The state of Tibetan culture within contemporary China is a highly politicized topic on which reliable information is rare. But what is Tibetan culture and how should it be developed or preserved? The Chinese authorities and the Tibetans in exile present conflicting views on almost every aspect of Tibetan cultural life.
Ashild Kolas and Monika Thowsen have gathered an astounding array of data to quantify Tibetan cultural activities - involving Tibetan language, literature, visual arts, museums, performing arts, festivals, and religion. Their study is based on fieldwork and interviews conducted in the ethnic Tibetan areas surrounding the Tibetan Autonomous Region - parts of the Chinese provinces of Sichuan, Gansu, Yunnan, and Qinghai. Aware of the ambiguous nature of information collected in restricted circumstances, they make every effort to present a complete and unbiased picture of Tibetan communities living on China's western frontiers.
Kolas and Thowsen investigate the present conditions of Tibetan cultural life and cultural expression, providing a wealth of detailed information on topics such as the number of restored monasteries and nunneries and the number of monks, nuns, and tulkus (reincarnated lamas) affiliated with them; sources of funding for monastic reconstruction and financial support of clerics; types of religious ceremonies being practiced; the content of monastic and secular education; school attendance; educational curriculum and funding; the role of language in Tibetan schools; and Tibetan news and cultural media.
On the Margins of Tibet will be of interest to historians and social scientists studying modern China and Tibetan culture, and to the many others concerned about Tibet's place in the world.
Ashild Kolas and Monika P. Thowsen collaborated on this book while serving as researchers at the International Peace Research Institute (PRIO), Oslo.
评分
评分
评分
评分
阅读体验是一场持续的、引人入胜的智力探险。这本书的行文结构非常巧妙,它并非采用线性的时间推进,而是像一幅由无数碎片精密拼接而成的马赛克,每一章都像是一块独立的、打磨精良的宝石,散发着不同的光芒。有时候,它像是一部扎实的民族志,深入探讨了某个特定社群的亲属关系或仪式变迁;但下一刻,它又会突然转向历史文献的细致考据,对某个被遗忘的条约或古老地图上的标记进行深入的批判性分析。这种在人类学深度与历史学广度之间的无缝切换,极大地丰富了文本的层次感。真正高明之处在于,作者总能将这些看似不相关的碎片,用一种内在的逻辑线索串联起来,最终汇聚成对特定区域复杂性的深刻理解。这不是一本能让人轻松翻阅的书,它要求读者保持专注,但给予的回报是丰厚的——一种对复杂性本身的欣赏。
评分坦率地说,这本书的论证过程充满了挑战性,但其洞察力是毋庸置疑的。作者似乎对既有的学术范式持有一种审慎的、近乎解构的态度。在很多关键的议题上,他/她并不急于给出一个简单的“是”或“否”的结论,而是倾向于展示矛盾的共存性。例如,在处理文化适应与文化抵抗这两个主题时,书中揭示了两者如何如同太极般相互依存、彼此成就。某些论点初读之下似乎有些晦涩,需要反复咀嚼,特别是那些涉及权力关系和符号解读的部分,需要读者跳出日常思维的舒适区。但一旦理解了作者构建的逻辑框架,那种豁然开朗的感觉是无与伦比的。它不是在提供答案,而是在教会我们如何更恰当地提出问题,尤其是在面对那些难以被既有理论完全概括的地域时。这绝对是一部对领域内既有知识体系进行有效“扰动”的作品。
评分这本书的语言风格达到了艺术的高度,与其探讨的主题相得益彰。它绝非枯燥的学术报告,而更像是一系列精心编排的田野笔记的集合,充满了强烈的画面感和内在的节奏。作者的遣词造句考究而精准,尤其擅长使用那些精准描绘空间感和时间感的词汇,使得读者在阅读时仿佛能感受到时间的缓慢流逝,以及地理环境对人类命运的无形塑造。有时候,句子结构会变得非常长,充满了复杂的从句和修饰语,这并非是为了炫技,而是为了尽可能完整地捕捉住现实世界的复杂性——避免用过于简化的语法来扼杀现实的丰富性。这种内敛而深沉的笔触,使得即便是最残酷或最令人沮丧的发现,也被包裹在一层令人敬畏的、近乎诗意的观察之中,让人在震撼之余,依然保持着对生命力的尊重。
评分从社会影响力的角度来看,这本书的意义是深远的,它有效地填补了当前研究领域中的一个重要空白。在当今全球化叙事日益强势的背景下,许多边缘地带的声音和经验正面临被彻底稀释或同质化的风险。这本书勇敢地站出来,为那些处于文化碰撞前沿、承受着巨大结构性压力的社群提供了强有力的文献支持和思想武器。它不仅仅是对过去的回顾,更是对未来发展路径的一种深刻反思。通过展示这些“边缘”经验如何重塑了我们对核心地带的理解,作者成功地颠覆了传统的“中心-边缘”二元对立。阅读完后,我感觉自己对“地理”的理解已经不再仅仅是地图上的界限,而是由无数相互渗透、相互作用的历史、权力与记忆构成的动态场域。它促使我们重新审视,究竟是谁在书写历史,以及这种书写方式带来了怎样的后果。
评分这本书的叙事视角实在是太迷人了。作者似乎拥有一种近乎魔术般的能力,能将我们瞬间拉入一个充满未知与原始力量的地理空间。那种关于边陲地带的描写,不是那种教科书式的冷冰冰的地理记录,而是充满了感官的细节。你能清晰地感受到高海拔空气中那种稀薄而凛冽的触感,能闻到炉火燃烧时特有的烟草和酥油混合的味道。更重要的是,作者对那些被主流历史叙事边缘化的人群的关注,让人印象深刻。他/她没有用宏大的、居高临下的视角去评判,而是像一个耐心的邻居,记录下他们日常生活的细微纹理——那些关于信仰的坚持、关于生存的智慧,以及在极端环境下发展出的独特社会结构。这种“在边缘观察”的姿态,使得整部作品在保持学术严谨性的同时,又充满了文学的温度和人性的光辉。我特别欣赏那些关于地方性知识的呈现,它们挑战了我们对“文明”和“进步”的刻板印象,迫使读者重新审视自己所处的世界观的边界。
评分The geographical area that the authors surveyed is amazingly broad. As they have acknowledged, the writing is "descriptive." A little more analysis might be great.
评分The geographical area that the authors surveyed is amazingly broad. As they have acknowledged, the writing is "descriptive." A little more analysis might be great.
评分The geographical area that the authors surveyed is amazingly broad. As they have acknowledged, the writing is "descriptive." A little more analysis might be great.
评分The geographical area that the authors surveyed is amazingly broad. As they have acknowledged, the writing is "descriptive." A little more analysis might be great.
评分The geographical area that the authors surveyed is amazingly broad. As they have acknowledged, the writing is "descriptive." A little more analysis might be great.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有