具体描述
this book offers a new interpretation of socialism and its failure in the last century, and takes on the conventional view that socialist China and other Soviet-type societies represented the domination of bureaucracy. Using a wealth of original archival sources, interview data, and comparative material, Eddy U argues that these societies were not bureaucratic enough. The ruling regimes established a form of workplace administration that is the antithesis of modern bureaucratic organization. Because the workplace lacked rational rules and practices, Soviet-type societies were marred by technical inefficiency, political resentment, and social friction. But U does not merely expose workplace disorganization in Soviet-type societies; his theoretically and empirically grounded research raises questions about the contention that socialism has been proven unworkable. He concludes that strengthening the rational capacity of the state may still be the key to improving social and economic justice.
作者简介
Eddy U has tought in the Department of Chinese Studies at the University of Sydney, and is an associate professor of sociology at University of California, Davis.
目录信息
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Solidly and neatly argued scholarship, clear engagement with Weber. The analytical framework has the shell but not the content of going beyond Eurocentric paradigms, but some empirical observations are still useful. Shall read alongside Gross, Ghosh, and Andreas.The criticism of Neo Liberalism in the conclusion is inadequate or even unnecessary.
评分Solidly and neatly argued scholarship, clear engagement with Weber. The analytical framework has the shell but not the content of going beyond Eurocentric paradigms, but some empirical observations are still useful. Shall read alongside Gross, Ghosh, and Andreas.The criticism of Neo Liberalism in the conclusion is inadequate or even unnecessary.
评分Solidly and neatly argued scholarship, clear engagement with Weber. The analytical framework has the shell but not the content of going beyond Eurocentric paradigms, but some empirical observations are still useful. Shall read alongside Gross, Ghosh, and Andreas.The criticism of Neo Liberalism in the conclusion is inadequate or even unnecessary.
评分Solidly and neatly argued scholarship, clear engagement with Weber. The analytical framework has the shell but not the content of going beyond Eurocentric paradigms, but some empirical observations are still useful. Shall read alongside Gross, Ghosh, and Andreas.The criticism of Neo Liberalism in the conclusion is inadequate or even unnecessary.
评分Solidly and neatly argued scholarship, clear engagement with Weber. The analytical framework has the shell but not the content of going beyond Eurocentric paradigms, but some empirical observations are still useful. Shall read alongside Gross, Ghosh, and Andreas.The criticism of Neo Liberalism in the conclusion is inadequate or even unnecessary.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有