From Library Journal Bronner， legal affairs reporter for the Boston Globe ， has written an excellent account of Robert Bork's unsuccessful nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. The selection of Bork， whose previous judicial decisions restricted the scope of individual liberties， was a central part of the Reagan administration's shift away from 1950s and 1960s approaches to civil rights. Bronner uncovers conflicts in Bork's legal positions and how these disparities led to major controversies in the Senate hearings. The nomination also mobilized an effective grass-roots anti-Bork campaign and caused infighting between the White House and Justice Department. A clear presentation of a legally and politically complex situation. BOMC selection.- Steve Puro， St. Louis Univ .Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information， Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有