Pinocchio knows: the unconscious knowledge of the conscious lie.
From little white lies to the deepest, darkest ones, it is an accepted fact that we—like the boy who cried wolf—lie very often, at least three times a day. The thesis of this erudite and entertaining book is that lies are structured like paradoxes. Lying is a common social manifestation that is fraught with contradictions: we lie quite frequently, but we hate liars, and we detest above all being lied to. We know that most politicians lie, hoping that they lie reasonably, as it were, but when they are caught in the act, their careers are ruined. The common root to these phenomena goes back to the paradigmatic figure of the paradox: I am lying but I tell the truth when I say that I am lying.
In The Ethics of the Lie, Jean-Michel Rabaté examines this ancient problem in a new light, starting with a contemporary American context. He enters into the web of lies spun by the media, turns the microscope on the U.S. presidency, explores the dynamics of family lies, and even analyzes Hollywood's role in reenacting these dilemmas. Do we live in an age when disinformation has reached such a fevered pitch that we can dismiss everything presented as "fact" or "news"? In questioning this widespread skepticism, Rabaté deconstructs the pathology of lies and their logical mechanisms, leading us back to the continuing debates of the great philosophers and their philosophical foundations—Plato, Nietzsche, and Aristotle—and in doing so, swears to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Jean-Michel Rabaté, Professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of Pennsylvania since 1992, has published about fifteen books on Samuel Beckett, Thomas Bernhard, Ezra Pound, James Joyce, psychoanalysis and literary theory. His most recent books include The Ghosts of Modernity, (University of Florida Press, 1996), Joyce and the Politics of Egoism (Cambridge UP, 2001) and Jacques Lacan and Literature (Palgrave, 2001). He has recently edited two collections of essays, Writing the Image after Roland Barthes, (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997) and Jacques Lacan in America (The Other Press, Fall 2000), The Cambridge Companion to Jacques Lacan. (2002) and The Future of Theory (Blackwell, 2002). Recent publications: (2003 Cambridge) Companion to Lacan, editor, 2003 On the diagram: the art of Marjorie Welish, co-edited with Aaron Levy, (2004 Palgrave) Advances to James Joyce, editor, 2004 Architecture Against death: On Arakwa and Gins, two volumes, editor, and 2005 Logiques du Mensonge, Calmann- Levy. Most recent publications William Anastasi’s Pataphysical Society, co-edited, Slought, 2005, Companion pour Jacques Lacan, Bayard, 2005., Given: 1) Art, 2) Crime, Sussex University Press, 2006, Helene Cixous--On Cities, co-edited, Slought, 2006, Lacan Literario, Siglo 21, 2007,1913: The cradle of modernism, Blackwell, July 2007. Forthcoming: The Ethic of the Lie, The Other Press, 2008.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部作品最出彩的地方,在于它对“语境”的极端重视,它拒绝了任何形式的教条主义,转而深入到每一个微观决策的生成土壤中去探究。作者的语言处理非常巧妙,擅长使用那些看似中性的词汇,去构建一个充满悖论的世界。我花了大量时间去琢磨它对“善意”的定义如何随着时间和社会环境而扭曲变形的论述。这本书的价值,并不在于提供一个放之四海而皆准的道德指南,而在于提供了一套极其精密的分析工具,让你能够解构你所面对的每一个道德困境。它让你明白,很多时候,我们所谓的“对”与“错”,不过是选择了一个更容易被群体接受的叙事框架而已。这是一种非常高级的、反思性的阅读体验,它让你在合上书本之后,看世界的眼光都变得复杂和多维了。
评分这本书的叙事节奏把握得真是绝了,它不像传统哲学著作那样干巴巴地堆砌论点,而是巧妙地融入了一种近乎悬疑小说的张力。我感觉自己像个侦探,跟着作者在错综复杂的道德迷宫里穿行。最让我着迷的是它对“动机”与“结果”之间关系的细致入微的分析,那种辩证法的运用炉火纯青,让你在刚为一个观点拍手叫绝时,马上又被另一个反驳的视角击中,然后陷入沉思。它没有简单地站队,而是搭建了一个宏大的思想竞技场,让所有观点自由搏击。这种处理方式,使得原本可能枯燥的伦理学探讨变得鲜活而具有侵略性,它主动出击,直指人心最柔软却又最坚硬的那部分。我一口气读完,合上书页时,发现自己对身边一些看似平常的场景,产生了全新的、近乎审判的视角。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读过程充满了挣扎,这并非因为内容晦涩难懂,而是因为它的核心观点太过颠覆性,需要你不断地推翻自己建立已久的道德直觉。作者的论证逻辑像是一台精密运作的机器,每一个环节都扣得死死的,不留一丝喘息的机会。它迫使读者走出舒适区,去直面那些我们习惯于用“情境特殊”来为自己开脱的时刻。我特别关注了其中关于“信息不对称”下的道德责任部分,那段论述让我对现代信息传播中的许多行为,产生了更深层次的警惕。这已经超越了一般的伦理学讨论,更像是一部关于权力、知识与道德操纵的深度剖析报告。读完后,我感觉自己的“道德肌肉”被过度操练了一番,疲惫,但充满了力量。
评分说实话,这本书的文笔是极具个人风格的,那种冷静到近乎冷酷的疏离感,反而更增添了其论证的力度。作者似乎站在一个极高的瞭望塔上俯瞰人类的道德实践,其洞察力之锐利,让人心惊。它对社会契约的那些细微裂痕的捕捉,堪称一绝,仿佛是用一把手术刀在剖开社会的表皮,直达肌理。我尤其欣赏其中对于“集体性谎言”的探讨,那部分内容让我联想到很多历史事件和社会现象,它揭示了为了维持某种表面的和谐或既得利益,社会机制是如何集体性地参与构建一个心照不宣的“非真相”世界的。这种对结构性虚伪的揭露,让我对日常交流中的“客套话”都产生了生理性的不适。如果你期待读到一本让你感到安慰的书,那你最好避开它;但如果你渴望一场彻底的智力洗礼,这本书是为数不多的选择。
评分天哪,这本书简直是场思想的角斗!我得说,作者在探讨“界限”这件事上,达到了一个令人不安却又无比清醒的境界。它不是那种你在咖啡馆里轻松翻阅的读物,更像是一场深潜,把你带到那些我们通常选择视而不见的人性幽暗角落。我尤其欣赏它对“必要之恶”的解构,那种抽丝剥茧的手法,让人不得不重新审视自己日常生活中那些微不足道的妥协和粉饰太平。读完之后,你很难再用非黑即白的标准去评判任何复杂的人际互动。那种对灰色地带的精准描摹,仿佛是高分辨率的X光片,照亮了我们习惯性忽略的骨骼结构。它没有给你廉价的答案,反而是抛出了一系列更尖锐、更难缠的问题,让你在接下来的日子里,走路都会不自觉地思考每一步的“正当性”。这种阅读体验是痛苦的,但绝对是值得的,因为它挑战了我们自以为坚固的道德高地。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有