When these essays first appeared in "Artforum" in 1976, their impact was immediate. They were discussed, annotated, cited, collected, and translated - the three issues of "Artforum" in which they appeared have become nearly impossible to obtain. Having Brian O'Doherty's provocative essays available again is a signal event for the art world. This edition also includes "The Gallery as Gesture," a critically important piece published ten years after the others. O'Doherty was the first to explicitly confront a particular crisis in postwar art as he sought to examine the assumptions on which the modern commercial and museum gallery was based. Concerned with the complex and sophisticated relationship between economics, social context, and aesthetics as represented in the contested space of the art gallery, he raises the question of how artists must construe their work in relation to the gallery space and system. These essays are essential reading for anyone interested in the history and issues of postwar art in Europe and the United States. Teeming with ideas, relentless in their pursuit of contradiction and paradox, they exhibit both the understanding of the artist (Patrick Ireland) and the precision of the scholar.
1. Ideology of the Gallery Space In his book Inside the White Cube, the Ideology of the Gallery Space (which consists of three essays he first published in the magazine Artforum in 1976), O' Doherty tries to make explicit the ideology that underlies the mo...
评分1. Ideology of the Gallery Space In his book Inside the White Cube, the Ideology of the Gallery Space (which consists of three essays he first published in the magazine Artforum in 1976), O' Doherty tries to make explicit the ideology that underlies the mo...
评分1. Ideology of the Gallery Space In his book Inside the White Cube, the Ideology of the Gallery Space (which consists of three essays he first published in the magazine Artforum in 1976), O' Doherty tries to make explicit the ideology that underlies the mo...
评分1. Ideology of the Gallery Space In his book Inside the White Cube, the Ideology of the Gallery Space (which consists of three essays he first published in the magazine Artforum in 1976), O' Doherty tries to make explicit the ideology that underlies the mo...
