'Fans and disciples of Seymour Sarason all know that education reform needs a change in course. Indeed, the daily practices of schools, education research, and US educational policy all need such a change. Neither Professors Glazek and Sarason, nor anyone else, can give yet a complete description of what these changes would involve. But when the change happens, the leaders of the change will all acknowledge their considerable debt to this book. The reason is that the needed change in school classrooms will be very hard to recognize as such unless these leaders are thoroughly familiar with the concept of 'a context of productive learning.' In this book, Glazek and Sarason collaborated on an extraordinarily daunting attempt to create and analyze a context of productive learning in which, simultaneously, Sarason was the student and Glazek the teacher and vice versa. They attempted what must surely be a 'Mt Everest' example of the concept: explanation of Einstein's famous formula, E=mc².áThe result should be of intense interest to a broad audience concerned with the present problems of science education as well as the nature of a context of productive learning.' -Kenneth G. Wilson, H. C. Youngberg Trustees Distinguished Professor Nobel Laureate for Physics, 1982 Department of Physics, The Ohio State University 'By making accessible and intelligible Einstein's theory of relativity, this remarkable book reveals to its readers the power and possibility of their own learning and, in doing so, brilliantly demonstrates the power and necessity of productive learning for everyone.' -Andy Hargreaves, Thomas More Brennan Chair in Education Lynch School of Education, Boston College 'Professors Glazek and Sarason have written a creative and instructive book that will be read for years to come. Drawing upon their backgrounds in physics and psychology, they support EinsteinÆs recommendations as to the importance of the humanities. The authors' purpose is to help readers acquire a substantive grasp of how Einstein accomplished what he did and the implications of this for educational reform. The reader's view of teaching and learning will be forever changed by the authors' insights.' -Dale L. Brubaker, Professor University of North Carolina 'This is an interesting and provocative book, written by a psychologist with several thousands of hours of observation and analysis of classroom teaching in public schools and a physicist. The book starts with a critique of teaching in our schools and explains why educational reform has been so minimal in its effects. The movie 'Mr. Holland's Opus' is used as a distinguisher between good and bad teaching methodology. These chapters are followed by physics chapters on the foundation of Einstein's E=mc¦. The authors follow Einstein's thinking and use the features of light as a vehicle for their discussion. They fold in stories and shy away from formulas, which they leave for appendices. The book ends with a chapter on the philosophy of teaching. The book is well written and eminently readable; the arguments are easy to follow. I recommend the book to anyone interested in the basis of modern physics and Einstein's role in it.' -Ernest M. Henley, Professor Emeritus of Physics University of Washington Use the concept of productive learning to reframe school reform!áWhy do people, college-bound or even in college, stay away in droves from courses in science, especially physics? Why do people know so little about the significance of Einstein's contributions which require dramatic changes in how we understand ourselves, our world, and the entire universe? Why have educational reforms failed? In this book, two professors, one a particle physicist and the other a psychologist, confront these questions in a unique way based on the assumption that people can grasp on a non-superficial level what Einstein did in 1905 if, and only if, the features of productive learning are taken seriously. The authors make clear that those features are applicable in teaching any subject matter by devoting two chapters to music and other arts. In the case of science, they chose Einstein's work precisely because of the general belief that it cannot be assimilated by 'ordinary mortals' whose brains are not 'wired' to comprehend the ways in which time, mass, energy, and the speed of light are seamlessly interrelated. But this book is not an attempt to popularize Einstein. Its goal is to demonstrate that features of the context of productive learning are applicable to any teacher-student relationship, regardless of whether the student is in first grade, in high school, or in college. Einstein's work was about alignment of frames of reference of observers in physics. A similar process of alignment between the minds of a student and a teacher is the vehicle of productive learning. The book explains the analogy. The authors discuss and emphasize that educational reform will continue to fail as long as the concept of learning is fuzzy and provides no direction to the teacher-student relationship. Reform efforts will continue to fail unless and until they are based on a clear distinction between contexts of productive and unproductive learning.
Seymour B. Sarason is Professor Emeritus of Psychology, Yale University. During his distinguished 48-year career, he has been one of the most astute observers and incisive critics of efforts to reform our schools. Among his more than 30 published books are The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform (1990), Schooling in America: Scapegoat or Salvation (1983), and The Culture of School and the Problem of Change (2nd ed., 1982).
