Includes 160 pages of text with drawings, 13 black and white and 51 full color plates. It is linen-cloth and paper bound. <P>In the last decades the art of icons has gained increased attention. Once icons were passed over by the art critics, or at most classified as popular art, although painters such as Matisse or Picasso went to Russia especially for the sake of studying this art. Most recently many books have been published on icon painting. Yet the present work is the first of its kind to give a reliable introduction into the spiritual background of this art. <P>The nature of the icon cannot be grasped by means of pure art criticism, nor by the adoption of a sentimental point of view. Its forms are based on the wisdom contained in the theological and liturgical writings of the Eastern Orthodox Church and are intimately bound up with the experience of contemplative life. <P>The introduction into the meaning and the language of the icons by Ouspensky imparts to us in an admirable way the spiritual conceptions of the Eastern Orthodox Church which are often so foreign to us, but without the knowledge of which we cannot possibly understand the world of the icon. <P>"It is not the purpose of the icon to touch its contemplator. Neither is it its purpose to recall one or the other human experience of natural life; it is meant to lead every human sentiment as well as reason and all other qualities of human nature on the way to illumination." <P>"The entire visible world as depicted in the icon is to foreshadow the coming Unity of the whole creation, of the Kingdom of the Holy Ghost."
<P>The theological justification of the icon was derived by the Seventh Ecumenical Council from the fact of the Incarnation of God. God became human for the elation and deification of Man. This deification becomes visible in the saints. The Byzantine theologian often sets the calling of an icon painter on an equal level with that of a priest. Devoted to the service of a more sublime reality, he exercises his objective duty the same way as the liturgical priest. The "spiritual genuineness" of the icon, the cryptic, almost sacral power to convince, is not alone due to accurate observation of the iconographic canon, but also the ascetic fervor of the painter. <P>A very interesting section of the technique of icon painting is followed by the main part of the book, in which both authors describe the most important types of icons. Apart from a detailed description of the icon screen (iconostas) of the Russian Church, 58 types are explained with the aid of an equal number of illustrations, amongst which there are alone 10 various representatives of the