Disorganizing China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Eddy U

Stanford University Press

2007-6-28

296

USD 57.50

Hardcover

9780804756891

图书标签: 共和国中国研究 Politics

喜欢 Disorganizing China 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-11-28

Disorganizing China epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

Disorganizing China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

this book offers a new interpretation of socialism and its failure in the last century, and takes on the conventional view that socialist China and other Soviet-type societies represented the domination of bureaucracy. Using a wealth of original archival sources, interview data, and comparative material, Eddy U argues that these societies were not bureaucratic enough. The ruling regimes established a form of workplace administration that is the antithesis of modern bureaucratic organization. Because the workplace lacked rational rules and practices, Soviet-type societies were marred by technical inefficiency, political resentment, and social friction. But U does not merely expose workplace disorganization in Soviet-type societies; his theoretically and empirically grounded research raises questions about the contention that socialism has been proven unworkable. He concludes that strengthening the rational capacity of the state may still be the key to improving social and economic justice.

Disorganizing China 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

Eddy U has tought in the Department of Chinese Studies at the University of Sydney, and is an associate professor of sociology at University of California, Davis.

图书目录

Disorganizing China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Solidly and neatly argued scholarship, clear engagement with Weber. The analytical framework has the shell but not the content of going beyond Eurocentric paradigms, but some empirical observations are still useful. Shall read alongside Gross, Ghosh, and Andreas.The criticism of Neo Liberalism in the conclusion is inadequate or even unnecessary.

评分☆☆☆☆☆