Review
"This concise and elegantly written book examines how chiefs develop and maintain political power in prestate complex societies, or what anthropologists commonly refer to as chiefdoms. . . . [It] is path-breaking in its sophisticated dissection of the relationship between ideology and other sources of power that narrows the gap between cultural evolutionary, Marxist, symbolic, and human agency theories of complex society development."—The Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Sciences
"In the present volume, Earle weaves together variation and pattern to bring us the very best of anthropology. . . . [Earle's] latest work is a powerful synthesis of theory and data that leaves us with both a better understanding of the political economy of chiefdoms and a solid foundation for future research into critical questions about the origins and maintenance of centralized polities and systems of social control."—American Anthropologist
Product Description
By studying chiefdoms—kin-based societies in which a person’s place in a kinship system determines his or her social status and political position—this book addresses several fundamental questions concerning the nature of political power and the evolution of sociopolitical complexity. In a chiefdom, the highest-status male (first son by the first wife) holds both authority and special access to economic, military, and ideological power, and others derive privilege from their positions in the chiefly hierarchy.
A chiefdom is also a regional polity with institutional governance and some social stratification organizing a population of a few thousand to tens of thousands of people. The author argues that the fundamental dynamics of chiefdoms are essentially the same as those of states, and that the origin of states is to be understood in the emergence and development of chiefdoms. The history of chiefdoms documents the evolutionary trajectories that resulted, in some situations, in the institutionalization of broad-scale, politically centralized societies and, in others, in highly fragmented and unstable regions of competitive polities. Understanding the dynamics of chiefly society, the author asserts, offers an essential view into the historical background of the modern world.
Three cases on which the author has conducted extensive field research are used to develop the book’s arguments—Denmark during the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages (2300-1300 b.c.), the high Andes of Peru from the early chiefdoms through the Inka conquest (a.d. 500-1534), and Hawaii from early in its settlement to its incorporation in the world economy (a.d. 800-1824). Rather than deal with each case separately, the