Too often interviewing is seen as simply a tool for data collection, while in reality it is a complex, subtle process that cannot be separated from the dynamic of the project or from the multiple and changing contexts of everyday life. In posing the question, "what is research for?", "Interviewing and Representation in Qualitative Research" explores the processes of interviewing as itself a project intimately involved in contemporary debates around knowledge, freedom, power, ethics, modernism postmodernism, and globalisation.What makes the book distinctive is its focus on interviewing not just as a tool to be used within other frameworks such as case study, action research, evaluation and surveys, but as an approach to organise a project as a whole, to provide frameworks for organising perspectives on the multiple 'worlds' of everyday life. It is argued that every project, every methodology, every theoretical perspective has its own rhetorical framework that interacts with the 'world' as subject of study or focus for intervention. The interview, as defined in this book, is both the process of constituting and de-constructing world views - it is the inter-view, the place between worlds.Without the 'inter-view' no dialogue and no alternatives as a basis for difference, change, and development would be possible. The inter-view as conceived in the book is fundamental to qualitative research as an emancipatory project. Research practice is thus placed in the context of philosophical, theoretical and methodological debates, taking the reader beyond many introductory texts, making it suitable for all students and researchers who wish to advance the frontiers of their research and engage with contemporary social and political realities.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
太多無聊的後現代多元思辨。麵對這種情況，難道不需要強調真正的“解放性策略”，絕非作者陳詞濫調誤讀後得齣的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是堅持一個真正的拉康觀點：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多無聊的後現代多元思辨。麵對這種情況，難道不需要強調真正的“解放性策略”，絕非作者陳詞濫調誤讀後得齣的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是堅持一個真正的拉康觀點：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多無聊的後現代多元思辨。麵對這種情況，難道不需要強調真正的“解放性策略”，絕非作者陳詞濫調誤讀後得齣的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是堅持一個真正的拉康觀點：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多無聊的後現代多元思辨。麵對這種情況，難道不需要強調真正的“解放性策略”，絕非作者陳詞濫調誤讀後得齣的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是堅持一個真正的拉康觀點：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多無聊的後現代多元思辨。麵對這種情況，難道不需要強調真正的“解放性策略”，絕非作者陳詞濫調誤讀後得齣的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是堅持一個真正的拉康觀點：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有