评分
评分
评分
评分
对于《Productive Learning》这本书,我只能说,它完全颠覆了我对“学习”二字的认知。我一直认为学习就是坐在书桌前,死啃书本,直到把内容背下来为止。这种方法不仅枯燥乏味,而且效率低下。直到我读了这本书,我才发现,原来学习可以如此有趣,而且效果可以如此显著。书中强调的“深度学习”和“批判性思维”的概念,让我受益匪浅。它鼓励我们不要仅仅满足于表面的理解,而是要深入挖掘知识的本质,并学会质疑和反思。我特别欣赏书中关于“如何构建知识体系”的论述,它提供了一些非常实用的框架和工具,帮助我将零散的知识点串联起来,形成一个有机的整体。现在,我学习新东西的时候,不再是死记硬背,而是会主动去思考它们之间的联系,并尝试将它们应用到实际生活中。这种学习方式让我感觉自己真的掌握了知识,而不是被知识所累。
评分这本书我大概读了有一半了,说实话,刚拿到这本书的时候,我带着一种半信半疑的态度。市面上关于学习方法、效率提升的书籍实在太多了,有些甚至可以说大同小异,来来回回就是那么几套理论。然而,《Productive Learning》给我的感觉却很不一样。它不像有些书那样,上来就给你一套严丝合缝的“万能公式”,而是更注重引导读者去发掘自身的问题,并提供了一系列可以灵活应用的工具和视角。我尤其喜欢它关于“主动回忆”的章节,之前我总觉得死记硬背就是学习,但这本书让我意识到,真正有效的记忆需要主动地去提取和巩固,而不是被动地接收。它提供的练习方法,比如我最近在尝试的“间隔重复”,虽然刚开始有点挑战,但确实感觉效果比以前好很多。而且,这本书的语言风格也很接地气,不会让人觉得晦涩难懂,很多例子都非常贴近我们的日常生活和学习场景,读起来很有共鸣感。它没有给我一种“灌输”的感觉,而是像一位经验丰富的导师,耐心地和你探讨,让你自己去发现学习的乐趣和奥秘。
评分《Productive Learning》这本书,我必须说,它绝对是我近几年读到的最有价值的书籍之一。它不是那种一眼就能看透的书,需要你花时间去思考,去实践。我特别赞赏书中对“学习者心态”的探讨。我一直以来都有一种“固定型思维”,总觉得自己不擅长某个领域,就不愿去尝试。这本书让我意识到,通过努力和方法,任何人都可以变得更聪明、更高效。它鼓励我们要拥抱挑战,从错误中学习,并相信自己的成长潜力。书中关于“如何保持学习的长期动力”的章节,对我来说尤其重要。我之前经常出现“学习三分钟热度”的情况,但通过书中提供的策略,我学会了如何设定小目标,及时奖励自己,并找到学习的内在乐趣,从而让学习成为一种习惯,而不是一种负担。这本书就像一个宝藏,每次阅读都会有新的收获,它不仅提升了我的学习能力,更重要的是,它改变了我对待学习的态度,让我看到了一个更广阔的学习世界。
评分我是在一个朋友的推荐下接触到《Productive Learning》的。当时我正处于一个职业瓶颈期,感觉自己的知识更新速度跟不上行业发展的步伐,学习新技能总是事倍功半。这本书虽然名字听起来很功利,但实际内容却出乎意料地深刻。它不仅仅是教你如何“学得快”,更重要的是引导你思考“为什么要学”以及“如何学得更有效”。书中关于“目标设定”和“动机管理”的部分,我反复看了好几遍。我之前总是习惯于想到什么学什么,缺乏清晰的目标,导致学习过程很零散,也容易半途而废。这本书让我明白,设定清晰、可衡量、可达成、相关性强且有时间限制(SMART)的目标是多么重要。它提供了一些很实用的方法来帮助我们识别内在动机,并将其转化为持续学习的动力。读完这本书,我对自己未来的学习规划有了更清晰的认识,也更有信心去迎接新的挑战了。它让我意识到,学习不仅仅是知识的堆砌,更是一种思维方式的重塑。
评分我是一名学生,平时课业压力很大,总是觉得时间不够用,学习效率也很低。偶然的机会,我读了《Productive Learning》这本书,它真的给我带来了很大的启发。我之前总是在“埋头苦干”,但效果却不尽如人意。这本书让我认识到,提高学习效率的关键不在于“多学”,而在于“巧学”。它提供了一些非常实用的学习技巧,比如“番茄工作法”、“思维导图”、“费曼学习法”等等,这些方法都非常容易上手,而且效果显著。我尝试着用这些方法来学习,发现自己的学习效率真的提高了很多。而且,这本书也帮助我认识到了“休息”和“复习”的重要性,以前我总觉得学习时间越长越好,但这本书让我明白,适当地休息和科学的复习,反而能让学习效果事半功倍。现在,我不再像以前那样焦虑,而是更加从容地应对学习中的各种挑战。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有