The rising tide of ethnic nationalism that has swept across Central Asia in the past decade has energized efforts by the Chinese government to win favor among its ethnic minorities. As a result, China has granted the Uyghurs -- a Turkic Muslim people who inhabit the oases of China's far northwestern province, Xinjiang -- special previledges, opening up international borders, reestablishing long-severed transborder contacts and trade networks, and allowing intellectuals the liberty to construct their own versions of Uyghur history.
From the outset, however, this process has been problematic, heightening intra and interoasis tensions. Greater freedoms for the Uyghur people have threatened China's economic, ideological, and military control over this vital region and have produced resistance movements and separatist terror attacks. In this study, a leading expert on Central Aisa explores the history, culture, politics, and geography of Xinjiang's oasis communities, shedding new light on the competing ideas, symbols, and allegiances that make up the many diverse Uyghur identities.
Drawing upon extensive fieldwork in the Xinjiang oasis of Turpan, Justin Jon Rudelson assesses the factors that undermine the creation of a pan-Uyghur identity. He explains the historical and contemporary impact of the geography of the region, where oases are relatively isolated from one another; the fragmented visions and cross-cutting allegiances of the three major social groups (intellectuals, peasants, and merchants); and the inability of the Uyghur elite who spearheaded the nationalist movement to transcend their own provincialism, thereby engendering rival oasis identities and subverting ethnic unity.
Oasis identities is a vivid, ground-breaking work offering insight into not only the trumoil besetting this important but little-studied region but also the barriers facing all emerging nations and cultures struggling to define their national identities.
Justin Jon Rudelson is an assistant professor of anthropology at Tulane University.
评分
评分
评分
评分
1.没有讨论民族概念本身,2.没谈mazar pilgrimage在绿洲认同中的角色,3.19位维吾尔知识分子的样本太小,4.乌鲁木齐汉人都不了解维吾尔文化(P124),民考汉在家都说汉语(P127),类似论述都很有问题。
评分可惜了,后面作者没有机会再来做更多的田野了。很多地方的印象都很深:1)吐鲁番的民族主义者指望日本游客像汉人恨日本人一样恨汉人,结果惊讶的发现they do not give a shit; 2)第三章开头那段Uyghur, Nazi, Afghan的故事
评分开篇将印象中单一的新疆分成地理三大片区论述,南方喀什的伊斯兰教sufi顽固,khotan受北印影响较深;北方的伊犁和前苏联有牵扯;东方的吐鲁番和哈密史上与国内交往甚密。由于不同片区相异的身份认同,维族知识分子在统一的民族叙事中权重各有不同,难以达成共识,形成足够的影响力。
评分开篇将印象中单一的新疆分成地理三大片区论述,南方喀什的伊斯兰教sufi顽固,khotan受北印影响较深;北方的伊犁和前苏联有牵扯;东方的吐鲁番和哈密史上与国内交往甚密。由于不同片区相异的身份认同,维族知识分子在统一的民族叙事中权重各有不同,难以达成共识,形成足够的影响力。
评分可惜了,后面作者没有机会再来做更多的田野了。很多地方的印象都很深:1)吐鲁番的民族主义者指望日本游客像汉人恨日本人一样恨汉人,结果惊讶的发现they do not give a shit; 2)第三章开头那段Uyghur, Nazi, Afghan的故事
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有