Titus Andronicus is still regarded by many as a bad play of dubious authorship. Its adversaries have abhorred the violence of the action and the apparent lapses in the quality of the verse. Since 1945, however, the play has been taken increasingly seriously in both the theatre and the study: the violence and cruelty it depicts were disconcertingly matched by the events of two World Wars. Hughes joins those critics who take the play seriously, arguing for its unity of theme and its grim humour, and demonstrates that it is the work of a brilliant stage craftsman, confident in his mastery of space, movement and verse. The text is based on the first quarto, supplemented by crucial additions and stage directions from the Folio. For this updated edition, a new section is included on recent stage, film and critical interpretations by Sue Hall-Smith. An updated reading list completes the edition.
評分
評分
評分
評分
我大概具有傳說中典型的戰後心態,Titus Andronicus和Troilus and Cressida我都覺得很有看頭。。。以及Introduction真好看
评分我大概具有傳說中典型的戰後心態,Titus Andronicus和Troilus and Cressida我都覺得很有看頭。。。以及Introduction真好看
评分我大概具有傳說中典型的戰後心態,Titus Andronicus和Troilus and Cressida我都覺得很有看頭。。。以及Introduction真好看
评分我大概具有傳說中典型的戰後心態,Titus Andronicus和Troilus and Cressida我都覺得很有看頭。。。以及Introduction真好看
评分我大概具有傳說中典型的戰後心態,Titus Andronicus和Troilus and Cressida我都覺得很有看頭。。。以及Introduction真好看
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有