virgin. Special mention is due to 51 icons reproduced in their complete colorful splendor. <P>The section of subjects made in order to reveal the main features of Orthodox iconography was naturally limited to the examples available outside of Russia. But this not in the least diminishes the value of the book; on the contrary, it led to the reproduction of many beautiful icons which had never been published before or had been unknown to wider public. A considerable number of museums and private collectors in Europe and America spontaneously placed their collections at the disposal of the authors.
评分
评分
评分
评分
我必须承认,我是在寻找关于某个特定历史时期艺术流派演变线索时偶然发现这本书的。起初,我对它的期望并不高,以为它会是另一本老生常谈的艺术史综述。然而,这本书展现出的那种跨学科的视野,彻底颠覆了我的预设。作者似乎拥有无尽的精力,将哲学思辨、语言学结构分析与具体的文化现象编织在一起,构建了一个极其坚固且富有弹性的理论框架。例如,书中对“偶然性”在意义形成过程中的作用的探讨,就极其精妙。它挑战了那种认为所有符号都由单一、清晰的意图所决定的传统观点,转而强调了环境、误读、乃至技术限制如何共同塑形了我们最终接收到的信息。我特别欣赏作者在讨论某个理论模型时,会立刻引用一个看似无关的当代流行文化现象作为反例或佐证,这种跳跃性思维,极大地拓展了读者的认知边界。这本书的文字密度非常高,但叙述的节奏却把握得恰到好处,保证了在信息量爆炸的同时,阅读体验依然流畅而引人入胜。它迫使我不断地停下来,合上书本,试图在自己的日常经验中寻找那些隐藏在表象之下的运作机制。
评分这本书的学术野心是毋庸置疑的,但真正让我感到震撼的,是它在批判性思维上的彻底性。作者对于既有理论的“祛魅”过程,毫不留情,却又充满了学者的尊重。他们不是简单地推翻旧有观点,而是细致入微地解剖其产生的历史土壤和内在的逻辑缺陷。特别是关于“权威性”是如何被符号系统所编码和维护的那一章,简直是一次对权力运作的精妙展示。作者通过对一系列被时间筛选下来的“经典案例”的重新审视,揭示了这些案例本身也包含了选择的痕迹和被遗忘的故事。我从中得到的最大收获是,任何看似稳定和永恒的“意义”,都值得我们用怀疑的目光去审视其形成的根源。这本书不是提供答案的,它是提供一套更精良的提问工具。读完它,我感觉自己看世界的方式发生了一种结构性的变化,看待日常生活中那些不言自明的现象时,会不自觉地去追溯其背后的“建构过程”,这种能力上的提升,是任何单一知识点都无法比拟的收获。
评分这本书的封面设计简直是一场视觉的盛宴,那种厚重的历史感和精妙的细节处理,让我忍不住一次又一次地翻开它,即使只是为了欣赏那些排版和装帧的匠心。我尤其欣赏作者在引言部分对于“意义”这个宏大命题所采取的谦逊而又充满探索欲的姿态。他们并没有急于给出最终的定义,而是像一位经验丰富的老者,娓娓道来知识的脉络是如何从模糊的直觉,逐渐被提炼、被固化,最终成为我们今天所理解的符号体系。书中对于一些基础概念的梳理,比如“表征”与“指涉”之间的微妙张力,分析得极为透彻,不是那种生硬的学术堆砌,而是充满了启发性的案例。我记得有段论述,对比了不同文化背景下对“圆形”这一基本几何形态的心理投射差异,那段文字读起来让人仿佛置身于人类文明的漫长历史长河中,感受到符号是如何随着时间的推移而不断被赋予新的生命和内涵。装帧的纸张质感也极佳,翻阅时发出的那种轻微的摩擦声,本身就是一种仪式感,让人对接下来的阅读内容抱有更高的期待。这不仅仅是一本书,它更像是一件精心制作的工艺品,体现了对知识的尊重和对读者的体贴。
评分我通常对这类主题的书籍持有一种审慎的态度,因为很多作者往往会陷入对术语的过度迷恋,使得文本变得故作高深、晦涩难懂。然而,这本书给我的感觉截然不同。它展现了一种罕见的清晰度和坦诚,作者似乎非常清楚读者在哪些地方可能会感到困惑,因此,他们总能及时地提供一个形象的比喻,或者一个极具画面感的场景来帮助我们锚定抽象的理论。举个例子,书中用来解释“迭代意义”的部分,作者引用了一个关于古老航海图不断被修正和增补的故事,这个故事立刻将“意义的动态性”这一冰冷的学术概念,转化成了对人类探索精神的赞美。阅读这本书的过程,与其说是学习知识,不如说是一次智力上的探戈,作者带领着你,时而优雅地前行,时而巧妙地后退,让你在不知不觉中完成了对复杂知识的内化。它成功地平衡了深度和可读性,让非专业人士也能从中获得巨大的满足感,而专家学者也能从中找到新的思考角度。
评分对于一个沉迷于逻辑和严谨的读者来说,这本书最吸引我的地方在于其结构上的完美对称性。章节的划分并非基于时间或地域的简单线性排列,而是遵循着某种内在的逻辑递进,从最基础的“感知单元”开始,逐步推导至复杂的“社会建构体系”。这种层层递进的论证方式,使得即便是非常晦涩的概念,在作者的引导下,也变得清晰可解,仿佛冰雪在阳光下消融,最终汇集成一股清澈的溪流。书中对“共识机制”的剖析尤其让我拍案叫绝。作者没有满足于描述“大家同意了就是这样”的表象,而是深入挖掘了是什么样的心理和社会机制在起作用,是什么力量在不断地约束和修正这个共识,使其不至于彻底瓦解。我感觉自己像是在参与一场高水平的学术辩论,作者既是强有力的辩护者,又是公正的裁判。此外,随书附带的图表和索引制作得极其专业,那些复杂的概念关系图,与其说是辅助材料,不如说是作者思想的结晶,直观地展示了看似分散的知识点之间是如何相互勾连的。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有