺得使用的篇幅有點多。
评分Exploration of spiritual and corporeal relationship through reference to or connotation of intersection between theology and medicine in Romantic literary pieces.
评分Exploration of spiritual and corporeal relationship through reference to or connotation of intersection between theology and medicine in Romantic literary pieces.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有