圖書標籤: 政治經濟學 比較政治 政治學 民主化 比較政治經濟學 民主 比較政治學 David_Samuels
发表于2024-11-22
Inequality and Democratization pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
Research on the economic origins of democracy and dictatorship has shifted away from the impact of growth and turned toward the question of how different patterns of growth - equal or unequal - shape regime change. This book offers a new theory of the historical relationship between economic modernization and the emergence of democracy on a global scale, focusing on the effects of land and income inequality. Contrary to most mainstream arguments, Ben W. Ansell and David J. Samuels suggest that democracy is more likely to emerge when rising, yet politically disenfranchised, groups demand more influence because they have more to lose, rather than when threats of redistribution to elite interests are low.
Ben W. Ansell is Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions at Nuffield College, Oxford, and co-editor of Comparative Political Studies. His work on education, democracy, and housing markets has appeared in the American Political Science Review, Comparative Political Studies, World Politics, and International Organization. His book From the Ballot to the Blackboard (Cambridge University Press, 2010) was awarded the 2011 William Riker Prize by the Political Economy Section of the American Political Science Association.
David J. Samuels is Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Political Science at the University of Minnesota. He is the coauthor of Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers (Cambridge University Press, 2010); the author of Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil (Cambridge University Press, 2003); and the co-editor of Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America (2004). His work has appeared in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, Comparative Politics, Comparative Political Studies, Legislative Studies Quarterly, and the British Journal of Political Science. He currently serves as co-editor of Comparative Political Studies.
理論野心很大,但不如預期。模型很簡單,實證也比較粗糙。但是不失為一本有很大意義的著作,因為民主化理論不能隻是A&R的基於中位選民提齣的劫富濟貧。獨裁統治expropriation的一麵和upper middle class與統治階級的矛盾在Ansell & Samuels之前已經很久沒人提瞭。
評分理論野心很大,但不如預期。模型很簡單,實證也比較粗糙。但是不失為一本有很大意義的著作,因為民主化理論不能隻是A&R的基於中位選民提齣的劫富濟貧。獨裁統治expropriation的一麵和upper middle class與統治階級的矛盾在Ansell & Samuels之前已經很久沒人提瞭。
評分成為大佬的途徑之一是挑戰大佬
評分理論野心很大,但不如預期。模型很簡單,實證也比較粗糙。但是不失為一本有很大意義的著作,因為民主化理論不能隻是A&R的基於中位選民提齣的劫富濟貧。獨裁統治expropriation的一麵和upper middle class與統治階級的矛盾在Ansell & Samuels之前已經很久沒人提瞭。
評分理論野心很大,但不如預期。模型很簡單,實證也比較粗糙。但是不失為一本有很大意義的著作,因為民主化理論不能隻是A&R的基於中位選民提齣的劫富濟貧。獨裁統治expropriation的一麵和upper middle class與統治階級的矛盾在Ansell & Samuels之前已經很久沒人提瞭。
The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
評分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
評分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
評分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
評分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
Inequality and Democratization pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024