Book Description
Although readers of prose fiction sometimes find descriptive passages superfluous or boring, description itself is often the most important aspect of a poem. This book examines how a variety of contemporary poets use description in their work. Description has been the great burden of poetry. How do poets see the world? How do they look at it? What do they look for? Is description an end in itself, or a means of expressing desire? Ezra Pound demanded that a poem should represent the external world as objectively and directly as possible, and William Butler Yeats, in his introduction to The Oxford Book of Modern Verse (1936), said that he and his generation were rebelling against, inter alia, "irrelevant descriptions of nature" in the work of their predecessors. The poets in this book, however, who are distinct in many ways from one another, all observe the external world of nature or the reflected world of art, and make relevant poems out of their observations. This study deals with the crisp, elegant work of Charles Tomlinson, the swirling baroque poetry of Amy Clampitt, the metaphysical meditations of Charles Wright from a position in his backyard, the weather reports and landscapes of John Ashbery, and the "new way of looking" that Jorie Graham proposes to explore in her increasingly fragmented poems. All of these poets, plus others (Gary Snyder, Theodore Weiss, Irving Feldman, Richard Howard) who are dealt with more briefly, attend to what Wallace Stevens, in a memorable phrase, calls "the way things look each day." The ordinariness of daily reality is the beginning of the poets' own idiosyncratic, indeed unique, visions and styles.
Review
"Spiegelman's masterly study of the persistence of the descriptive impulse in contemporary poetrydemonstrates how resourcefully poets of various stripes engage themselves and the reader in inventive acts of looking at the visible world. Spiegelman has served his poets, and the art of poetry, well." --Frank J. Kearful, Partial Answers
"How Poets See the World yields fresh insights on every page, touching upon the history of taste, or the sources of styles. As a guide to the work of poets whose difficulty Spiegelman never glosses over, it is indispensable." --Rachel Hadas, Rutgers University
"Masterly.... Spiegelman demonstrates again and again how a superlatively educated, cultivated, sympathetic, earnest, even passionate reader...goes about the joyful business of reading every scripture in the spirit in which it was written.... That How Poets See the World can balance these two imperative, to see by means of and to see the true nature of, is its large and substantial achievement." --Twentieth-Century Literature
"Many critics have explored the relationship between landscape and language, but Spiegelman goes farthest in analyzing the disposition of parts of speech and syntactic arrangements, the sentences that create the effect of description. This attention to language leads Spiegelman to some superb close reading. He understands that poetry is first and foremost an art form, with language as its medium, figuration its inevitable activity.... Reading him, we are observers of an honest, intense encounter with some major contemporary writers. Every poet must wish for such attentiveness, such willingness to learn from the poems themselves how they want to be read." --Bonnie Costello, Literary Imagination
"An important contribution to the literature on what W. J. T Mitchell calls 'picture theory,' that is, the nexus of word and image. Via shrewd analysis on an eclectic range of poetsSpiegelman sometimes seduces but more often startles his reader into an awareness of the vital role description plays in contemporary American poetry.... Spiegelman, whose prose is as eloquent as it is insightful, demonstrates with ample grace that description does indeed make a profound difference when it comes to interpreting a poem.... Essential." --Choice
