How did it happen that in a time when networks were run by Jewish men, and many television shows were written by Jewish writers, there were so few identifiably Jewish characters on television? In his provocative book, David Zurawik marshalls compelling evidence to suggest that, during television's first thirty-five years, its primarily Jewish power brokers actively suppressed Jewish characters and Jewish themes from appearing on the small screen. Beginning his investigation in the early days of television with Gertrude Berg and The Goldbergs, Zurawik, an award-winning journalist, shows how the Jewish founders of the three major networks--William S. Paley (CBS), David Sarnoff (NBC), and Leonard Goldenson (ABC)--dictated the kinds of shows Americans would watch from the late 1940s until they sold their broadcast empires in the mid-1980s. Under the auspices of these incredibly powerful men, the television industry either distorted or eliminated entirely images of Jews from prime time at the very moment when television came to hold center stage in mainstream American life. In fact, creating a cookie-cutter image of American life was so important to the top Jewish executives that they fabricated a brief, which circulated among the networks and became legendary in the industry. It claimed that CBS had "research" that indicated Americans were not interested in seeing Jews (or divorced people, people from New York, and men with mustaches) on the small screen. Zurawik convincingly argues that Paley and the others were ambivalent about their own Jewishness, and fearful, in the post-Holocaust, pro-assimilation, red-baiting 1950s, that their shows not appear "too Jewish." The ironic result: with few exceptions, shows like Father Knows Best and Leave It to Beaver came to represent American family life, while Jewish identity was presented as something that had to be obscured or hidden away. Only when the moguls sold their interest in the networks and moved on did things begin to change in a sustained way. Serious shows with leading Jewish characters began to appear in series like thirtysomething and Northern Exposure, which dealt with issues of tolerance, intermarriage, and assimilation. But in many of the programs that followed, particularly the sitcoms of the 1990s, Jewish men and especially Jewish women fell into stereotypical roles that Zurawik describes as "nebbishy boyfriends lusting after non-Jewish women" or "Jewish-American princesses and smothering mothers." And, although Jewish characters are now plentiful on television, many are very nominally Jewish, or Jewish in name only. Despite the best efforts of the successors of Paley, Sarnoff, and Goldenson, the culture of Jewish self-consciousness and censorship lives on in network television today. Based on more than one hundred interviews gathered over ten years with network executives, producers, and actors, Zurawik's book gives voice to these insiders--who reveal, for the first time, how and why the depiction of Jews on television has followed such a strange, unpredictable course.
评分
评分
评分
评分
读完这本书,我最大的感受是其叙事结构之精妙,它仿佛不是一本单纯的学术研究,而更像是一部精心剪辑的纪录片,充满了历史的纹理和时代的回响。作者的笔触极其细腻,尤其是在描绘那些“黄金时代”的电视制作人和编剧们,如何在二战后的社会氛围中,将个人经历转化为普世娱乐,同时又巧妙地植入了关于边缘化与身份认同的微妙信息。这种处理方式高明之处在于,它并未采取一种纯粹的批判立场,而是采取了一种近乎人类学的观察视角,去剖析媒体工业作为一个熔炉,如何炼化和重塑文化符号的过程。我特别欣赏书中对不同年代电视节目的详细分析,那些昔日的经典片段在作者的解读下,焕发出了新的生命力,让我这个可能只知道零星片段的读者,也能体会到当年它们对社会舆论和文化风潮的强大牵引力。它让我意识到,我们今天习以为常的许多电视制作规范,都深深地烙印着那个时代特定群体的智慧与妥协。
评分这本书带来的最大的启示,或许在于它迫使我们重新审视“文化同化”的代价。作者似乎在暗示,在“黄金时段”取得的巨大成功,往往伴随着某种程度上的自我稀释。那种在主流娱乐产品中展现出的“被净化”的犹太身份,是否掩盖了更深层次的社会矛盾和真实的群体经验?我尤其喜欢书中对后现代电视的分析,探讨当身份议题开始成为商品时,那些曾经的“局外人”又是如何成为新的“规则制定者”的。这种角色的转换,充满了讽刺意味和深刻的辩证法。它让我明白,媒体的历史,与其说是关于艺术的进步,不如说是关于权力重组的编年史。这本书不仅仅是写给对媒体史感兴趣的人,更是写给每一个关心身份政治、文化权力运作以及大众叙事如何塑造集体潜意识的人。它像一面高倍放大镜,照亮了我们这个时代最复杂、最引人注目的文化景观之一。
评分我必须说,这本书的论证逻辑严密得令人佩服,它成功地将文化符号分析、社会学理论与细致的产业历史相结合,构建了一个无懈可击的分析框架。它没有停留在对刻板印象的表面控诉,而是深入挖掘了这种刻板印象是如何在产业的经济结构和观众的文化期待之间相互促进、自我强化的。作者对电视制作流程的描绘,特别是关于编辑决策和网络高层心态的剖析,极具洞察力,让我仿佛亲身参与了那些深夜的剧本讨论会。这种“内部视角”的呈现,使得整本书的论述充满了说服力。此外,书中对媒介技术演变如何影响身份表达的讨论也十分前沿,它清晰地展示了从广播到彩色电视,再到今天的流媒体,每一次技术飞跃都为特定群体带来了新的机遇和新的束缚。这本书读起来绝对不枯燥,因为它充满了对我们日常生活中习以为常的媒介消费行为的颠覆性解读。
评分这本书的深度远远超出了我对一部文化研究著作的预期。它真正令人震撼的地方在于,它将“犹太人”这一概念放在一个动态的、不断变化的历史背景下去审视,而不是将其视为一个静止的文化实体。作者似乎在不断地向我们提问:当一个群体通过大众媒体获得了巨大的可见度,他们获得的究竟是真正的接纳,还是一种更为精致的、被商业利益驯服的“可见性”?书中的某些段落对于好莱坞黄金时代早期那些充满“身份焦虑”的幕后人物的刻画,简直入木三分,那种既渴望融入主流的强烈愿望,又害怕失去文化根基的复杂心态,被描绘得入骨三分。这让我联想到当代许多少数族裔艺术家在主流平台上面临的困境,可见,这种关于“代表性”的张力,是贯穿整个媒体史的主题。阅读过程,我时常会停下来,思考那些被屏幕有意无意“过滤掉”的细节,以及正是这些细节,构成了我们理解历史真实性的关键碎片。
评分这部作品的书名本身就带着一种引人入胜的张力,它似乎在邀请读者去探索一个在聚光灯下被审视,却又常常被简化和刻板印象所笼罩的群体。我最初翻开它,是怀着一种复杂的好奇心:究竟作者如何处理“黄金时段”(Prime Time)这一极具商业化和大众传播色彩的媒介,与犹太身份之间那个既紧密又充满矛盾的关系?我期待着看到对那些我们熟悉的荧幕形象——从早期的喜剧演员到现代的电视制作巨头——进行一次深刻的去魅过程。它不仅仅是关于“谁在屏幕上”,更是关于“谁在幕后构建了我们所见的现实”。我想知道,这部书是否能揭示出那种隐藏在商业成功和文化影响背后的、关于适应、抵抗与自我认同的微妙拉锯战。那种在主流文化中寻求立足点,同时又小心翼翼维护自身独特性的挣扎,才是真正扣人心弦的故事。我希望它能提供一个充满洞察力的视角,让我们超越那些肤浅的标签,去理解这些创作者如何运用媒体这一强大的工具,来重新书写或挑战自身的叙事。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有