图书标签:
发表于2024-11-24
After Rorty pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Richard Rorty is regarded as something of a pariah in mainstream philosophical circles. Trained by some of the most eminent philosophers of the twentieth century, he has come to be one of the strongest critics of the philosophical tradition. Over the years Rorty's books have cast serious doubt on philosophical ambitions, such as whether we can provide deep and uncontroversial definitions of justice, truth, and knowledge. He has also questioned whether it makes sense to ask if the beliefs we have, in some deep sense, correspond with the "real world." Instead of trying to resolve deep philosophical questions, Rorty believes we should turn our attention to social issues, broadly conceived as "increasing solidarity". In this book, G. Elijah Dann takes seriously Rorty's writings, showing how, contrary to what many philosophers believe, he actually helps to enhance and enliven both the philosophy of religion and the chances for moral progress. Dann goes on to discuss Rorty's metaethics and reviews. Rorty's well-known article, "Religion as Conversation-stopper," showing how the private/public distinction, though well-placed, needs adjustment. Contrary to Rorty's view that religious values should remain in the private realm, Dann maintains religious values can play an important role in the public square, albeit through a "translation" into secular terms. Finally the book explores how the history of philosophical interests shaped theological ones and Dann looks at Rorty's more recent thoughts about religion, particularly in his discussion with the Italian philosopher Gianni Vattimo.
罗蒂之后--伦理学和宗教的可能性.......罗蒂的影响力还是差了点,有传播方面的因素,也有自己论证不足的因素,还有就是人们不愿承认的因素...罗蒂和蒯因在我眼里都是极富勇气和才华的哲学家,但是某些方面确实走的太过了。面对哲学基础主义的全面失败,罗蒂把之归结为整个文化的失败,范式的坍塌(有些人则干脆回到被误读的维特根斯坦),难免受到那些善辩的同行们的反驳。伦理学家现在的困境就是,是否能重建一种无根基的多元的伦理学。
评分罗蒂之后--伦理学和宗教的可能性.......罗蒂的影响力还是差了点,有传播方面的因素,也有自己论证不足的因素,还有就是人们不愿承认的因素...罗蒂和蒯因在我眼里都是极富勇气和才华的哲学家,但是某些方面确实走的太过了。面对哲学基础主义的全面失败,罗蒂把之归结为整个文化的失败,范式的坍塌(有些人则干脆回到被误读的维特根斯坦),难免受到那些善辩的同行们的反驳。伦理学家现在的困境就是,是否能重建一种无根基的多元的伦理学。
评分罗蒂之后--伦理学和宗教的可能性.......罗蒂的影响力还是差了点,有传播方面的因素,也有自己论证不足的因素,还有就是人们不愿承认的因素...罗蒂和蒯因在我眼里都是极富勇气和才华的哲学家,但是某些方面确实走的太过了。面对哲学基础主义的全面失败,罗蒂把之归结为整个文化的失败,范式的坍塌(有些人则干脆回到被误读的维特根斯坦),难免受到那些善辩的同行们的反驳。伦理学家现在的困境就是,是否能重建一种无根基的多元的伦理学。
评分罗蒂之后--伦理学和宗教的可能性.......罗蒂的影响力还是差了点,有传播方面的因素,也有自己论证不足的因素,还有就是人们不愿承认的因素...罗蒂和蒯因在我眼里都是极富勇气和才华的哲学家,但是某些方面确实走的太过了。面对哲学基础主义的全面失败,罗蒂把之归结为整个文化的失败,范式的坍塌(有些人则干脆回到被误读的维特根斯坦),难免受到那些善辩的同行们的反驳。伦理学家现在的困境就是,是否能重建一种无根基的多元的伦理学。
评分罗蒂之后--伦理学和宗教的可能性.......罗蒂的影响力还是差了点,有传播方面的因素,也有自己论证不足的因素,还有就是人们不愿承认的因素...罗蒂和蒯因在我眼里都是极富勇气和才华的哲学家,但是某些方面确实走的太过了。面对哲学基础主义的全面失败,罗蒂把之归结为整个文化的失败,范式的坍塌(有些人则干脆回到被误读的维特根斯坦),难免受到那些善辩的同行们的反驳。伦理学家现在的困境就是,是否能重建一种无根基的多元的伦理学。
评分
评分
评分
评分
After Rorty pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024