"This most distinguished and illuminating book on the importance of poetic description is as timely as it is exemplary for what criticism should be. The author brings to bear his profound knowledge of the depths of descriptiveness, as first explored by English romantic poetry, on an acutely chosen group of contemporary poets. A compelling interchapter considers the importance of emphasis in the poetry of our time. This beautifully written study is as free of academic jargon as it is knowledgeable of theoretical issues, and fully sensitive to cultural as well as personal formations of poetic perspectives. But its ultimate concern is with the intellectual power and, particularly, the moral mandates of the fundamental aesthetic domain in which poetry is what it is." --John Hollander
"Willard Spiegelman is one of the few literary critics who understands not only how poets see but also how they think, feel, breathe--how they inhabit the world by inhabiting language. He writes with the elegance of the poets he admires most, and How Poets See the World is his best book yet." --James Longenbach, University of Rochester
"Willard Spiegelman's new book is a marvel of speculative energy. Poetry's descriptive task--finding the words that address both the world's textures and the poet's own sensibility, or what this critic calls the 'inconstant constancy' of things--is examined with a provocative eye for the subtle and profound differences among individual poets. For one, syntax is a style; for another, landscape replaces sexuality. Spiegelman provides fresh and compelling readings for a wide range of contemporary poets, and brings to this book a rare moral acumen, genuine sympathies, and a steady grasp of the emotional underpinnings and overtones of a poet's ambitions or of a poem's structure and effect. How Poets See the World is an eye-opening adventure, and sure to become a classic text." --J. D. McClatchy
"Contemporary criticism is abuzz with 'thing theory,' but only Willard Spiegelman has shown us how contemporary poets develop a language of things, at once particular and metaphoric, always faithful to sensation as a source of imagination's renewal. In this brilliant study Spiegelman explains one of the dominant rhetorical modes of our skeptical time and shows how daily attention to the visible world becomes a source of poetic power." --Bonnie Costello, Boston University
Willard Spiegelman is Hughes Professor of English at Southern Methodist University and Editor-in-Chief of The Southwest Review.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书最引人注目的一点是它对“感知”这一主题的极度细致入微的解构。它似乎拥有一种魔力,能将那些我们以为自己已经完全理解的感官经验,重新拆解成最基础的粒子,让我们重新认识我们是如何“看到”和“理解”外部世界的。我特别喜欢作者在描述那些细微的感官输入时所展现出的近乎科学家的严谨和艺术家的敏感。这种跨学科的融合处理得天衣无缝,没有丝毫生硬的痕迹。它让我开始重新审视自己与周遭环境的关系,思考那些潜藏在视觉、听觉背后的文化和社会编码。读完后,我发现自己走路时会不自觉地放慢脚步,试图捕捉光影在墙壁上移动的轨迹,这无疑是这本书带来的最具体、也最持久的影响。
评分这本书的语言风格简直像极了某种古老的炼金术,将日常的、平凡的词汇,通过精妙的组合与排列,提炼出了某种近乎哲学的“黄金”。它不是那种华丽堆砌辞藻的文本,而是恰到好处的精确,每一个形容词和动词的选择都仿佛经过了千锤百炼。我注意到作者频繁使用对比和悖论的手法来深化主题,使得原本可能显得枯燥的议题立刻鲜活起来,充满了张力。例如,书中对“可见性”与“不可见性”之间微妙关系的探讨,读来令人拍案叫绝。这种文学上的技巧运用,使得这本书的阅读体验远超出了普通非虚构作品的范畴,更接近于一种文学鉴赏。它迫使我放慢语速,去品味每一个词语在句子中所产生的共振效果,而不是囫囵吞枣地追求信息量。
评分这本书的叙事节奏把握得极其精妙,它不是那种平铺直叙、教科书式的讲解,而更像是一系列精心编排的对白和独白交织而成的情景剧。我尤其欣赏作者在构建论点时所采用的跳跃性思维,那种看似不连贯的片段,在下一刻却奇迹般地汇集成一条清晰的河流,最终流向一个令人意想不到却又无比合理的终点。这需要读者投入极大的专注力,仿佛在进行一场智力上的探戈,每一步的进退都关乎对整体结构的理解。我用了好几次时间回头重读那些似乎是岔路口的地方,每一次回溯,都能发现新的层次和含义。这本书挑战了传统学术写作的刻板印象,它证明了严肃的思考完全可以以一种充满音乐性和韵律感的方式呈现出来。读完后,我感觉自己的思维被重新校准了一遍,对信息处理的方式都有了微妙的改变。
评分我必须承认,这本书的某些章节对我来说构成了不小的挑战,它需要的不仅是知识的储备,更是一种开放的心态去接纳那些颠覆性的观点。作者似乎对既有的美学标准保持着一种审慎的疏离,不轻易依附于任何一个成熟的流派,而是致力于开辟新的疆域。这种“在场”与“缺席”的辩证关系在全书中贯穿始终,像一根无形的线索牵引着读者不断深入。对于那些期待快速获得明确答案的读者来说,这本书可能会带来一些挫败感,因为它提供的不是答案,而是更深刻、更复杂的问题。但正是在这种持续的追问和模糊性中,我找到了久违的智力上的兴奋感。它不是一本用来“读完”的书,更像是一本需要时常被“激活”的作品,每次重温,都会有新的对话产生。
评分天哪,我刚读完一本书,简直被那种深邃的洞察力给震撼到了。这本书不像我以前读过的任何一本关于文学理论的书籍,它更像是一场思想的漫游,带领你穿梭于那些我们习以为常却又常常忽略的日常细节之中。作者的笔触细腻得像是在用丝线编织一幅复杂的图景,每一个字都承载着沉甸甸的重量,却又轻盈得仿佛随时会消散在空气里。读到某些段落时,我忍不住停下来,望着窗外发呆,试图去捕捉那些转瞬即逝的灵感火花。这本书的真正价值,或许并不在于它教你“如何”去阅读,而在于它让你重新学习“如何”去感受这个世界。它迫使你放下那些固有的视角和框架,去拥抱一种更原始、更具张力的存在方式。那种体验是如此私人化,以至于我很难用简单的“好”或“不好”来概括。它更像是一面镜子,映照出我们内心深处那些未被言说的渴望与困惑。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有