China’s role in the history of world animation has been trivialized or largely forgotten. In Animated Encounters Daisy Yan Du addresses this omission in her study of Chinese animation and its engagement with international forces during its formative period, the 1940s–1970s. She introduces readers to transnational movements in early Chinese animation, tracing the involvement of Japanese, Soviet, American, Taiwanese, and China’s ethnic minorities, at socio-historical or representational levels, in animated filmmaking in China. Du argues that Chinese animation was international almost from its inception and that such border-crossing exchanges helped make it “Chinese” and subsequently transform the history of world animation. She highlights animated encounters and entanglements to provide an alternative to current studies of the subject characterized by a preoccupation with essentialist ideas of “Chineseness” and further questions the long-held belief that the forty-year-period in question was a time of cultural isolationism for China due to constant wars and revolutions.
China’s socialist era, known for the pervasiveness of its political propaganda and suppression of the arts, unexpectedly witnessed a golden age of animation. Socialist collectivism, reinforced by totalitarian politics and centralized state control, allowed Chinese animation to prosper and flourish artistically. In addition, the double marginality of animation—a minor art form for children—coupled with its disarming qualities and intrinsic malleability and mobility, granted animators and producers the double power to play with politics and transgress ideological and geographical borders while surviving censorship, both at home and abroad.
A captivating and enlightening history, Animated Encounters will attract scholars and students of world film and animation studies, children’s culture, and modern Chinese history.
评分
评分
评分
评分
虽然大家很难和拉马尔去拼动画本体论,这样的研究不是更需要吗?
评分书最大的缺憾在于未能把握毛主义时期的最重要特征,即毛时期国家的社会主义性质(因此也就未能从共产主义运动内部的逻辑来理解民族主义和国际主义、艺术与政治等范畴的辩证关系),而是将这些时期贴上诸如威权主义、极权主义的标签(作者声称要和传统的中国电影研究划清界限,因为这些传统的研究认为毛时期的文学和艺术不过是严格服务于政府的宣传艺术。作者看似挑战这些传统研究的结论实际上恰恰印证着:作者依然延续着这些主流研究对于毛时期的认识)。于是,艺术和政治的关系就被简化为控制与被控制,审查与被审查,艺术创造的质量似乎就只受制于政治干涉的强弱。因此,对艺术和政治更深层次的辩证关系讨论也被忽视和搁置了。
评分虽然大家很难和拉马尔去拼动画本体论,这样的研究不是更需要吗?
评分虽然大家很难和拉马尔去拼动画本体论,这样的研究不是更需要吗?
评分噴飯。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有