评分1. Ideology of the Gallery Space In his book Inside the White Cube, the Ideology of the Gallery Space (which consists of three essays he first published in the magazine Artforum in 1976), O' Doherty tries to make explicit the ideology that underlies the mo...
这本书的封面设计简直是一场视觉的盛宴,那种极简主义的美学,线条的运用精准得仿佛出自大师之手,让人在书店里一眼就被它那种沉静又带着一丝疏离的气质所吸引。我是在寻找一本能让我暂时逃离日常喧嚣、沉浸在纯粹审美体验中的读物时,偶然发现了它。拿到手的那一刻,纸张的质感、油墨的触感,都透露出一种精心打磨过的匠心。它不是那种喧哗着要抓住你眼球的畅销书,它更像是一个深谙内敛之道的智者,静静地伫立在那里,邀请你用更缓慢、更专注的方式去接触它。书脊的设计也颇具巧思,那种微妙的凹凸感,让每一次的翻阅都成为一种仪式。我特别喜欢它内页留白的处理,大片的白色空间不仅仅是为了排版的美观,它更像是一种呼吸的空间,让每一个字、每一个段落都能得到充分的“呼吸”,从而更好地将读者的思绪引向更深层次的体验。这本书的整体设计语言,无疑是成功地营造了一种高级而克制的氛围,这本身就是一种无声的叙事,成功地为接下来的阅读体验定下了基调,让人对接下来的内容充满了好奇与期待。
评分这本书带给我的思考是极其长远的,它并非那种读完就束之高阁的消遣读物。它更像是一剂慢性的“思想催化剂”,在你合上封面的那一刻,它并没有停止工作。在接下来的几天里,我发现自己看世界的视角都有了微妙的转变。原本习以为常的场景,似乎被这本书赋予了一种新的“观看方式”,我开始注意到那些日常生活中被匆忙忽略的、微妙的纹理、色彩的渐变,以及人与空间之间复杂的关系。它成功地在读者的心智中植入了一种更具批判性、更强调“在场感”的观察模式。这本书的价值不在于它告诉你什么,而在于它如何改变了你思考“什么”的方式。这是一种非常高级的文本体验,它将知识的传递转化成了一种心智模式的重塑,让我对未来再次翻开它,充满了期待,因为我知道,每一次重温,都将是一次新的发现之旅。
评分从内容结构上来说,这本书展现出一种近乎建筑学上的严谨性。每一章节的衔接都像是一个精心设计的转角,看似独立,实则承载着通往下一空间的关键。它不是传统的章节叙事,更像是一组相互关联的“展品”,每一件展品都有其独立的逻辑和美感,但只有当它们被放置在整个“展览”的框架内时,其深层的主题才得以彰显。我特别喜欢它如何处理信息密度——有的部分信息量极大,需要反复研读才能理清头绪;而有的部分则极其简洁,用寥寥数语就构建了一个完整的意境。这种张弛有度的节奏控制,让读者在精神上不会感到持续的疲劳,总能在恰当的时机得到片刻的喘息,然后又被引导至下一个需要深度思考的节点。它像是一部精心编排的交响乐,不同乐章之间有着微妙的呼应与对比,让人在听觉(或阅读)的体验中感受到结构的力量。
评分我花了整整一个周末的时间来阅读这本书,那种沉浸感是近来少有的。它并没有采用那种跌宕起伏的叙事手法,反而更像是带领读者进行了一次漫长而细致的“行走观察”。作者的笔触极其细腻,对于细节的捕捉能力令人叹为观止,仿佛他不是在描述事件,而是在用文字描摹一幅幅精心构图的画面。我尤其欣赏他对时间流逝的处理方式,那种缓慢、近乎停滞的感觉,让读者不得不慢下来,去重新审视那些我们日常中常常忽略的瞬间。比如,书中对于光影变化的描述,简直是教科书级别的——那种穿过百叶窗在木地板上投下的斑驳光束,被文字捕捉得栩栩如生,甚至能让人感到空气中的微尘在光柱中静静悬浮。这种对感官体验的极致放大,使得阅读过程本身就变成了一种冥想。它挑战了我们习惯的线性阅读方式,要求我们停顿、回味,甚至在某些章节,我不得不放下书本,望向窗外,让自己的思绪在文字所构建的场景中缓缓沉淀。
评分这本书的语言风格变化多端,初读时会让人感到一丝挑战,因为它似乎在不断地游走于不同的叙事维度之间,时而晦涩难懂,如同一个深藏秘密的学者在喃喃自语;时而又突然变得极其直白和富有诗意,像夏日午后突然降临的一场清凉的阵雨。这种风格上的跳跃性,初看之下或许会让人有些措手不及,但深入其中后,我开始领悟到这可能是一种有意为之的艺术手法,旨在模拟某种内在的、非线性的思维过程。它迫使读者的大脑不断地进行“解码”和“重组”,而不是被动地接受既定的信息流。有那么几段,我甚至需要借助外部的资料去理解其中引用的典故,但正是这种探索的过程,极大地增强了阅读的参与感和满足感。它不是那种读完就能立刻总结出“中心思想”的书,它更像是一面棱镜,不同的角度折射出不同的光芒,每一次重读,都会有新的理解浮现。
评分我不敢想象老师真的把这一整本书都扫下来作为下个星期的reading,作为一本书它很短,但是作者的writing很dense,观点很明确,风格很乖张。二十世纪艺术和展览被肢解得很彻底,必读的好书。
评分(I did have read it in an afternoon but can remember nothing of it right now hhhhhh
评分我不敢想象老师真的把这一整本书都扫下来作为下个星期的reading,作为一本书它很短,但是作者的writing很dense,观点很明确,风格很乖张。二十世纪艺术和展览被肢解得很彻底,必读的好书。
评分太精彩了,辛辣,富有见地,尤其是那段对两种观看角色Eyes和Spectator的辩证分析。
评分好,写得好
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有