Dr Dover Wilson examines Falstaff's role in the two parts of Henry IV and his relationship to the Prince. Like most other Shakespearean scholars he had accepted, Bradley's portrait as shown in The Rejection of Falstaff, until (as he writes) he 'began checking it with yet another portrait - that which I found in the pages of Shakespeare himself. As the result of much recent work on the two parts of Henry IV, a new Falstaff stands before me, as fascinating as Bradley's, certainly quite as human, but different; and beside him stands a still more unexpected Prince Hal. The discovery throws all my previous ideas out of focus.' As the reviewer in the Times Literary Supplement wrote, Falstaff 'is no hero, as the romantics have tried to make him out, nor is he merely a typical and traditional stage-butt. But he is Falstaff riding for a fall; and when he takes his toss he is up again in still unconquerable effrontery and humour ...The Prince as we watch him through Dr Dover Wilson's eyes growing in grace, first in chivalry and then in justice, we do more than observe the making of a hero-king. We get to know a very lovable, faulty, generous, noble-minded young man; and a character in the play whose scenes are so far from being mere padding between Falstaff's that the whole is seen as a masterpiece of construction.'
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
類型化、道德化的解讀，《亨利四世》的模式簡化為misrule與law之間的靈魂選擇。
评分類型化、道德化的解讀，《亨利四世》的模式簡化為misrule與law之間的靈魂選擇。
评分作者是個福斯塔夫黑！但是黑的部分寫得最好，其他讀著就有些尷尬，尤其是字裏行間滿溢著對哈利王子的愛的時候。。。。
评分類型化、道德化的解讀，《亨利四世》的模式簡化為misrule與law之間的靈魂選擇。
评分類型化、道德化的解讀，《亨利四世》的模式簡化為misrule與law之間的靈魂選擇。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有