author presents an integrated discussion around the different power sources. After summarizing the cultural history of the three societies over a thousand years, he considers the sources of chiefly power and how these sources were linked together. The ultimate aim of the book is to determine how chiefs came to power and the implications that contrasting paths to power had for the evolutionary trajectories of societies. It attributes particular importance to the way different power bases were bound together and grounded in the political economy.
评分
评分
评分
评分
如果要用一个词来形容这本书给我的感受,那就是“颠覆”。它彻底挑战了我过去对“英雄史观”的固有认知。作者花了大量篇幅,详尽地剖析了那些被后世奉为圭臬的领袖,他们身上那些极不光彩的、充满妥协和偶然性的决策瞬间。这种对“光环褪色”过程的描绘,极具震撼力。书中对“危机管理”与“意识形态塑造”之间相互作用的论述,尤其精妙,它揭示了在权力真空期,最先填补空白的往往不是最强的那个人,而是那个最善于利用“叙事工具”的人。行文风格中流露出一种强烈的、近乎文学性的悲悯情怀,作者似乎在为那些在权力斗争中被无情淘汰的个体鸣不平,使得冰冷的权力分析带上了一丝人性的温度。对于那些研究政治变迁和社会结构的人来说,这本书无疑是一剂强心针,它提醒我们,权力从来不是永恒不变的结构,而是一个不断被重塑的动态过程。
评分老实说,我原本以为这会是一本偏向于枯燥的学术专著,结果出乎意料地引人入胜。作者对于“权力合法性”的探讨,简直是教科书级别的精彩。他没有采取传统的年代顺序叙事,而是围绕着几个核心的“权力转型期”进行结构化分析,这种跳跃性的时间轴反而加强了主题的连贯性。最让我印象深刻的是关于“象征资本”如何在瞬息万变的政治环境中被重新定义和利用的章节。书中通过对几个关键人物在危机时刻的公开演讲和肢体语言的分析,揭示了符号意义如何瞬间压倒物质力量的微妙过程。行文风格非常大胆且富有批判性,它不畏惧挑战既有的历史叙事,敢于对那些被神化的“伟人”进行解构,将其还原为在特定历史语境下做出选择的个体。阅读过程中,我常常需要停下来,反复咀嚼那些充满思辨性的长句,体会其中蕴含的复杂逻辑链条。这本书更像是一把精密的解剖刀,剖开了权力运作的肌理,让人看得心惊肉跳,却又欲罢不能。
评分这本书的学术深度毋庸置疑,但更难能可贵的是它在普及性上的成功。作者似乎深谙如何与读者进行一场智力上的“对话”。他没有使用过多不必要的学术术语堆砌,即使在讨论复杂的社会契约理论时,也能用极为清晰、近乎口语化的表达将其阐述清楚。我特别喜欢它关于“精英代际更迭”的章节,描述了旧的统治阶层是如何通过巧妙的制度设计,实现对新生力量的吸纳或排斥,从而确保其核心地位的延续性。这种对权力“内循环”的洞察力,极其深刻。在阅读过程中,我感觉自己不是在被动接受知识,而是在与一位博学的导师并肩探索未知的领域。书中的图表和案例分析简洁明了,有效地支撑了核心论点,极大地提升了信息吸收的效率。总而言之,这是一本既能满足专业人士的严谨需求,又能让普通历史爱好者感到酣畅淋漓的佳作。
评分这本书的叙事方式真是让人耳目一新,作者似乎有一种天赋,能将那些看似平淡无奇的历史事件,描绘得如同史诗般波澜壮阔。我尤其欣赏它在构建人物性格上的细腻处理,那些被后世简单标签化的领袖们,在这里展现出了复杂的人性挣扎与权谋智慧。书中对不同文化背景下权力更迭模式的对比分析,深度和广度都远超我的预期。它没有停留于表层的事件罗列,而是深入挖掘了权力基础的哲学根源和实际运作机制,那种抽丝剥茧的论证过程,充满了洞察力。比如,对早期部落联盟中“共识”的形成与瓦解过程的描述,那种细致到日常仪式和口头传说的捕捉,让我仿佛置身于那个时代,亲眼见证了秩序是如何从混沌中诞生的。作者的语言驾驭能力极强,时而如哲人般深邃,时而又像一个经验丰富的说书人,引人入胜,让人在不知不觉中,就吸收了大量原本可能枯燥的社会学和人类学知识。这是一部真正意义上的智力探险,读完之后,你会对“领导力”这个概念产生一种全新的、去魅化的理解。
评分这本书的阅读体验是震撼的,它成功地将宏大的历史叙事与微观的社会心理学观察完美地融合在了一起。我尤其欣赏作者在处理不同地理区域的案例时,所展现出的那种全球视野和跨文化敏感度。它并没有简单地将西方模式视为普适标准,而是详尽地展示了在气候、资源分配乃至宗教信仰差异下,权力结构如何演化出截然不同的面貌。那种对地方性知识的尊重和深入挖掘,使得全书的论证基石无比坚实。文字的节奏把握得极好,时而是快速的、信息密集的段落,用来阐述复杂的理论框架;时而又会放缓下来,用一两个精妙的比喻来巩ட்ட清那些晦涩的概念。对于那些渴望从历史中寻找现代社会治理启示的读者来说,这本书提供了绝佳的参照系。它迫使我们去思考,我们习以为常的“权威”是如何一步步被建构起来的,以及这种建构在多大程度上是脆弱和可变的。
评分历史唯物主义的史前政治经济学《赵家人是如何成为赵家人的》,比本朝上一辈那些仪式性引两句马列交差的高到不知道哪里去了。
评分历史唯物主义的史前政治经济学《赵家人是如何成为赵家人的》,比本朝上一辈那些仪式性引两句马列交差的高到不知道哪里去了。
评分历史唯物主义的史前政治经济学《赵家人是如何成为赵家人的》,比本朝上一辈那些仪式性引两句马列交差的高到不知道哪里去了。
评分历史唯物主义的史前政治经济学《赵家人是如何成为赵家人的》,比本朝上一辈那些仪式性引两句马列交差的高到不知道哪里去了。
评分历史唯物主义的史前政治经济学《赵家人是如何成为赵家人的》,比本朝上一辈那些仪式性引两句马列交差的高到不知道哪里去了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有