Is Theory dead? Is it, as skeptics suggest, too distant from anything 'real' to be useful, too sweeping in its referral of all texts to grand theses? Or is it a mask for fashion and self-promotion in academia? In this controversial manifesto, Jean-Michel Rabate addresses current anxieties about theory and claims that it still has a crucial role to play. Acknowledging that he cannot speak about the future of theory without taking stock of its past, Rabate starts by sketching its genealogy, particularly its relation to surrealism, philosophy, and the hard sciences. Against this background, he proposes that theory, like hysteria, consistently points out the inadequacies of official, serious and 'masterful' knowledge. Its role, he suggests, is to ask difficult, foundational questions, which entail revisionary readings of culture and its texts. In this way, Rabate claims, whether the theory of the moment is structuralism or globalization, theory in its broader sense will always return, providing us with provocative and stimulating insights into what we do and how we read.
评分
评分
评分
评分
哎 还是蛮失望的吧 不可避免的落入了post-structuralism 'always asking the right questions without offering any answers'的窠臼 还不如当成history of theory的课本去读
评分哎 还是蛮失望的吧 不可避免的落入了post-structuralism 'always asking the right questions without offering any answers'的窠臼 还不如当成history of theory的课本去读
评分哎 还是蛮失望的吧 不可避免的落入了post-structuralism 'always asking the right questions without offering any answers'的窠臼 还不如当成history of theory的课本去读
评分当然啦,未来只有最后一张啦其实。作者对法国理论运动非常了解,整体是对这一运动的回顾和评估。结论可想而知的是那种模稜两可的后现代味道。整体文风很后现代。。较难把握。总的来说,和大多数后现代理论阐释一样,没什么意思,却一个劲地围绕后结构视为珍宝的「要有意思」的口号。。。
评分当然啦,未来只有最后一张啦其实。作者对法国理论运动非常了解,整体是对这一运动的回顾和评估。结论可想而知的是那种模稜两可的后现代味道。整体文风很后现代。。较难把握。总的来说,和大多数后现代理论阐释一样,没什么意思,却一个劲地围绕后结构视为珍宝的「要有意思」的口号。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有